Roulette gamblers glen

That alone changes the odds on inside bets while the same column or dozens sleeps. It's a combo bet. They change the payoff so much.

 

Everybody is playing their own game, even the ploppies have a game. It's usually to cover as many numbers as they can so they can win something, that's their game. How hard is it to pay attention to the number board and see which column or dozen is sleeping and not bet on it. When you do that, when you cover all the numbers except the ones that are sleeping you now have a guaranteed win, essentially. Unless the zero hits. Because one of the non sleeping numbers is it going to hit and you're going to win something every time that dozen or column keeps sleeping. Have I ever seen anybody do this? Hell no. It's too easy. Even easier to just bet on the dozens or columns themselves but a lot of people don't even know those bets exist. All they see is the big payoff numbers.

 

I don't know how else to describe this. It's streaky all over my chart. Now these situations only last like one or two spins. When the reds, odds, high18, or any combination like that from all three table layout bets all converge at the same time for an example you can bet just those 4 or five numbers. You bet all the red, odd, high18 numbers. I pile on to them when I go for it and bet 4 times as much as my regular attacking bet. What I mean is that if my big bet is $100 then I put $25 on each of the four numbers in the three way combo bet. If it losses it's no worse than losing one big bet. But if it wins it's like winning two or three sessions all on one spin. You would be surprised how many times that bet wins. My practice software is made to practice two way and three way combo bets.

 

In a casino like the MGM in Vegas that in the evenings has 4/5 roulette tables going, you can wander around look at the number boards for sleeping dozens and columns. Just look at the last six outcomes and if a column or dozen is missing bet on the other two. Win or lose move on and look for another bet. More often than not you will end up in profit at the end of an hour. 12 number sequences will sleep longer and more often then the 18 number even chance bets for obvious reasons.

 

Going back that far, its easy for me to guess "somewhat", my questions. I was a rookie and I remember asking MANY questions to MANY members regarding this game. I didn't know s**t so I asked for lots of advice/opinions. As far as the exact whereabouts of those questions.... I have no idea.

Ken

 

lol, YEP !!

Ken

 

Thats right and you are correct, he is a nice guy, no doubt. His style goes against everything I do.

ANY method I test/practice at home, **MUST** be playable under ALL casino (B&M) conditions !!!

Fast spins? Thats fine but the method (bets) must be calculated and all chips on the felt in SECONDS. Why test a Marty with the highest bet at 300K if its not realistic?????

Ken

 

It's not unusual for a table to have a sleeping column and a sleeping dozen at the same time. If you're looking at 5 tables in an hour's time you might find as many as 15 bets you can make, maybe more. Get 11 right and 4 wrong and you made a profit. I saw the first column on the Evolution wheel last night sleep for 18 spins. Not that uncommon. You also quite often see red odd and black even sleep for awhile. It's not unusual to look at a number board that's displaying 12 numbers and not see a single red odd number. I've seen black even red odd both sleep or 12 or 15 spins.

 

Since when have you and Spike become bum-chums,the amount of abuse you hurled at him and vice-versa when he joined the forum,now look at the pair of you.

Probaly the same person crying for attention ,when you read the amount of BS the both of you have posted in roulette forums going back years and years.

 

Like is not the criteria. I doubt they can stand each other in the Same room.

Just because you don’t like someone for their personal traits etc

Doesn't

Mean you cannot acknowledge that they have something use to say or have said on a subject.

Personally I’m on record as not thinking much of many people this forum

But
And I’m a shallow one dimensional guy at the best of time, I might add I’m not racist as I actually hate everyone, man woman or child, non specific genders equally regardless of race creed or religion. Cover everyone tick that box yeh !! I digress.

I’m the first to say that was a good post , relevant information etc. because it is , the person that posted it maybe a lowlife in my/ your opinion but that doesn’t and should not detract from the fact that that person has posted a excellent post.

Try growing up , being an adult. Acknowledge good posts regardless of the poster.
I think you will find that’s the case in example between gizmo and spike.

But hey
I’m one dimensional. Cheers

 

That's called syncing of two clashing egos each having its own vector at the core quietly admiring each other, two comets entangling after a long time -- magnificent to observe.

 

Gizmo and I have far too much in common to bother to argue about the trivial stuff. We moved on. That's what adults do you know. Or maybe you don't.

