Baccarat The Final Solution

I Have develop a MM only for even chances and for baccarat or even better for craps
my method can fight very difficult sequences close to sequences of hell
of course not HG but very inovative
it has 5 basic rules 2 of them very strong
i am thinking to post my MM here at SPUTNIK thread and not open a new thread
as mine contribution to Sputnik hard work
I have translated in excellend english language with a lot of examples
and explanations spin by spin all my bets
I Wonder if someone after reading understanding and like my MM COULD BE POSSIBLE
SHARE WITH ME JIMSKE VERSION ABOUT SPUTNIK METHOD
I THINK JIMSKE VERSION ITS ALL I NEED
About sputnik march i have understand all
BUT THE FINAL SOLUTTION THREAD I CANT UNDERSTAND ALL
CHEERS

 

Good luck , hopefully someone can help you out when you post. I’m sure jimske will help you out if it’s not a proper tertiary matter.
You may find it more useful to start your own thread as not to detract from the Sputnik hard work he’s put into this thread. You can link and direct readers to this thread if needed but this way Sputnik thread remains for the purpose he intended. Good luck and I look forward to reading your post. /thread. Cheers

 

So PM and we can talk more about this.

 

Can't go wrong following Patrick's work, one of the best minds in our "hobby".

 

Looking forward to it. Please post a link to the new thread here so we can access it.

 

Thanks for the nice words mention me.
I getting closer and closer to the ultimate variant where you just follow the flow with no interruption.

AsymBacGuy has a similar selection that I come up with based upon my March.
Hes way is to wait for a series of three or higher.
Then if you next get a single or a series of two you bet that one of them will repeat.
This gives you a W LW LW W LL W LL W LL LW W LW W

My way bet that one out of the two presents will repeat.
And it also starts after a series of two or three and higher.


222 W
223 W
221 W
232 LW
231 LL
233 W
211 W
212 LW
213 LL


333 W
332 W
331 W
323 LW
321 LL
322 LW
311 W
313 LW
312 LL

Another one that I also work on is narrowing down the strings to only two attempts.


222 W
223 W
221 W
232 W
231 W
233 W
211 LL
212 LW
213 LW


333 W
332 W
331 W
323 W
321 W
322 W
311 LL
313 LW
312 LW

Give an update when the complexity comes more clear after some testing.

Cheers

 

Patrik - you are waiting for a series to play out, then bet for another series twice. And then if that loses, wait for another series? That’s similar to how I play.

BBBPBP - this would be a losing series. You have your 3 B then L after P and loss after B. You would then wait until another series is started, which could be a second P in the next hand and then wait for a B to show in order to bet B for your next bet.

BBBPBBPPPBPPP is a LWWLW. Betting on P was a loss in hand 5. Betting on B in hand 6 is a win. Betting on P in hand 8 is a win. Betting on B in hand 11 is a loss. Betting on P in hand 12 is a win.

 

Let's look at the last sample and example with groups of LL
You have two out of three winning the second bet if a series is not followed by another serie.

BB P B P
BB P BBB
BB P BB

LL
LW
LW

Is not matter if you get a series of two or three and above - still one single bet.
That reduce the three losing attempts into two attempts.

I tackle the variance in the short term and still testing.

Cheers

 

Yes indeed! I do very much enjoy shortening the losing sequence!

 

One thing that I will test is to avoid the black swan or sequence from hell.
Let's say we have 16 versus 2 combinations where 2 stand for the LL sequence.

Then I am thinking zig-zag where we would hold and not bet when a losing sequence appears and strikes with no end.
This way we would not be a victim of several losses in a row.
And only bet after a fictive win where we would have a bet favouring us with 16 versus 2 for each attack.

Current testing groups of three.

I Will post some stats.

Cheers

 

I am so happy that I got the big drawdown when collecting stats to explain the LW-Registry and how to tackle loses when they chop.
First, we see nice winning to chop in our favour and then comes the black swan.

332 W
222 W
213 LW
221 W
322 W
212 LW
231 W
331 W
231 W
311 LL
212 LW
312 LW
311 LL
333 W
323 W
212 LW
213 LW
212 LW
321 W
221 W
323 W
332 W
311 LL <<< LL
211 LL
211 LL
311 LL
211 LL
211 LL
323 W
211 LL
311 LL <<< LL
231 W
212 LW <<< LW
223 W
331 W
212 LW
311 LL
313 LW
231 W
332 W
212 LW
232 W
321 W
331 W
221 W

The result becomes - LL LL LW - using the zig-zag strategy to handle long sequences from HELL (The Black Swan)
The size of the losing chops would be almost a whole shoe.

Cheers

 

Correction:
Made a typo error above - the second reducing bet LL should be after the first win.

Cheers

 

The zig-zag solution creates losses in the other direction - need to determine if to skip or tweak.
I will collect more stats to see what is common distribution


WWWWWLWLWWLLLLWLLWLWLLLLWWWWWLLLLLLWLWWLWWLWLWLWLLW


221 W
223 W
223 W
321 W
331 W
313 LW
212 LW
223 W
311 LL
211 Hold Bet
231 Fictive Win
311 LL
231 Fictive Win
233 W
311 LL
212 Fictive Win
332 W
312 LW
211 LL
233 Fictive Win
211 LL
311 Hold Bet
312 Fictive WIn
232 W
331 W
233 W
232 W
221 W
211 LL
211 Hold Bet
231 Fictive Win
211 LL
322 Fictive Win
211 LL
232 Fictive Win
323 W
212 LW
233 W
212 LW
231 W
322 W
212 LW
212 LW
313 LW
222 W
211 LL
221 Fictive Win
332 W

 

Yes @cps10 . Shortening the losing sequence is the if you cannot win more hands than you lose and overcome the commission at the same time.

I don't know that the March does this for doesn't do it. Maybe someone has running up numbers to determine that. What I have found through some limited data is there a JK 7 column method reduces 5 LIAR. But that's another thread. I'll make some comments on this one next.

 

@Jimske shortening to below 5LIAR would be ideal. That would make my series betting MM almost foolproof. UNLESS you have multiple losing streaks in a row. Then you just have to cut bait.

@Sputnik my betting series would win 14 units there less commissions. Even a zig zag like that can still win.

 

I have played around with Sputnik March before on paper and live.

I don't play patterns like a lot of guys do but when playing March it's obvious that your real friends are shoes that have a lot of repeats with few singletons.

Shoes with a lot of singletons can be difficult if not real trouble. Here's one: 3121212111. You play that out I think you'll see you get 5 losses in a row. So in shoes that don't change their stripes one could be in real trouble. Fortunately most shoes to change.

So you really need a staking plan for betting to recoup. And I guess you got to notice what kind of signatures give you trouble. Here's one right in front of me as an example. L W LLLL W L W LLL W.

 

This Thread is about Sputnik mechanical March.

Go ahead and post your bet selection on another thread.

 

That looks brutal. I do use a series betting method to help offset shoes like that. And you are right. They are usually the exception not the rule for those singletons

 

The Bias

Here are variant one - pretty solid results - I considering playing this one next weekend at my local casino.
Over 6 shoes and the biggest drawdown two losses


332 W
222 W
213 LL
221 W
322 LW
212 LW
231 LL
331 W
231 LL
311 W
212 LW
312 LL
311 W
333 W
323 LW
212 LW
213 LL
212 LW
321 LL
221 W
323 LW
332 W
311 W
211 W
211 W
311 W
211 W
211 W
323 LW
211 W
311 W
231 LL
212 LW
223 W
331 W
212 LW
311 W
313 LW
231 LL
332 W
212 LW
232 LW
321 LL
331 W
221 W
221 W
223 W
223 W
321 LL
331 W
313 LW
212 LW
223 W
311 W
211 W
231 LL
311 W
231 LL
233 LW
311 W
212 LW
332 W
312 LL
211 W
233 LW
211 W
311 W
312 LL
232 LW
331 W
233 LW
232 LW
221 W
211 W
211 W
231 LL
211 W
322 LW
211 W
232 LW
323 LW
212 LW
233 W
212 LW
231 LL
322 LW
212 LW
212 LW
313 LW
222 W
211 W
221 W
332 W

Here is variant one

222 W
223 W
221 W
232 LW
231 LL
233 W
211 W
212 LW
213 LL


333 W
332 W
331 W
323 LW
321 LL
322 LW
311 W
313 LW
312 LL

 

Above was lucky variance - will post more stats tomorrow.

Cheers