Roulette Is anyone beating this game consistently?

I called you a liar. You just make stuff up and use it to gaslight. Worst would be that you actually believe your own lies. Everyone has your number. You are chicken to tell anyone what was in your so called thread Reading Random way back in the lost days of Gambler's Glen. You make up lies that I would use it to sell it. But you are a lying chicken. I also noticed that you did not deny that.

 

Time to go back to ignoring you.

 

It just occurred to me. Spike just got done saying a few days ago that the casinos put up the past spin charts for suckers because they know that past spins are worthless. He used that to demean my use of playing charts back then. Now his argument is the casinos would consider them useful to beating them so they would not allow people to use charts.

This guy goes round and round dizzy in a circle.

All I have to do is teach people how to beat a coin flip session. They are given $1 chips and $10 chips. They then keep track of the strong side. I teach them how to get real good at the single characteristic of strong side / weak side. They place $1 bets when they can't see a strong side. When they see a strong side they bet on the strong side with the $10 chips as long as it remains a strong side. It's one skill. They can practice it with a coin. They don't need a chart. They just need to keep track of one thing. They can gamble all day long and take whatever they want. That method has nothing to do with patterns or trends. It's pure arithmetic. All you need as skill is the ability to add. Even snowflakes can add. Yes, I can send millions.

 

Do you realize that none of what you talk about is new, that it's literally been around forever? Do you want to learn how to play patterns and trends, play Baccarat for a while. If you see BBPPBB I guarantee most of the table is betting player. And if player wins they bet player again and player wins they bet Banker. And they'll keep following it till pattern trend ends. This is all you do in a nutshell. With all your fancy names and whistles and bells and Global this and global that, all you are doing is finding patterns and trends and hoping they last. The same as every baccarat player does. Because you cannot predict when a trend or pattern will start or when it will end all you can do is find one that's happening.
Look what I did, I made your super complicated super overdeveloped super long winded gambling system easy to explain. You're welcome. Send it out to your millions of followers and start closing the casinos down.

 

blah blah blah... Did you say something?

 

Yep. I just explained your entire system in very few words that everybody can understand. Because you absolutely cannot predict the beginning or the end of a pattern or a trend all you can do is find one that is already happening and hope it lasts for a few spins. This is ALL YOU DO with your convoluted system. You see red red black red red black red red black and you bet red hoping the pattern continues. That's it, that's your whole system of play. Prove I am wrong, you cannot. Because the outcomes are totally random you cannot know what the next spin will be so you cannot predict when a pattern or Trend will start or when it will end. You do what every baccarat player has been doing for 200 years and you think you've invented the Holy Grail.

 

Blah blah blah, what?

 

Here is a legitimate question. Suppose you see read read read black black black and next to it you see odd odd odd even even even. Which one do you bet on, red or odd. And why did you bet that way. I will tell you my answer after you tell me your answer. If you don't tell me your answer I'm not telling you squat.

 

Blah blah blah, huh?

 

Your loss, I was going to give you the right answer. I'm certainly not going to give it to you if you don't play along. I know you know what you would bet. And I will bet you it's wrong.

 

Okay Gizmo, here's an easy one. BBRRRBB and EEOOOEE. Which one do you bet and why. Come on you have a system that never loses give me the answer and I'll give you my answer. I've never done this before for anybody. You should feel honored.

 

You bet on NONE OF THEM you idiot.

The payoff is less than the true odds, therefore, no bet should EVER BE MADE!

 

lol now it’s a party

 

Wrong answer

 

B & E

 

Well, I know the question isn't for me, but I'm guessing gizmo would use his minimum bet, because neither EC is becoming dominant enough yet.
But I must say I can't see the point of the minimum bet, just bet nothing at all until you see the dominant side, unless it's just to stay at the table. But if you play live online roulette you don't have to worry about that.

 

Blah blah blah, does anyone hear the sound of a sewer truck?

 

No I thought it was the echo of a duck quacking. Cheers

 

I did try to play at Bovada out of Canada for a while. The most I could deposit at first was $50. I took that to around $1200 profit in just a day or two. I withdrew $700 of it and left the rest in there for playing. It's just a theory, because as an ancient shockwave internet programmer I could stich together video slices and change outcomes. The changed slices of video can be seamless with pre designed seams in all 37 or 38 numbers of the wheel. My guess is that they were completely caught off guard by my three pet groupings of EC bets. They didn't have a working algorithm in order to target me with. I wrote here about that experience about a year ago. But all of a sudden I lost every session I played there after that. They got the remaining $500 back. I never won ever again there. I will never play at an online casino that does not have live players at the wheel from anyone from the general public allowed to observe and confirm spin results. There are online places like that but I can never get in there with deposits. My only option is B & M. Spike is not sure why he is having a convergence of simultaneous losses. But it all fits with targeting algorithms. I went to another place that also used the same people for their live dealers and it was the same thing.

This can be tested if you are willing to create your own pet bets that the algorithm might not detect. You might go on a win streak. But their programmers will look for a consistent grouping and it will be possible for them to cheat you once they have your numbers. It's funny to. There tricky stuff might be so complex that they can't catch this stuff right off the bat. You would think that they would just wipe people out with a kill button. It's way too fishy for me. But my Reading Randomness technique has never encountered that many lost sessions before. It's just too much of a coincidence.

Don't bother Spike. You are on lifetime ignore.