Roulette Is anyone beating this game consistently?

I was too. But nobody is going to believe that the Reading Randomness was his idea.

 

Anyway, you can take his teaching thread right now. Here it is: " ---- ." You just work on that for a while and then poof, you are a new man.

 

Let us turn to a new page . Let`s se what he does with the ONE number betting series.

Maybe he brings up the frozen number pick.


That might be the wave of the future . LOL.

 

Never picked up any teachings on forums .

Only Barstows principle of diminishing probabilities of repeating patterns of EC caught my attention .

 

I'm no longer a member at WoV, I resigned. Nathan do you know where I can find this teaching thread that Gizmo is talking about. I don't know how to find anything on this forum. The format is quite confusing.

 

Geez, let the trashing begin:

https://www.gamblingforums.com/threads/reading-randomness.14733/

 

I coined the term 'reading random' and you know damn well I did, that's why it always triggers you when I bring it up. Why it is so important to you to make everybody think you originated it is a mystery to me. I'm certainly not going to let you claim that it was your idea. Learning how to read the random outcomes in roulette is the key to beating roulade.

 

Welcome back Spike.

 

That didn't take long. So your method is reading trends? That is where newbies begin. You can win sometimes with trends if you're really patient. All your Fancy Dancy explanations for what's going on with them are just useless twaddle. But you knew that. You have really over thought this to an unnecessary degree. I see now why reading random is so important do you, you've made it kind of your Trade Mark. You're welcome, glad I could help out. I remember when I started writing about reading random you latched on to it like a dog with a bone. LOL

Like I said looking at trends and patterns will work sometimes if you get lucky. As a long-term method of play it's a loser. But I'm not telling you anything you don't know. I consider winning at roulette to be winning every session you play. And I'm not talking about 50 spin sessions. I'm talking about 10 and 15 spins.

 

Why do my posts keep getting flagged? I'm not selling anything, there are no bad links. I don't get it. I was trying to tell Gizmo that reading patterns is for newbies. It works if you have a lot of patience and if you're lucky but it's not worth it in the long run. There are way too many times when there is no random to read at all. What do you do then, twiddle your thumbs? Best to have a method where you can bet almost every spin and win every session.

 

You just ended up confirming that you don't know what is in the Reading Randomness thread. Thank you for your input. You have missed the entire point of the RR thread. And I think it is wonderful that you are clearly here to be what you have always been. The RR thread is completed. You can't wreck it. But you can make yourself look sort of like "WHAT?" What's wrong with this guy? LOL

 

Hi spike, nice to see you posting again.
Do you still split the number stream for your game? I'm considering trialling two number streams for my method, perhaps introducing it whenever a single stream is being difficult.

 

I just went to read another page and yup,
it's all about reading patterns and trends. You cherry-pick different sequences and then point out what happens in them. You like to pepper your explanations with gobbledygook catchphrases. At one point you say "I left Spike in the dust." Yeah, no. There are whole books written on exploding trends and patterns, what you are doing here is nothing new. You gave it away for free because it's not worth anything. You go to a brick-and-mortar casino with this and many times there won't even be any patterns to exploit. People have been using this method for hundreds of years and sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't. Just like everything else. Keep trying, you might get there eventually.

 

You need more than one stream
, playing just one stream is impossible. Not enough information.

 

More confirmation that you are completely unaware of what is written there.

So let's see if I have this right. You invented reading randomness and this is not what you invented. You would never trash your own idea that you need to get some recognition from. But it's as old as the hills. I'm actually glad that you came here to set everyone free and to show them how smart you are. So how long do you expect to tease people here and get them to chase a banana on a string? Just think about this. That thread went over 300,000 views last week. Now tell everyone that went there and studied, gained the skills suggested, and showed amazing results, you tell them what suckers they are and how you actually have the secret sauce ingredient for reading randomness. LOL

 

Oh, good. you got two streams. That makes you a two stream believer. Let's all sing that to The Monkey's 'Day Dream Believer.'

 

Where did I say
that chasing trends and patterns doesn't work. Whole books have been written on it. The problem is it's not dependable, it's not predictable. You can go to a casino that has four roulette wheels going at the same time and not find a single one of them that has any exploitable trends or patterns. And when you do find one there's no guarantee you're going to win. Because you have no idea when a trend or pattern is going to stop. Sometimes you will get lucky and have three winning sessions in a row only to be followed by four losing sessions. I know this way of playing like the back of my hand. Like everything else, sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. You will never ever be able to bet real money playing it as I'm sure you found out. Because you never know what's going to happen with a pattern or trend. Every single spin is independent of the last spin then it's really easy to forget that and think there is something else going on. There isn't. And that's the reason you gave this away for free, it has no value. There is nobody playing this in casinos making real money. Just when you think you have learned a rule that can be followed, nope, it's undependable. Everything that you think is dependable will eventually be undependable. There were people in Europe playing this way 200 years ago. If they really had something, if this way of playing really beat roulette, the game would have shut down long ago. It is still going strong.

 

I didn't say that, you inferred it.
I didn't say how many strings do I use.

 

There. Spike just confirmed that trends don't always work. So I guess you use trends and patterns in a way other than counting on them to work? Is that right Spike? I know. It's your secret.

This is comical. He comes here, reads a few pages, and now he knows what it is all about. What a massive embarrassment. Spike. You are a funny man.

 

You are right Spike, I inferred it. Knowing your capacity to concentrate like I do I'm guessing that three or four is your limit.