1. Welcome to the #1 Gambling Community with the best minds across the entire gambling spectrum. REGISTER NOW!
  2. Have a gambling question?

    Post it here and our gambling experts will answer it!
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Discussions in this section are assumed to be EV- as they are outside of the Advantage Play section. For EV+ discussions, please visit the Advantage Play section.
    Dismiss Notice

Roulette Reason for winning?

Discussion in 'Roulette Forum' started by Blacksmith, Sep 20, 2020.

  1. Blacksmith

    Blacksmith Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2020
    Likes:
    15
    Location:
    QTN
    When playing roulette ,baccarat ,lotto or what ever you like and winning consistently there must be a reason why it happens.

    If there are no reason is it only that luck is on your side?

    Could this reason for winning be applicable to any out come of a " random game" and a so called HG be UNIVERSAL?

    Kind regards

    B
     
  2. Garfield

    Garfield Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2020
    Likes:
    86
    Location:
    Indonesia
    Amat victoria curam....winning for those who prepare...
     
    Blacksmith likes this.
  3. Garfield

    Garfield Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2020
    Likes:
    86
    Location:
    Indonesia
    You'll never know when you're going to win...but you better be prepared when the time comes...

    Like having enough capital, dare to execute without hesitation, being rational and aside emotion away...things like that...
     
    Cocobongo2020 and Blacksmith like this.
  4. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    There might not be a reason or a meaning for winning from randomness but there is a reason for seeing winning while it occurs. A trend on it's own is nothing more than chaos arranged into a figure formation that is identifiable. A person that sees ships in cloud formations knows it when they see it. They see ships often at times. It does not mean that it is going to rain, yet sometimes it rains. I have proven that even the harshest critics can see the figure formation of singles on the weak side. What nobody can know is will this formation coincide with a win.
    If you see this formation and bet on it to continue, then if it does continue, you win. So you can see formations already in a condition of continuing.

    So if you can also catch a streak of bet attempts that were chosen just from figure formations that were still in conditions of continuing, your bet selection process, then it all falls to your money management on maneuvering through your effectiveness as it evolves while in a session of placing these bets. If it works then these figure formations are a sign that you can see win streaks. If however you lose and or grind your way down through the session then the figure formations for bet selections do not work. If you want this process to be your HG then you must be agile and deliberate about the conditions you are facing and tackle any adversity with money management.

    So my conclusion is you can see times when win streaks are contenders for win streaks because they are figure formations in synchronization with money management.

    This is my way of giving a HG a reason for winning. I have never seen a set of rules from a system that just barges ahead through wins streaks and losing streaks and ever successfully came out ahead. Even that must go through up or down changes over time.
     
    mr j and Blacksmith like this.
  5. Blacksmith

    Blacksmith Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2020
    Likes:
    15
    Location:
    QTN
    There are predicted abilities in random numbers and mathematically proven.

    Especially when random numbers are limited and general predicted random numbers are replaced with stronger /confined bet selection.

    Kind regards

    B
     
  6. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    Can you give an example?
     
  7. Blacksmith

    Blacksmith Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2020
    Likes:
    15
    Location:
    QTN
    Hi gizmotron.

    Van der Waerden's theorem could be a good bet selection with MM but the deadlocks are a problem .

    Repeaters are a stronger/confined bet selection than the of law of large numbers.

    Then the Pigeon hole principle with repeaters in a selected amount of numbers.

    This is my way thought regarding a method.

    Kind Regards

    B
     

  8. Garfield

    Garfield Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2020
    Likes:
    86
    Location:
    Indonesia
    Blacksmith, cmiiw interpreting pigeon hole.... there's at least one hole with more than one pigeon, but there could be more than one hole contain no pigeon?
     
  9. Blacksmith

    Blacksmith Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2020
    Likes:
    15
    Location:
    QTN
    Hi Garfield.

    There are many possibilities but prefer the top one.

    Saved this from a forum think it was posted by falkor2k15


    "Pigeonhole Principle (PP)
    If n+1 objects are placed in n boxes, then one of the boxes must contain more than 1 object.

    (PPb)
    If n-1 objects are placed in n boxes, then one of the boxes must be empty.

