Roulette Measuring Success

You wrote this bolded statement. Yet you fail to deduce the edge is so large you don't need large sample testing.

Do you really understand what you wrote or merely copy and paste?

 

Have you noticed that Luckyfella and the reddiamanthe have the same manic style of writing gibberish? Are they perhaps sharing the same brain? I smell another Wendell.

 

I only wish I really knew what exactly Luckyfella is pin-pointing to with the tangent to put it in one word .. for sure.

& having access to that part of the brain of his.

That would enrich & transform something that already works consistently, with some very rare lapses off the great performance, into an ultimate weapon.


What a waste for society in general to always label & expunge those genius ones. What a herd ..

 

The level of gullibility in this forum is getting dangerously high. Genius? lol, well I guess there's no harm in sucking up to LF, TRD. Kiss his ass often enough and he might spill the beans.

 

I ain't a kissass & I'll never be .. just shows your lack of ability of adequately assessing the situation correctly .. of which effects most likely spread or spill over other areas too.

& its beyond any surprise that joe targets the credibility, his usual practice when he's lost for words.


I'd rather be killed on a spot first, remember that .. ahmm where's that button.

 

Next.

 

The other Dr call this silly & frilly .. go figure, off the board.

 

& similar

 

Psst...at 1 in 38 you're still going to lose money because the house only pays out at 35 to 1. There's just two too many numbers on the wheel.

 

Hahaha! How much does the house make when a bet is $0 ?

 

The only real difference is that in the opening if you hit you close the game, in the recovery you need more than one hit.

To obtain that (seems very easy to understand, but here we are) you do a sort of progression that allows you to recover the debt ..

fat/thin.

 

They call that chasing your losses.

 

I'll psst when you back off .. otherwise I'll be taking the bars one after another void -- a sort of progression shall be using the same amount of units; which is progressions' vertical dimension, while progressing in risk deeper into the districts with fewer numbers played .. that can be done with using its horizontal dimension using & alternating between expanding the number of positions or reducing'em.

So no, it ain't about chasing any losses or a silly girl or a pussy or anything like that .. shows the evolvement of the character & its strength. So anyway if one hasn't gone through sn alchemical transfiguration, which roulette as one of the possible realm offer, the info is most likely of no use these being simply signposts.

Combined that with unhit showing up late in revolutions, where the roulette is actually chasing its 1/37 1/38 dynamic equilibrium, with just one of the eg. unhit numbers worked as a group which is entering its congested interval -- in effect getting a better payout on it (first hit on more numbers, the other with the same vertical amount on fewer) -- .. & the thing works.


In addition, as clarification if I potentially haven't been clear enough yet, imagine one of them (grouped su) numbers entering its congested interval with more frequent hits .. doesn't it make sense that (at least) some of the next of its appearances result on the positions with a better payout; or if you play SU positions themselves with fewer of them?

 

The concept is contrary to chasing, in principle being namely the 'trapping' (or 'setting a trap' around) the wheel.

 

Money management/progressions can not turn a losing game into a winning one in the long run. If you can't win flat betting, then your system doesn't work.

 

It's a shame there is only a like button and not an electric shock one.

I guess you watch wobbly wheels for a million pins with your "winning ways", because as you proclaim anything less is insufficient.

 

In 40 spins, it is a 1 in a billion chance to get more than 11 numbers, or said another way it's 9 nines of confidence or 99.9999999% certain that within 40 spins no-one will get more than 11 hits.

You can work out the confidence in excel as follows:

Code:

=BINOM.DIST(11,40,1/37,TRUE)

Of course both myself and excel are wrong according to Dr Sir Dickhead because probability and their probability distribution function is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma.

And besides Dr Sir Dickhead says there are too many pockets and the maturity of chances fallacy means we simply cannot know or reason about probability.

 

There're formation options .. each impacting a system as a whole in different & various manners; contingent on the type of potion you wanna be using.

Eg1.
Betting only on the ≈surer (if I as using the best word here ..) opportunities alike

.. luckyfella is allegedly doing.

.. or thomasleor with his VRTech Fulcrum platform on the other forum.
https://www.roulettelife.com/index.php/topic,3444.msg65668.html#msg65668

which pays for the statistical advantage generated in time currency in terms of spins passed by at the table, or the simplest form of tracking.



Eg2.
L/H gear threshold continuous betting
as allegedly Gizmotron is using betting in low gear unfavorable & switching to high gear bets within favorable intervals; here the advantage generated is compensated partly with units paving the way & mostly with time.


Eg3.
same base unit continuous betting
which keeps churning in the profits within also so-called unfavorable intervals alike paying for the advantage gained with time in & with nominal amounts chips possible

[eg. more sophisticated parachute type of staking forget the linear classic parachute, that's just in principle the beginning of it if you want something real effective]

.. thus paying for the advantage occurring in equal measure throughout the game, may that be in/favorable intervals, with a slight progression in one of its many possible forms; in order to balance for this type of advantage investment, simply covering for the incurring house-edge or the tax of playing.

To put it simply, here the time-generated advantage is covered purely in units & thus the requirement of a slight progression to cover for the house edge induced disadvantage; alternatively, an option of purely flat bet to secured win exists, although resulting in practically unnecessarily much longer sessions (which would bring us back to the type of compensation being time-for-time).


Eg4.
by collecting loads upon loads of spin data to begin with, then processing that data to uncover & locate the potential advantage & who knows what else pertains to this + making actual use of that in the live play .. unless the advantage thus identified hasn't been already mitigated by nowadays already very sophisticated & by casinos rented tools; mind that this in the area I have next to none experience whatsoever & pretty much everything in this example is to & by me hearsay; so if there's any place I would be open listen to you @Dr. Sir Anyone Anyone would be herein


Eg5.
using a comp/camera .. initial capital investment comprising of materials (chips, board, ect.) + software development + collecting data & training the model (by AI or manually) + exposing the device to the target, including the risk of having the knees crushed in a quiet corner & never walking again may that be legal or not ..



Bottom line: the advantage has to be paid in one of many possible currency combinations, that arising with time passing or congesting only; which is what it has to be compensated for.

The target's in the archer & the act of training the weapon on it including pulling the string requires an investment of some sort for those to meet in the same space/time locus; the investment varies whether you're in movement on the horse, standing classically, shooting in-jump from in-between the legs, or using the pre-firmed crossbow awaiting to be unleashed ..