TurboGenius Advantage of Repeaters explained - part 3 - 2020

Do you bring with you the hitters from cycle 1 to cycle 2? Looks to hit but the many numbers makes it also to go back big.

 

I think I understand it better now after re-reading it a couple of times. So in a nutshell you keep the hitters, remove them for play only if they hit two times in a cycle. And add one more unit on them in every new cycle.

 

cycle 1:
a number repeats, we start betting on it with 1 chip.
We reset spincount on all numbers before repeat but keep spincount within cycle.
Say # 14 is our first repeat and it came on spin 9.
We now bet 1 unit on # 14 and we treat it as if this number was our first spin since we began, but in reality we are at spin 10.

example:

16
27
8
13
24
9
14
31
14 -----) repeat on spin 9
----------------------------------------14
(14)
28
17
3
3 -----) repeat on spin 13
----------------------------------------14/13
(14/13)
27
12
1
19
23
9
23 -----) repeat on spin 20
----------------------------------------14/13/23
(14/13/23)

etc etc

 

We repeat this progress until we have a hit on one of our numbers (3 hit) and we are at a new high. In this case we start all over.
Or we are at the end of our cycle at spin 35 and we have a handfull of repeats but not at a new high. We now take over our repeats to cycle 2 (36-70) and we start the spincount over on our numbers but now our repeats and any new ones that come along now need 4 hits to be able to be removed when one is hit but we are not at a new high.
Same goes for the 3rd cycle. We play all our previous repeats and add new ones but now our repeats need 5 hits in total to be able to be removed from our repeaters list when hit but not at a new high.
At this point 97% of all our sessions will be over and we are at a new high. If not, wich will be very rare, keep goin" in the 4th cycle, now 6 hit is needed to be removed.
Hope this explains it.
You can adjust it any way you like, even without the reset of the spincount. you can also do it after each cycle, it doesn't matter the outcome stays the same. this is a great bm style to play at a live table without to many numbers in play. test it and have fun. Have a nice day.
cheers,
eddy

 

Thanks for the clarification Eddy! Maybe I don't fully understand but almost. Do you increase the stake with one chip on every repeater when you come to a new cycle? You mentioned something like that.
So the repeaters are divided I mean...an example:
3
15
20
3 <---- repeater
14
15 <---- not a repeater?
34
6
2
14 <----- repeater
and on.. I guess you understand
Cheers

 

Played few sessions online your BM way Eddy, took me 7 sessions to make +126u (base stake 1u per number), drawdowns were smaller than doing the "original" way you described betting all repeats. Will see how long I can go without a losing session or a big dip down.

 

Style 1:
play all repeats and remove the once in cycle 1 once they got hit (3hit) and your not at a new high. Continue this progress until end of cycle (spin 35)
Not at a new high, continue into cycle 2 with all the repeats left from cycle 1

Great!
Now try the following.....
There is no such thing as a cycle, just a bag with 37 numbers.....
Everytime we put our hand in that blue bag, we grap one number from it and put it in front of us on the table.....
#23 is the first tile we pulled from the bag.....
We continue to grap numbers and chain them until we get a repeat.....
#23 #4 #0 #11 #13 #32 #17 #24 #1 #29 #36 #0 ..... 12 numbers were pulled from the bag.....
We found out that #0 is a repeating number.....
We write #0 down on a piece of paper and we are putting all the numbers we grabbed back into our blue sack.....
We now have 36 numbers in the bag instead of 37!.....No?
In reality there are still 37 tiles, but instead of playing against 37 numbers we are now playing against one less.....
Something to think about.....
No cycle, no spincount! It doesn't exsist..... Only thing that matters is that numbers repeat, always!
What if i told you that you can alway reach a new high with a max of 8 numbers in play? Not possible ? Stay tuned.....
Thanks Ed.

 

hello mr eddy.

I have been testing his approach of playing the first form you mention and have had some dangerous sessions where my bankroll goes down over 500 chips and going through cycle 3 and 4, but I have to say that only happened to me playing online.
For the second way it says I haven't tried it, but I'll keep you posted.
What I can assure you is that the face-to-face and online casino roulette wheels do not yield equal results, it seems that the online ones are much more balanced all the time and the face-to-face ones are more unbalanced for the way you play.
If you'll be so kind, continue to see that incredible form that claims to win with 8 numbers.

Hector

 

ok last part.
We are always betting between 1-8 numbers, never more.
And we are only betting repeaters.
how do we make sure we always end our session in profit?
STATS & MATH
please so research with live spins only.
I only use my own live spins or o use and copy from wiesbaden in rx.
Now run 100 sessions of 185 for example...
look at those 100 (18500) spins and tell me that you see what i see.....
What will always happen?
Record the min and the max of all the 3 hits, 4 hits and 5 hits. then report the results here.
When i see people made the effort of collecting those data and reported back here the results, i will explain how they will always win by using those stats and thw math that goes with to always end a session in profit.
Only a few will know what i mean, the rest will have to so some research.
have a great night.

 

Jekhb, should we collect data like this?

 

yes, correct. But you have the data the wrong way around. The min are in the max, you should switch that.But other then that yeah that's the way.

 

Also make sure you are using live spins only no rng.

only 3 5 hits in 185 spins is very very low.

 

Is this better?

3,700 spins collected from online live roulette spins. Will do more later today!

 

thanks, but something isn't right.
you can't have a min. of only 3 3peats in 185 spins!
most of all the repeats that were formed before spin 185 will turn to 3 hits around this time. I never saw less then 14 3s in 185 spins.
please check again.

 

Oh no sorry! The data shows at the end of 185 spins 3 numbers out of 37 had at minimum 3 hits.. but no more than that. And 34 numbers had 3 hits or more. Does that make sense? Maybe I'm doing it wrong?

 

when you go right down the sessions it's better to do it this way.
Example,
Session: 3 Hits 4 hits 5 hits
001 21 24 17
002 19 19 21
003 33 28 26
004 35 21 13
005 27 25 12
006 etc etc etc

then when you have collected data from 100 sessions, you can then tell what the min and max is for the 3-5 hitters.
remember to also count the following....
when you have a 5 hit that this is counted also as a 3 hit and a 4 hit.

007
008
009
010
etc

 

Let me know how I should arrange the data if you can and I will get on it!

 

I got ya now! Thanks I will redo the data today. Sorry about that!

 

do you use rx?

 

I've used the trial. Everyone says it's worth it so maybe I will buy it