    Extended Pigeonhole Principle (EPP)
    If nk+1 objects are placed in n boxes, then one of the boxes must contain at least k+1 objects.

    (EPPb)
    If nk-1 objects are placed in n boxes, then one of the boxes must contain at most k-1 objects.

    Generalized Pigeonhole Principle (GPP)
    If nk+s or more objects are placed in n boxes, then for each 0 ≤ m ≤ n there exist m boxes with a total of at least mk + min(s,m) objects

    (GPPb)
    If nk+s or fewer objects are placed in n boxes, then for each 0 ≤ m ≤ n there exist m boxes with a total of at most mk + max(0,s+m-n) objects"

    Kind regards

    B
     
  10. Ordinary_people

    Ordinary_people Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2020
    Likes:
    89
    Location:
    Asia
    Jangan yang curam. Saya takut. Lol
     
  11. Garfield

    Garfield Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2020
    Likes:
    86
    Location:
    Indonesia
    Loh.....haha...ga nyangka....kalau mau wa aja nol lapan smbilan lima dua pat dua tujuh puluh lapan smbilan nam
     
    Last edited: Sep 22, 2020
  12. Ordinary_people

    Ordinary_people Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2020
    Likes:
    89
    Location:
    Asia
    Sing bilu ya, garfield ?
     
  13. Rustyshackleford

    Rustyshackleford Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2019
    Likes:
    37
    Location:
    nyc
    thats probably the best question asked in gambling. and the answers are spot on, be prepared, i think of it as a chess game, you and your opponent assume equal strengh however your opponent is playing white goes first and white controls the game much like the casino everything is fair everything is equal so why should one side win over the other? i guess it all comes back why were here, testing testing and testing blackjack players tested their counting skills and it prevails, poker players tested their skills it succeeds, i tested various systems playing roulette and i know what can be achieved and what can't be, betting 1:1 could never yield good results but betting on a straight up number and hitting it does provide good results 35-1 >1:1 in the world of gambling from my experience and luck is a funny bird when comes to gambling obvious id rather have the luck playing the lotto than any other game.

    i guess thats the reason for winining, in practice as well in theory, try in theory at home and then try it in practice at casino we can mimic all the games if not most of all casino games at home with modern computers, we all want to win forever we all want that edge, and we want to beat the casinos not 1/10 of the time or 2/10 but atleast 6/10 of the time to double a bankroll of 10 times over , over the course of time is the best route.
     
  14. Nathan Detroit

    Nathan Detroit Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Likes:
    2,080
    British Wise guy and and gambling addict (31 ) who lost 1.4 million EUROS over 2 notes at the roulette tables in Zurich is suing the casino gor 1 million money back.

    He alleges they did not prevent him to purchase more gambling chips.


    Casino says no hardship case since he still has still about 200 k EU left from 1,6 million gambling winnings on his account .




    Tough sgitzky buddy. Fortuna is fickle and soon asks back what it was given .
     

  15. Nathan Detroit

    Nathan Detroit Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Likes:
    2,080
    The cat LOST fair and square . Accept losses and winnings with the same grace .


    His system did not survive the long run. no matter how good ..



    Always expect the unexpected .




    ND
     
    Cocobongo2020 likes this.
  16. Nathan Detroit

    Nathan Detroit Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Likes:
    2,080
    Casinos are for recreation and entertainment. Anyone who thinks different is a fool.


    I never got hit in any casino because I know when to get up. Some of my net winnings are well invested in Mutual funds giving me returns of capital gains and dividends.



    The knowledge of a very simple formula can make anyone to come out ahead..


    So simple to apply the formula.
     
  17. Sharptracker

    Sharptracker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2018
    Likes:
    290
    Location:
    Belgium
    You never proved anything mate except being under confirmation fallacie and trying to find example suiting your nonsense theory.
     
  18. Nathan Detroit

    Nathan Detroit Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Likes:
    2,080
    Reading Randomness ? Much ado about nothing .
     
  19. Nathan Detroit

    Nathan Detroit Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Likes:
    2,080
    To make something perfectly clear that my selected system is not the HG but good enough to consider an attempt to win 2 out of 3 sessions .

    This 2 out of 3 sessions I am applying to all my casino games .
     

Share This Page