 

It's simple. Gizmo and I have far more to gain by being nice to each other than by being jerks. No matter what the rest of you think; him and I are on the same page when it comes to roulette. Why would we care what anybody else thinks about that.

 

I'm the same way on any forum. There might be one or two people where I care what they think about me, but that's usually about it. If somebody makes a good post I also will tell them it's a good post no matter what I think about them. But that doesn't happen very often.

 

I missed all this. Geez! Somebody likes us better fighting. Try this. Spike came up with the idea to call this Reading Randomness. He also found a better way to say referring to what I have said for years was the effectiveness states. I like "waiting for it to be playing your game." It makes it relatable. It does it without explanation. Now you have more evidence that reading randomness is worth your trouble to consider. It's not a phase to go through on your way to discovering a working method. It's the end of the journey. I don't get deep into Dr Sir AA because he probably can beat the casinos his way. I think that perhaps Turbo can too. I don't consider either of them as still going through a phase on a way to what they have been searching for.

As far as being concerned about getting acceptance from anyone that refuses to consider it I could care less. It's not the people that reject it that matter. It's the people that consider it and succeed that matters. Watching people try to make mechanical contraptions like a system work use to interest me. I don't care if they actually succeed or not. I just don't believe that they will unless they include a factor for when to apply pressure and when to back off in their rule based systems. Now when it comes to watching people destroy themselves and even die trying it I get a huge kick out of that. If you have to ask why then you just don't know what I have been doing for more than 40 years. I respect experts that die. I don't respect suckers that die without paying their dues first. It's really that simple. Your skill could be businessman. It could be musician. It could be professional. I respect the work that you put into getting there. It could be in being one of the few best extreme skiers in the word. Perhaps a rock climber. It does not matter. You could be a person that has written a hit song that will go on past their lifetime. Both Spike and I broke the ground that Reading Randomness represents. It stands on it's own. It will just have to pass the test of time for it's worthiness. What matters is not what we think of each other or what people think of it on these forums. It's what happens to the world if we are right.

 

Back on GG I used to say that I invented a game that I'm playing within in the outcomes of roulette. But it doesn't work all the time so you have to wait for the outcomes to be playing that game. This is not an unusual thing, people make up all kinds of games that they play in circumstances that have nothing to do with their game. They make up games they play with the colors of the cars on the freeway coming at them from the other direction. They make up drinking games for all kinds of things they see on TV. It goes on and on. I know the patterns and the trends we see in roulette aren't real, they don't really exist. But I choose to treat them like they're real in order to play my game. There are lots and lots and lots of rules surrounding this but none of them are really rules because they're all written in the sand, they can change on a dime. So your rules have to be very fluid. Too many times people develop a method or system and the rules are way too strict for roulette. You cannot make the game bend towards you, you have to always accept what random is and you have to almost teach yourself to think randomly about the outcomes. That way you can anticipate what's coming. Sometimes I'm so accurate it blows my mind. And when it's not playing my game it's a disaster. The other day I set aside $20 and said I'm going to play this section that I shouldn't be playing because it's not playing my game just to see what happens. You have to do this with real money you can't do it virtually. I tried, I give it my best shot and it took me half an hour but I lost the whole $20. Not a surprise. Imagine you have no idea how to see what you should not be playing. That would be the average player who thinks he's doing great and then gets hit with a sledgehammer and has no idea what just happened.

 

For me it's goes like this. I play with $1 chips and bet any trend that looks the best. It will go on being mild and worthless or it will start to lose a lot so I start betting other trends or patterns. I'm probing the actual live game in person. Once it starts to work I switch to $5 or $10 bet levels using stacks of $1 chips. So my cheap bets are from $5 table minimum to $18 if using inside groupings with specific numbers in sets, $1 each. But when it starts working I attack. I've been doing this for decades. You never know in advance what is going to happen. You just wait and attack. This latest stuff of using rigid stop points for wins or losses is just to prove that it works in a controlled experiment. ND said, if you want more, use a bigger bankroll and larger bets. It's that simple too. All that is explained in the RR thread.

 

Good post , so many cannot get this into their toolbox, they really lack the finesse of a subtle touch. Most just want to bludgeon the game into submission, forever trying to make something that is not happening, happen.
Guess that’s the self gratification instantaneous world they live in . You can’t harvest something that’s not there. