Baccarat Ten people needed to post x200 baccarat outcomes

No need for anyone to post any good reviews (which are most likely fake), it’s the bad reviews that matter. Like I said before, if I look up reviews on a restaurant and someone says there was a piece of dog shit on their burger… no amount of good reviews are going to convince me to try a shit sandwich. Stop selling shit sandwiches.

 

Well, I just realized that I had a -3 unit stop loss per shoe in place for the testing that I described. If I remove the stop loss the correct figures for Stephen's two patterns would be as follows...

Zumma 1600 +0.07% edge
4062 Shoes -0.05% edge

Both are certainly better than the normal -1.06% house edge.

 

You're a shitshow Stevie everything you post is scam max! if you find one fact it'll apply to countless situations and you'll milk it like an utter on a cow, give up everybody knows your scam. What is douchebag!!!!!!!!!

 

I'll post some live shoes for you, Stephen.. Here you go... View attachment 14773 View attachment 14773 View attachment 14774 View attachment 14773 View attachment 14774 View attachment 14775 View attachment 14773 View attachment 14774 View attachment 14775 View attachment 14773 View attachment 14774 View attachment 14775

 

The above are various live shoes through the year I've played..

 

I can tell that your mother didn't show you any love when you were a baby. This is why you've turned out to be a jealous individual who is full of hate and malicious nastiness. Unfortunately no shrink the the world can fix that.

 

I can tell you're not so popular in your village. Did the village idiot educate you? Please don't tell me he fathered you...ffs You're whole life is a scam. tut tut tut. No wonder why Gates wants them all to take the vipershot. We get you don't like me, then why are you still here...nothing better to do, afraid my new system is a winner!

 

*in the world...

pity you were abandoned, you could've amounted to something. Don't start a family since I can't imagine how horribly you might speak to your kids. You'd run them down, tell them how useless they were and how they will never amount to anything and that you wish they had not been born etc etc. And what of your girlfriend or wife, can't begin to imagine what she must think of you. No don't answer that -- but something tells me you will -- guess she took off long ago...and who can blame her ffs, I mean we can't tolerate you on here. Do you really think you amuse readers?

We get it you hate me....but why are you still here? You didn't post any outcomes, you're a total loser and a fraud who wants to be liked on a gambling forum. Next time I go down the pub or to a casino remind me to tell the lads about you, so that we can have a good old laugh.

Post those 200x outcomes otherwise stay away, people know you're full of it. Given you a good opportunity to prove my new system doesn't work, but because you know my systems are the best in the world you refuse to post outcomes because you full well know I am the greatest casino betting system creator in the world. This is why you attack me so much. Prove me wrong and POST THOSE 200x OUTCOMES, otherwise get lost.

 

the links do not open, can you please just post 200x outcomes like as follows:

P B B P P P B P B P P P B B ....

OR

B
P
P
P
P
B
B
B
P
B
P
and so on

 

Stephen, what concerns me the most is how we are going to use your system(s), without getting caught in the casino as you described earlier?

I guess best to use common sense: not raising bets from say $25 to $250, conservative betting, and not being greedy!
Yes - I am still interested to find out more, thanks...

 

A further question then: if the gameplay is structured in a particular manner, so that when you wait for certain triggers and/or increase or decrease bets to produce multiple wins, multiple times... Over time casino staffs will eventually find out right??

Please don't get me wrong, I don't work for any casino.
I am not trying to rubbish your systems. I simply feel that I need to know before they catch you. Cause we all know about their sophisticated computer systems in place!

 

I don't know, I know people become greedy and start at a high bet size and/or raise wagers by too much and too soon and only visit one casino. I guess one needs to visit more than one casino. For sure not going to work online. Big wagers, wins too often and the computer online account will flag user is winning all the time and player will be banned of restricted. Online casinos can do what they want, it's in their terms and conditions.

 

It seems to me that it would be pointless to pretend to lose during certain betting rounds, in order to convince the casino that you are only there for "fun".

 

even in a land-based casino, the CCTV all bets, can look back, write down wagers, when and by how much and work out the system. The problem is winning too much too soon. Best to play land-based casinos mostly and not same one too often and not too much and only play when casino is busy to blend in. I guess best not to use membership card if possible and have other place bets for you. It depends, if a player is a whale or known whale then s/he will get away with short term wins, even big ones, but not too often, is s/he wins too often big the casino will not entertain their bets. Casino will take a hit but only up to a point, if it's a winning system, and they know for sure and will be able to tell/work that out, they will put a stop to it. Casinos are a business and they will protect their profits/assets. I guess players must blend in without reasonable bet sizes and as I wrote not visit same casino all the time. And possibly use other to place bets on their behalf. But for sure, not going to work for long online casinos in same account name. Got to admit that.

 

No, I would never lose just to try and show I'm losing, I'm there to win and if I can't win because they stop me or my bet size is too high then I have to ask others to place bets for me or visit many casinos. Not going to work online. Player might get away with a once per week visit to same casino, to hit them for 5k maybe, maybe more if they are a whale or known way maybe 20k maybe 100k depends on the casino. but problem is casinos communicate and if same whale moves around one casinos company will inform others. It's going to boil down to using others to place those wagers.

 

You’re not too far off I suppose. I’m an orphan. My parents died tragically soon after I was born, so I never did grow up knowing them. Fortunately, I was raised by the most loving two people ever put on this rock: my grandparents. I grew up on a small farm in the middle of nowhere with a population of 13 people in our county. Financially, we were poor, but rich with love. My grandpa was a preacher, and owned a very small sawmill selling ties to the railroad. The lack of socialization probably caused my lone wolf mentality, but my upbringing gave me a stronger set of morals than you’ll ever be capable of obtaining or comprehending. Sadly, my dear beloved grandparents passed away in my teens. I didn’t have many options at the time, so I joined the military. As tragedy seemed to be a cornerstone in my life, it wasn’t all that surprising when I took 3 bullets in combat and nearly lost my leg. After my medical discharge, I soon became homeless. This may have been the only time in my life when I was at the bottom that I could possibly have ever been jealous of anyone else, but I would use the word envy over jealousy.

When my best friend from high school heard about what I had gone through, he provided transport to come stay with him during my year long recovery. Besides a place to stay and emotional support, he gave me an acoustic guitar, and a Rubik’s cube—two things I’d never actually touched before. These would be two items that would turn my life around. The guitar actually helped me earn an honest living and contribute towards our household. The Rubik’s cube helped me learn my true potential.

Since the Rubik’s cube has more of an application towards baccarat, I won’t delve into anything musical. You just posted a competition on this forum, and it reminded me that I used to do the same thing on YouTube. Here’s an old video of me doing one of the challenges.



This is the final clip of a user live posted challenge. Where my best friend beside me mixes up the cube until the viewers are satisfied and I get 30 seconds to observe the cube before solving it either blind folded or behind me.

The purpose of this example isn’t to create a debate on whether it’s real or not, I assure you that it is 100% real and it has become one of my most popular party favors over the years and a way to ridiculously hedge my tips when I was a bartender. Along one of the bars I worked at many years ago were dozens of cubes that patrons would bring in and toss at me to solve in less than 20 seconds.

And now to the point of it all and why I’m sharing it with you. First off, I don’t hate you. I think people like you are terrible and just awful and the worst in this industry, but I also believe people can be better, even you, hopefully you.

The Rubik’s cube will serve as an analogy for baccarat methods.

If I were to toss you a cube right now and ask you to solve it, most likely, you would do what many people do: attempt to solve one side first.

The more time and effort you have while practicing this, you ultimately get better and better at solving one side, sometimes even a second and possibly a third side.

The beginning baccarat player can solve the first side on their own. The players with more experience can often times help the new player in additional tips and steps that make the game easier.

The most ideal thing for a Rubik’s cube solver or baccarat player is to find a mechanical system that will ensure victory. There are mechanical systems that can solve a Rubik’s cube. At one point in time I learned how and tried it out for myself. It took me over 15 minutes to solve the cube, and since I was on a track to try and obtain recognition as the fastest solver in the world, this system has zero benefits to me.

So how do I do it?

My brain is no better or worse than the next guy, but I just tend to see things a bit differently than most. The reason people that struggle solving a Rubik’s cube is because they are too focused on one side at a time, often not taking into account that it is a six-sided object. The analogy crosses over well because in most things in life, we look at things two-dimensionally while forgetting we live in a three-dimensional world.

This idea falls into theory of course, in many games, such as poker for example, we have already established and many people practice and learn poker theory. We haven’t established baccarat theory; hence, that’s why I’m writing a book.

Back to the Rubik’s cube: since every turn affects another side, constantly trying to solve one side only gets you thinking that you’re going somewhere, but you’re not actually even close to solving it by the same methods and misconceptions that people have about it.

Let’s say solving one side of the cube is the equivalent of reaching a trigger in baccarat. Now with each turn in your trigger, it has an affect on the backend. This is the part we aren’t always focused on, but it’s more important that the trigger itself because without it, that first move might end up being right in the short term, but in order for it to work with the long term (the other side and the object of solving the the game) we need to understand how it works together. This is the money management aspect.

There are a few more keys to unlocking this puzzle. Keys that are fundamental to both the cube and the game of baccarat. You didn’t ask for the solution, because you believe you already have it… and I still can confidently say that you don’t. You haven’t shown us anything that reflects on any competent ability to solve this game.

What you did ask for is a few decisions, and I’ll oblige if that’s what you think you want or need to figure out this game. I’m here to help.

Oh, quick final thought since there’s so much more to my story, but it’s just noteworthy to add that my best friend in the story… well, we are still best friends. After I became a self made millionaire off of baccarat, I moved him across the country to Connecticut and helped him become a millionaire as well. Thought you’d find it interesting to know that one year ago this month, my good pal was laid off from a steel mill during covid and had less than $2,000 to his name. He’s currently worth 1.4 mil.

 

So what’s the most you’ve ever won? What’s your net worth from gambling? Is that taboo? I’m over the 4 million mark myself. Truth be told, I never before my baccarat journey that I would ever need to learn how to lose, but I find it an important part of being a professional. I would assume that if you’ve ever consistently won big money, that you would quickly see how badly you need the casino to think you’re not winning as much as you are.

I agree with you that you shouldn’t use a player’s card, but it’s important to have one and to utilize it for recorded losses.

Granted, I try and be an honest person and go about things legally in most regards, so perhaps this is the shadiest thing I do.

I LOSE on paper. And on paper only. Even without a players card, certain payouts are recorded with the casino. Keeping tabs on those wins and trying to bring down those wins to neutralize them is an art.

And since there aren’t any authors or gurus out there trying to teach people how, here’s a perfect opportunity to add this segment to your book. You can even beat me to it since I won’t be publishing until next year.

Here’s the basic gist of how I do it:

As an example, let’s say I’m forced to cash out at $6,000. The casino has this as a recorded win minus the buyin amount.

I create a ledger for the recorded profit, we’ll say it’s $4,000.

I want to try my best to eliminate this.

I use a semi-martingale strategy for this purpose. I’m not trying to lose, but losses happen. So if one of my triggers calls for me to bet, let’s say $1,000. I want to win this bet, naturally, but if the bet loses which it very well might, I want it to be recorded as a loss and bring that $4,000 in profit down to $3,000.

I’ll use my gaming card when I make this $1,000 bet. If it loses, then I’m in red $3,000 as far as visible profits. If it wins, I’m in the red for $5,000.

I’ll then remove my card from recorded play and wait for a trigger that calls for a $2,000 bet or something substantially higher. It’s really a game of itself and very complicated to maintain a low winning record, but obviously worth it to take off any potential heat or to avoid a large amount of taxes.

You should think about it, I mean, if you ever come across a system that actually makes money or can afford to bet more than 25 or 50 a hand. Haha.

 

Thing ONE: I am NOT trolling. I am attempting to add humor and amuse, nothing more.

Thing TWO: When I saw this post all I could think of was that while I did not have 200 shoes easily available (BOX-in Storage) I could easily list 200 arguments I got in with baccarat players.

P.S. I really do have a LARGE box of shoes from when I ran the Baccarat Team. I'm not going to go look for it, but if I run across it randomly I will pass it on to someone. It was left to me after someone passed away.

 

*shoe
apologies, auto correct

 

I was merely chiming in to complement you on your short story level post. Your prose and writing style are oddly similar to mine.

I'm sorry to say I did not read the posts to which this was a reply, yet. I may later for more context. I gather, (having only read this ONE post) your occasionally acerbic tone was a response rather than initiation.

Anyway...nice story and nice writing!!!

~FK

p.S. My solution to solving the Rubik Cube was to paint the sides.