Roulette Is anyone beating this game consistently?

Just in case you might be interested in learning from the real author of Reading Randomness if you go there, uninterrupted by Spike, you will be shown examples of common trends or patterns that don't always work and what to do about it when they don't work. You will learn to use 6 independent streams of data simultaneously. You will be able to practice your skills at visual dexterity. You will know when to strike and when not to strike using common trends or patterns. You will gain knowledge it takes to beat the casinos and you, being the only one needing convincing, you will confirm your own success. You won't need to come here an convince anyone. At that point you will be the the living example of contradiction to anything Spike is trying to impress you with now. Because you will also have left him in the dust.

But, he is like seeing a strange animal in the zoo. You can watch him stumble and yet he will never tell his secret to using trends or patterns. Of course you won't need his secret.

 

I couldn't resist. Who got triggered?

 

What I do actually has value, unlike what you do. You act like you've discovered something brand new and you haven't. It's been around forever. And you say I'm an embarrassment. You are attaching rules to random outcomes. That's like the original example of trying to nail Jell-O to the wall. A profound waste of time. Where is this line of students you supposedly had singing your praises to the rooftops on how much money they've made with this winning system of yours. All I'm hearing is crickets.

 

That's all you are going to hear too. You are boring and it's just a waste of time to exchange disrespect with you. You think you know what is going on. You don't. I'm going to get smarter than you this time. I'm going to ignore you. You are nothing on these forums outside of conflict. You are just a clanking gong.

 

LOL, you sound exactly like John Patrick. This is the kind of crap he used to spew in his books. He also has chapters on exploiting patterns and trends, he mentions it all the time. If people want to waste their time with your method, it's their time to waste. I know first-hand it doesn't work long-term. And Gizmo knows it too. If he had something of value he would have either kept it to himself or made a bunch of money off a book. I bet you dreaded the day, Gizmo, that I came back on the gambling forums. I'm sure you thought it was never going to happen. Oops.. "I left Spike in the dust." Priceless...

 

You are probably better off doing that because you certainly cannot defend what you've done because you haven't done anything. Again, where are your Defenders, why are they not hear arguing your case. Where are all the students making boatloads of money following your rules for random outcomes. The sound of crickets is deafening. And I know that you know that I'm the one that coined the phrase 'reading random'. But it's not trademark so I will let you use it. LOL

 

Bbbwaaaaahhhhhhhh the spike and gizmotard are in conflict and both actually tryin to take credits for the random readings bulls shits! And who ever said that cats feudin ain't entertaining, hey hey.

 

was just thinking the same thing, a lot of hilarious mini-feuds going on the board right now, very good entertainment…

 

Q

Query, how do you know for certain or near certainty that yer winnings will continue once you transition to real cake wager from the virtual wager, hey hey????

 

Practice. If you are betting virtually and being honest about it it would have won if you had bet. If you're betting virtually and losing why would you start betting for real. You can look at something that looks perfectly legitimate for a series of bets and it's not. Everything in roulette goes in cycles, either the outcomes are playing your game or they aren't. If you virtual bet and see that they are playing your game it will usually continue for a while, sometimes for a great while. And if it's not playing your game that can last a long time too. But I'm sure Gizmo has covered all this extensively in his series Millionaire Roulette. LOL

 

Oh look. Spike uses virtual bets when waiting for a time that he likes. And he's coined another phrase too.

I have covered all this extensively in my free for anyone to view, and be told everything thread, Reading Randomness. Thanks for validating RR. I know that you are not a shining example of sharing and being honest though. But we will take it as an endorsment anyway.

Here are two pictures from my practice software. I won right off the bat with three different bet selections and then went right to virtual bets on just one of my groupings that is an independent data stream. This free to use by anyone software won't let you cheat. You have to be honest. And it keeps track of all your "VIRTUAL BETS" too. Now you didn't happen to coin that phrase too did you? This is funny. People know you and what you have been dropping hints about at WOV. You are being played like a Stradivarius violin. Enjoy it.

 

Let's see if Spike likes things that he can't redefine. He's so invested in being right, and the guru of randomness.



Best viewed in a full screen.

 

Wow, what a blast from the past. Spike & Gizmo back in the ring together. Hey Spike, still getting a 72% win rate on the ECs? With all that practice over the last 15 years you must be up to 92% by now. Are you living on your own private island?

This place is looking more and more like GG every day. Now all we need is Bago.

 

Wow, I forgot about that 72% The best that anyone ever demonstrated at the RR thread was 66%., Maybe there is something to that secret that he will never share. Course his basic arithmetic skills have always been sort of substandard.

 

Anyone posting a win rate above 60 % is either a politician or a liar .

 

Several people have already demonstrated 66%. They are not liars. Spike claimed 72% but never demonstrated this. Who knows? Maybe he got kicked out at WOV and didn't actually resign like he says he did. Suppose he decided it was time to demonstrate that he can get 72% in long term average.

 

EC are 100 % luck and % strategy. That is a well known fact .

 

So just like the RR thread teaches you must exploit luck. If you are having trouble with that, all wins streaks are by luck alone. Luck is always coincidental and is not caused by any magic. That leaves magical math and magical trends out. It always has.

 

Now for the good part. When you are in a lucky streak and using trends or patterns for your bet selections then these useless bet selections only appear to be showing you the win streak. They have no magical powers. But they are indicators of the appearance of the trend or pattern working temporaraly. You can use randomness against randomness and find the lucky streak. You can use only betting on red and find the lucky streak. You can have a pet set of numbers and find the lucky streak. It's not rocket science.

 

So we have Turbo G... with his secrets of cold or sometimes hot Numbers.
We have Nathan D... it's all luck in the EC's
We have Gizmo, who sold his Randomness for a couple of Bucks.. was it 1000 dollars ? In stockmarket you can earn this in minutes.
and proud of 300.000 viewers... Influencers talk about 100,000,000.

and now the new Star came from his grave......Spike..

wow... elite group .... and a couple of bucks, during the years