TurboGenius When does it lose ?

Here is a very simple game for the mathTards. It's implemented as do the impossible. It uses math too so you can snuggle up to it.

Simple rules. You must place a bet on every trial, be it a deal, thrown dice, or spin.

You have two bet values. You can bet $1 or $5.
... I know, it's an Indian casino in the boondocks.

This is meant to be won so you must play to win.

You place bets at $5 when you are in at least an 80% phase of winning bets where 20% of the time you lose bets.

When you fall below that 80% threshold you must bet $1 until it rises back above the 80%.

You must use staggered interlocking overlays of past results to constantly look back only 10 spins to get percentages of wins.

This is a fixed rule system. You can't deviate from the math or the intervals.

Now blow that smoke up your kazoo.

 

It's amazing just how much you can see with your head up your ass.

 

So anyone who isn't a mathtard must be what?... a retard?

 

Cut the crap.

Wait for Turbo set his account to public,

Then throw rotten tomatoes, eggs, spit on him,

and throw rocks if you need to.

Can't you guys wait?
Don't type anything until Turbo act?

 

Look you can yell all you want. TwoUp was presenting maths as it would give you an edge. We only agreed with him and said do the calculation (Flat betting) and it clearly gives you no edge.

So in all honestly, please tell me, what are we doing wrong??? By also presenting facts. We get blamed on... we are naysayers...idiots...retards... what have you... And yet all we do is as you presenting facts, which clearly you can recalculating yourself.

I question you again. Does the facts presented here then give you an edge?

 

Anyone that is a retard must be a retard.

 

MJ are you saying that roulette is unbeatable? Or is this just an argument against 'a number is due'.

I agree with most of what you have said in the thread but I just want to understand your overall position regarding roulette. Are you an AP player?

 

You are doing the angry yelling.

I'm just having fun. Lol

I wrote EVERYONE is looking for handouts.
Ofc you deny.

TurboGenius don't set your account to public. Lmao!!!

Let's put it this way,

There are many members in forum history who claimed they have their winning system betting.

If YOU haven't found this winning bet, then

YOU might be doing something wrong.

But YOU refuse to consider this point.

Instead you chose to waste time post all those naysaying posts.

The real question to ask YOURSELF is,

How's your naysaying post help you find the winning strategy?

If you don't believe there's exist such a thing, that's fine. Still why all the naysaying posts that gain YOU nothing?

Do YOU realise Your aggressive naysaying posts chased away all those who know how to win to stop posting on forums?

 

No... wait...

Anyone that is not a mathTard must be normal or above average.

 

I would have answered some of the questions posed on here.

But due to the aggression why bother.

Now YOU understand why I don't respond.

My lack of response irritates people. Lol

I did respond few times, but people hate my answer.
So how, tell you answers you like to hear? Lol

 

No... Wait...

Anyone that is a mathTard is a loser. They can prove that mathematically. And they look funny too. .. pen protector, tape on the glasses, mom still dresses them.

 

Partly against that, but also against the idea that you can use 1/37 to generate a +ev. If you get that, you MUST have made a mistake somewhere along the line. All calculations return a negative result.

I try to be, but I'm not in the same league as Dr Sir and Benas. Even LF says you need physics.

 

Sorry Gizmo, nerds rule the world.

 

Ofc, you can't simply pick winners out of thin air. Oh yes, that magic voodoo crystal ball. SirAnyone favourite word, gypsy. Lol

 

Yes, and look what a fucked up world it is.

 

I wouldn't say that. And all the fuck ups are due to lack of nerdiness. For example, the top nerds told us global warming was happening decades ago, but the anti-nerds ignored it, so now we're up shit-creek. Probably a bad example, lol.

 

Sure you can. Is there a math law that says you have to pick right?

You can pick any number out of thin air and track exactly how effective that pick has performed using math skills. You can know exactly when it goes above average and when it goes back to below average. What math won't tell you is when you will figure out a way to exploit that. I predict never because you are hyper focused on ballistics and broken wheels. Now that is a perfect execution of an algorithm in logic. You will never try beyond wheel hunting and ball movements.

 

You actually believe all that doom and gloom crap designed to redistribute wealth? Nerds that believe and use "garbage in and garbage out" science, confirmation bias, and Nazi cancel culture tactics deserve what's just around the bend. It's all falling apart because your Progressives pulled the trigger 20 years too soon. Just ask Nancy Pelosi if she like losing elections. Nerds. What a load of crap.

 

And I would have bet on the numbers which hit. I guess that makes me a winner, lol.

 

@ Gizmo, well I said it was probably a bad example, but even the Republicans are accepting it now. And FWIW, my politics is right of centre.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/13/climate/republicans-climate-change.html