Roulette Reading Randomness

The ultimate combo is the combo threesome. Example: the odd, low, & red numbers. Some groups are 5 in all and some are 4 in all.

Once you get tempted by them they are like temptress' of the sea. They are a very short lived thing. You would be lucky to get one at a time.

So lets say that you are playing 100 units a bet on EC's. Then you see a possible 3/combo with 5 in the cluster. So you bet 20 instead of 5 per number. That's four times the value of a common flat bet at 90 on 18 numbers. So for 20 units you win 700 if it hits. Sometimes these long shot bets hit.

If you balance them out then they are not much better than any EC bet. But if you have a monster sized global effect in many of the sets then 2 combo sized or 3 combo sized combo bets can be wonderful. 9 numbers bet on reaps 27 on a win and 9 on a loss.

 

Those 5 Red/odd n umbers gave the impression of a castrated Red Snake.

 

Glancing at the scoreboard once in a while can give you an idea what to expect in the average length of a possible streak that might be encountered .

Loke I said already before a streak begins when an EC makes its first showing.

The rest is up to the player how to proceed.

 

Sharp cats would play 3 different EC in competition with each other. Each with its individual MM.



Play at your own risk.

 

Those wise guys in the early and subsequent days of Monte Carlo knew what was the best for them Red or Black.

 

Please note that long streaks of B or R are very rare . Be happy with those of 2 or 3.

 

Gizmo.

Omit the color and go for 9 number Low and Even combo.





Play at your own risk.


ND

 

There are all kinds of combo bets that work. I like combining a sleeper in the double dozen dozens with a sleeper in the double columns. It's just 16 numbers. It works as long as both sleepers or streaks of singles continues. It's own thing that I love about double dozens and 24 numbers. A sleeping dozen or a streak of singles is very common. In the rare events you get 10 to 15 sleepers in a row at least three times per day. It's just a matter of seeing it. So when it happens in two different groups of dozens at the same time you can really parlay an easy 3 or 4 in a row. It's just noticing coincidence. If you were part of seeing an "Elegant Pattern," like a perfect sleeping dozen for more than 30 spins in a row you could kill it at the casino. So even watching for the monster sized sleeping dozen is worth it. It's reading randomness and attacking the occasional grand opportunities. It's not the only strategy. It's just being a good boy scout.

If you have a streak of odds with a streak of blacks and bet those 9 combination numbers then why would you bet on the Even / Low numbers? I could never understand the logic. It's like being a hot number chaser and only betting the coldest few numbers just to outfox randomness.

 

The field is WDE open for Roulette bet selections. They are out there for the taking. No gimmicks and no waiting 6 hours or 180 spins for a cold number to show or not to show.

 

Winning with "accounting 101 " is a proven fact but winning with Math that`s random luck .



ND

 

Merry Christmas Nathan and to everyone.

 

Mark,


I liked your post at an outside forum " anyone has a winning system on this etc."


Might be a good repeat here.




ND

 

OK:

"You might not want to overlook this. There are ways to do well at gambling. If you come up with a bet selection process math oriented players will say that it does not matter. You must lose more bets placed than you will win, in the aggregate. That is completely true. However you can still win almost all of your gambling sessions as long as you don't try to correct the imbalance with a progression. A blind bet selection progression will succumb to the same imbalance result of the odds. So you will lose as expected.

There is however a way. It comes from using a simple two stage MM method. You can use any consistent or non-consistent bet selection method that you want. This will take into account all suspicions that there is a magical math beating strategy. In fact there is no magical bet selection that will make this work or not work.

What works is noticing the slow grinding up or down of the gambling session. You can also use rapid changes too. If you have trouble relating to this then just look at the Red / Black results from 100 continuous spins. If you bet only Red numbers and the same amount for all 100 spins you might win or you will more likely lose a little. If you study this technique long enough you will learn from how at times things tend to favor you or at other times they will oppose you. In most cases they will oppose you because of the house's edge advantage. This is in accordance with the math that tends to dominate everything. You are expected to lose more bets than you win.

So how do you deal with this? I suggest that you find a way to see if you can see swarms of the same positive or negative conditions. For a while Red will dominate. Conversely you will see stretches when Black will dominate. It just stands to reason that you want to use these conditions to your advantage. So you bet small when you can't see an obvious condition of dominance. You bet bigger when you can by betting the dominate side while it continues.

