TurboGenius Gambler's Fallacy (absurd ?) Proof.

No, it's correct. We're talking about the long term, so rate = probability. Long term doesn't mean the next cycle or even the next few cycles (37 spins), which is why betting on unhit numbers from the first cycle onwards doesn't give you any edge. Certainly not enough to overcome the house edge.

 

Correct ! It's a waste of time to demonstrate that to you. Why would anybody? Lmao

I guess the new normal is staring into the flame of a candle for an hour or so and then bet the fancy hocus pocus numbers that appear in our mind ... rofl

 

So what causes a few numbers to be the hottest in every 300 spins? That's a long term condition also. Sure, it changes from 300 spins to 300 spins. But while it is happening it's each 300 spin's hottest numbers. What causes this?

 

Where's the rest of the sequence .. that's incomplete data, MJ.
Give a method time to perform ..

Or rather, take one permanence out from Wiesbaden or Laroulette.it -- & either paste link or upload its file; then we can talk.

 

Let's tackle the example issue another way. I want to know how long ( on average) a hottest number lasts. If it is the hottest number in 300 spins then does it go on to still being very active, above the mean value of 1 / 37? Since it is logical to assume that it keeps going I wonder if it is like near 400 spins?

Someone could program a sim to accumulate enough data to get a very close to accurate value for how long hottest numbers stay hot. Has this already been done and if so does anyone have a number?

 

Well, not everyone can sprint 100m under 9, 8.5s .. but some can.

 

I'm asking this because you never know at what point you are coming across a hottest number's sequence. You could catch it at the start, the middle, or near the end. There must be a kind of nature to hottest numbers.

 

Yes, but how many can go hell bent for leather down a mountain slope at 95 miles per hour and drop off a cliff and do a turn on the landing? Enough can that everyone wants to watch it like watching a train wreck.

 

Accompanying each &bevery of your examples worked on -- same to others.

I am sure you'd agree that the mode you opted for does not leave any room for constructive conversation.

 

lol well thanks for confirming. You don't think there is any need for demonstration to prove your claim?

No demonstration = no proof/evidence

We can end the discussion right there.

Hindsight bias is a mistake many don't even understand they are making.

 

√ Laugh & smile.
Exactly, watch it .. but do it .. that's a whole another thing.

 

Here: Hahnenkamm:

 

I did. Only I did not get to do the Hahnenkamm. I ran the downhill at the world cup back in 1976. It had a cliff drop at 90+ MPH with a turn on the landing.

The point, even in gambling, is to live a full life.

 

No you can't. This discussion is not over. Chasing the hottest numbers will not go away and neither will speculation on things that continue. I provided everything anyone needs to find out for themselves. Results will not lie. The only person that needs convincing is yourself. You don't need a parade or news reels. You just need to be honest with yourself and keep track of your end results. You don't have to publish anything.

 

Oh gizmo I see you have not changed.

It's really not that hard. Just demonstrate your amazing winning super successful top of the range unstoppable victorious method then you would be king of the world.

Until then these are just claims.

 

Let's do that then. Either I will or anyone that trained and acquired the skills that a few have actually demonstrated. So how do I get people to fall on their swords just for you? What you are attempting to do here in debate is require a person to prove a negative. Human nature is predictable. Either nobody is skilled enough to beat the heck out of the casinos or you have a soapbox to stand on and display your spandex leotards.

 

I have highlighted MJ's wrong statement several times. If you fail to understand his error then that's too bad. Some people will never get it.

 

Does that mean you are willing to demonstrate it?

 

There's more coming, but why is it when Turbo posted his ONE chart showing great profit, nobody said "Give a method time to fail...". lol.

 

Ok , let me do 10000 sessions for you ....lol

TG did and guess what.....he won....but It's not enough spins, a fallacy, pretend game , ....they and you will always have some reason why the results are not legit....Yup, a waste of time