Roulette I've seen a new absurd claim that the gambler's fallacy isn't.....

Prove that. Post on here your random 10 tries.

 

Well let me say that Rsim isn't the most reliable source of proof. To many strange things happend to me there, that made me believe it isn't random at work here.
And second, i don't need to proof anything to nobody, i'm fine just where i am. If people think i'm full of shit, well, i don't care less. Either way, i'm not awake at night anymore how to beat the game, while some of you might wake up at night all sweaty because they can't stop thinking how to beat this damn game.

 

My comment was referring to MJ.

 

I would be more healthy to look at things different from time to time, could be a very new experience.
But nobody takes the time to explore roulette in a different way, you all rather keep goin' around in circles, wich is fine. But if you really, really want to beat the game, you all gotta stop and go explore!

 

Of course, no one is obliged to prove anything. My point was that it is an easy argument to settle, if somebody wanted to (and more to the point if they were actually able to).

 

Yeah - but then it's easy (relatively) to figure out how you play. That's why it isn't done.
And regarding the bickering - i do not understand this either. I believe that for the most part these are (very) old men with very little willingness to accept or at least consider somebody else's opinion. Which makes this forum sort of useless.

I am not sure how TG is doing it but I firmly believe (here we go...) that he isn't cherry picking. Why should he? If I was him I wouldn't say anything but this is his decision. Somebody once said about drtalos that he's like a thief who really wants to tall about how he stole the crown jewels but for obvous reasons he cannot. Hence the riddles.

 

It's fine. Riddle away. But nobody is going to figure it out. Can't wait for the next contraption.

 

Yeah I’ve got no problem with anyone here, I’m an interested observer but don’t see much in the way of proof, which given how easy it would be to do, suggests all is not as advertised.
There is alot of openness on this site of methods so I don’t see how there any trade secrets to hide.

 

Weltrusten!...

 

I wouldn't say anything more than I have.

I don't understand TurboGenius decision. The same veteran posters swarm him every time. It's clear these naysayers are jealous someone can do it, they can't. Too bad.

 

Have you done some simple calculation, if the ROI is say 50% per session. Starting with 3000 balance how many sessions it take to get to the top of the table? Are you sure it's easy? How about the ROI is lower?

TurboGenius posted a 500 spins flatbet graph, it's not good enough?

No proof or refuse to accept TurboGenius's proof? And deny the effort to provide proof on RSim?

 

There are thousands of strategies on various forums. Collected any money yet?

 

I’m not refusing anything. What’s his username on there please?

 

Sorry what does that have to do with anything?

 

If you had a system that really worked, why would you need to be constrained to the 3k rated game, you’d use the big game 5k, 10k, 25k etc) when available, wouldn’t you?

 

Lol.
So it's more likely that I wasted God knows how many games (thousands ?) until I got a miracle 3k to 1
million result or is it more likely you are wrong.
That's crazy. Whatever keeps you from understanding why you are wrong I guess.

 

You mean a system with 10% ROI per session does not really work?

Now, how many sessions starting from 3000 to get to 1,000,000+ top of the leader board?

 

I can certainly do that, but of course it won't be the system that Turbo is actually playing, or it's unlikely to be. But he has form on doing this. He's posted charts which always appear to win where he has given full details of the method, and when anyone else tests, big surprise! They get losses. That being the case, why would you trust him? As I said, it's common to see sessions which show great profits over a small number of spins, and if the system is coded it takes no time at all to find them.

If Turbo REALLY wanted to prove that he always wins, there are ways of doing it without revealing the system. But he can't, so he doesn't.

 

Yes of course it works if it’s consistently 10% ROI every session. Where can I see this evidence please?

 

That 3000 to 1,000,000 in 500spins graph that TurboGenius posted.

I can't produce that roi graph on RSim. No way.

Ofc TurboGenius played his A game for that session. And we're smart enough to know he won't tell on forums, no?

TurboGenius message is it can be done.

I agree but not at that roi.