That is the winning system that you should be looking for. You don't have to pay anyone to figure this out. You just have to master the skill of observing the conditions. You can't blame others for not gaining these skills. You can't blame math where you are expected to lose more bets than you will win. You can lose the bets that you are supposed to lose. You just attempt to do that at the cheap price. Some will try to tell you that you can't know what a dominate streak looks like because you can't predict how long it will last. But they are just using the streak to make the same point. So it comes down to knowing what dominance looks like and learning how to exploit them when they tend to last for a while. You never get to predict how long they will last. You don't need that power of prediction. You just need to bet bigger when you are winning. This logic confounds the math oriented players that use it as an excuse to never look for it or to gain the skill of using it. So they persist on gambling forums and act like saviors of the world protecting people from this very simple approach to gambling. It's like a religion to them. They have their dogma, belief system, and followers. They can't help themselves.

That's the good part too. They protect the opportunity to use MM to aggregate wins. It's fun to watch them take the higher ground. You watch. This single topic makes them flip out. Just try to convince them that you can see a win streak. They can't even manage to accept the possibility that a person con notice a win streak. So they attack the messenger. It's all they have. The implication is that they have always defended a losing position and they are wrong. That can't be true. So you get dogmatic control freak machinations and a full breakdown of the free discussion process.

So pick a side. You can learn to be skillful or you can carry water for the religion of math & gambling."

 

Its actually very visible & noticeable even if you don't train to sed the trend dominating, though it might ovffer you an additonal advantage.

E.g.
Just place bets on all 3 EC, whatever & static - repeat it over & over for a hundred or more spins.

You will see how variance coupled with your bs produces a clear & intense rise in balance - might even give you faster heart hitrate being on the roll. Suddenly you will experience change & see that balance deplete. Kind of like weather seasons.
Try an experiment, do this for about 100-300 spins on R - won't take long.
You will see how this season come & go - & you'll get the hang of it.

I think the important point is when (you already had a good run, & the bad run) - suddenly it starts to pick up again.
As Gizmo says, this is the point you are to amp up the bets. Getting the hang of it the balance will indicate/tell you when its time to stop too, switching to lower bet value option.


You might also try an alternative bs - use all 3 EC, & simply place bet on the series e.g. marque shows 2 high, 3 even, 1 black prequelled by red - so bet High, Even, Black - & so on & so forth every spins.
In essence there will be seasons where these streaks are prolonged by variance & times where it will be simply spitting two or all 3 opposite consistently enough to kill all the profit. Doesn't really give the advantage over the other, static bs.

The point is, each bs is as such just a probe, that indicates seasons - visible in the balance line.
So higher value & lower value bets accordingly.

Know how much can a season give you before turning - how practice & get the hang of it. That's all.



If your RR gives you further edge perhaps.

 

People on the outside don't get Reading Randomness. Here is why it works. It's not just seeing trends. It's seeing trends that tend to be continuing.

If a person is going to bet the trends then the trends need to be lasting long enough to win something. But what they really do is show you the win streaks. If you don't see a continuing trend then you are not seeing a win streak. If you do see a continuing trend then you are seeing a win streak. Trends show you the win streaks as long as it is working. So you look for working trends. With RR you get to look for many all at once, not just two sides of one coin. With many to look for you stand a far better chance of finding quality opportunities. I recommend one trend at a time and staying away from combo bets as long as the conditions for both parts are short lived. Don't push with wishful thinking. Just wait and the good parts will come to you.

 

What's the sign of sufficient resistance?

 

Certain outside roulette forum is known to be a system mill. No matter how good a system or productiv it may be is gnawed to death within 72 hours.

Personal insults are being thrown against the author to make their displeasure known.


to any different than the BS.cc. with a clown at the helm.

 

People on the outside don't come here, have never heard of it, couldn't care less, because you guys are stuck talking to the same three or four unremarkable people on this forum.

 

Those two clowns on the "bet selection forum" are first class weirdos! One of them (XXVV) is also trying to solicit investors into investment schemes without a license!

 

Point one finger ahead, while three back, and, one up.

Anyway, what the heck is with the titles, "founding member", and "lineage to founders"?

Goofy, no?