TurboGenius Gambler's Fallacy (absurd ?) Proof.

I don't see why it's an un-winnable argument. Turbo says you always have the advantage when betting as he suggests, and provides one example. Ka2 provides 100s of examples which shows that you don't. Is there a fact about the matter or not?

 

Do you know what a red herring is? What if Turbo is throwing you off trail in order to obfuscate his real tactics. I mean way off base. He shows charts of winning and then says things that are cryptic on purpose.

 

Homemade charts do nothing for me.

 

@geez you ain't even reading .. + irregardless of what math is, make it work in your favor.
otherwise, not being able to do that .. you can carry a full cargo of knowledge & something more .. & to what point, end!?

if you can win the worst, you can win everything else.

.. the mighty reader & eye-opener has to get his eyes opened.

 

What 100s of examples .. the worst one is winnable.

 

And so they shouldn't. How do you feel about masses of data?

 

Great idea. You can start by proving that 1 + 1 = 3.

 

Have not the slightest interest for stupidities ..

A guy has been given a GPS, never learned how to use it .. in his favor.
Still uses his compass in the hikes through the forest.
Does that invalidate or change a GPS system, no.

Math is a tool, not a determinating system. You of all should know that..
Now use 1/37 in your favor.


Again, you haven't even given a look deeper look of what I wrote, let alone used your precious math, algebra of all, slightly salted with logic, to calculate the way to win; thereof regurgitating stupidities.

Besides, once 9/16 unhits resolve & in positive, why push unnecessarily, especially in a hard variance - playing further is done only if still in the negative; restart with a new batch, morron, & pocket the money.



Knife doesn't lie either; you can make a lot of things with it & destroy too .. or you can point it to your hearth & push very hard. See, the edge kills ... If you are more hardcore start by oogling your out first. Now go & prove the knife has three prongs.


While at that, come & prove that I don't have two very hard balls.

No need, your father did that already. Better off he hadn't.

 

If it’s data from an independent source that can be scrutinised like RSim, where a user has no way of manipulating it then absolutely fine else no thanks

 

@ Klausy, couldn't agree more.

 

This was just a test. Not the best way to play it. Although i do advice to give it a try and pay attention while you play!!!! Because it does gives you a way to be in profit each session you play !!! ( without crazy betting or +400 spins)

Yes , i said each session!

Track 37 spins...write down the non hits ( 13ish)
Bet them when they appear with 1u. Each new cycle we double the units. When a new # comes into play you give it the same units as the rest. On a hit remove that # .
When to stop/reset? Never bet the last of anything so don't push it to far. Or when the hits come fast and enough profit is made.

Again this could be played much better with much more profit. But that You'll find out while you play

 

No need to double, plus 1 is enough. No it's not a HG, so don't bash on Denzie, if you fail. But this will win more then it loses, so yeah try it. And no, not the way i play.

 

Like i said before, play only the things that will happen, no need to guess.

 

And yes, the way denzie explained can easly be played in a bm setting. You only need a tracker. To bad ayk's site doesn't work anymore.

 

I only took the average if it went to or close 1:37 they stopped just as turbo's graph. The point is you can just start playing 14 random numbers and you get the same results! Dont take my word for do it yourself a few cycles will exactly show where the average is heading...1:37 so absolutly no edge! Past numbers mean absolutely nothing!

 

Contradiction of the year award.

So numbers that are behind will catch up.
Thank you.
I don't even have to post if you guys are going to argue by agreeing with me.

 

I really and i mean headpounding unbelievable that this isn't clear after all these years.
Everyone can run simple tests and see for themselfs that numbers who are behind will try to catch up and that you never play at the house edge, ever! why doesn't this sink in is beyond me.
Further more you are only playing a small pool of numbers instead having to fight up to 37.
is everyone blind or are you guys having fun to argue all day. Again, i really don't get it.

Will it always win? No
Will it win most of the time? yes
Can it be a very long session in a bm setting? yes
Should you stop when in profit? yes
Can you play multiple sessions at once? yes
Do you need a tracker? yes, will be handy.
Is this a HG? No

 

you are so right....dutchcrown.....denzie....turbo.....and who else knows......the best part it can be done on the evens....





ns

 

Pen and paper will do just fine

 

Unzip it and run the idex file with your browser.