Baccarat Oscar's grind + baccarat

There it is, pure mathZombie tactics. Thank you for that.

This all seeing Oracle is here to tell you that past occurrences can't predict future outcomes. Does that mean that that is what you were looking for? Glad to disappoint you. That and your comprehension skills as well.

 

Jae is an outed liar and everyone should be aware of that.

 

You are so lame. OG on -20 and he's here to help. Take your pill. You know. the one that adds IQ. You need it.

 

Go back to LY's thread where you bombed it.

 

OK so here it is.

It felt silly coding this because I know it can't work. I removed the -20 rule because, well, it is illogical, irrelevant and useless. So let's pretend the simulation begins at -20. What's the difference?

Sure, if you have a 200 units TP and 2000 units to play with, it will work very, very often, and it does work. You can have a lot of fun with dicebot OG if you are into coding. You can turn the bot on in the morning and very likely have your nice 200 units every day. For a few days, weeks, maybe even months. You may even double the bankroll or more.

Until it doesn't work. Gambler's ruin happens no matter what. You will lose more than you've won. HE and sequence of death, everyone knows this. If you do the same thing everyday you will always lose eventually.

Crypto dice is fun because you can have a bankroll of a quadrillion satoshi for very little money depending on the coin.

Doesn't matter if it is 2000 units or a quadrillion units.

Remove the TP and let it run and gambler's ruin happens faster. It will go bust in a few hours or days, I mean, i'ts just the OG, anyone with minimum understanding of these things knows this.

It may take a million bets, but it will go bust.

Code:

chance  = 50
unit    = 0.00000005
nextbet = 0
debt    = 0
w       = 0
l       = 0
og      = 0

function dobet()

    if win then
        w = w+1
    elseif not win then
        l = l+1
    end

    if (l-w>20) then
    og      = 1
    nextbet = unit
end

if (og==1) and not win then
    debt = debt+previousbet
end

if (og==1) and (debt>0) and win then
   nextbet = previousbet+unit
   debt    = debt-previousbet

end

if (debt<0) then
    debt = 0

end


if (og==1) and (debt<previousbet) and win then
    nextbet = debt+unit
end

if (og==1) and (profit>unit*200) then
    stop()

end
end

 

I had thought you were a more informed gambler. This exposes you to suggesting that a mechanical system based on a known to not work progression might be worth trying.

 

Are you kidding. Use $20,000 to get $200? By all means. Go for it. Take it to a real casino and show them how smart you are.

 

Mental health issues are not laughing matter.

 

Why should Jae have all the fun?

 

I've been living with this for over 50 years. That's not to say that I'm not sympathetic with those that struggle with it. But I really feel sorry for the chronically stupid. They can't take a pill or learn to live with it.

 

I said and I repeat, that I had people
tested with real money but too low assigned bankroll and it failed.

And I am asking people to test it further because the narrative of interest to me, is that it can be replicable to scale. And presumably do not have to depend on Van Gogh types, mental types or trailer park vagabonds and their idiosyncrasies who would come up with all kinds of vomit inducing excuses for their failures.

 

This the simpler code:

Code:

chance  = 50
unit    = 0.00000005
nextbet = unit
debt    = 0

function dobet()
  
if not win then
    debt = debt+previousbet
end

if (debt>0) and win then
   nextbet = previousbet+unit
   debt    = debt-previousbet

end

if (debt<0) then
    debt = 0
  
end


if (debt<previousbet) and win then
    nextbet = debt+unit
end
end

Just the basic OG.

I dare anyone to make consistent proffit with this.

 

As I see it the way it is promoted and with endorsement from Brazil, no less, is that I think RR requires a level of intellect beyond many people of goodwill on this forum. So some dare not even try even though it is being promoted aggressively on an OG thread and the best small business threat.

Like you said, there is no pills for low IQ as there are for mental problems. Humans are like these when they perceive a requirement that is beyond them, they dont want to try and make themselves look stupid. In a way, it makes the promoter look smart.

 

This is the funniest of all. RR is a success story filled with various characters that know that it can't work. Too bad for them that one day they will be shown the truth. That's what makes engaging them now, before that time, as even more interesting. I know what will happen. Human nature will not keep a lid on this. You see delusions of grandeur and I see uninformed critics that might be too stupid to use it. That has not been researched yet. Other's will have that opinion regardless of the lame brains. RR is also a test to see if you can learn a skill. You flunked out and are now a ticked off ...

 

I see it this way: there has to be a way.

If it was simple, it would have been discovered already.

If it's simple, a computer could do it.

If a computer can do it, go ahead and code it, let it run online and enjoy. No need to stay 8hs on a casino with no beer (that sounds awful).

The real people with delusion of grandeur are the ones that think that they have found a way to profit consistently by betting the same all the time with a rule-based progression. I mean, seriously? Hundreds of years of gambling, and you are the first one. The chosen one.

 

That's the definition of pride, isn't it? I can't do it, therefore it must be false.

 

Hei Pedro. Do RR with real money and let us know your starry, starry nights ya.

 

I already did, in a way. I tested it with faucet money and compounding in a crypto dice site. I went from 0,1 to 30 in less than 2 weeks; and it wasn't even RR per se, it was something similar I came up with using financial market strategies.

Brazil is a magical place. You have no idea the cultural treasures we have in here. We don't get the reputation we deserve. That's why we are heavily suppressed. There is a whole school of financial market analysis that was invented by a Brazilian guy. It has similarities to RR in that it looks for patterns in the candles. Kinda like candlestick patterns but with probabilities.

 

You are actually mostly correct. I’m not going to dispute most of what you said. And since I’ve already explained some things that you don’t understand, I’m not going to bother again with you. I understand that you want to disregard my trigger of -20. That’s fine, It doesn’t really have too much of an effect and there’s no need to justify why I do it to you. You’re findings are correct, you can win for several months. With those guidelines you entered, making 200 units a day doubles your bankroll in 10 days. There is a money management building process by utilizing long wins of weeks or months at a time that prevent you from ruin in the case of busting. I’ve never denied this. I have always said and will continue to say that YOU will bust a 2,000 bankroll, but that you can win more than you lose if properly managed.

Changing one small detail in your programming might not seem like much, but you’ll notice that it is in fact a lot when you are talking weeks and months.

if you are going off of my guided method, your script should be 51 in CHANCE. Banker wins 51% of the time, not 50.

 

You have not lived until you make yourself look stupid. I'm not recommending it. I'm just an extreme sports expert that has placed has life on the line many hundreds of times. Perhaps I'm the dumbest of all. I'm not afraid to suck. Some people can only see a cry for help. I told my story because I'm not afraid to own it. I took all the ammunition away from a dick. I got the people here to investigate his lies. Even you with your Joan of Arc bit doesn't bother me. It all reflects on you. (Joan of Arc) reference disparaging metaphor. Hope you get that?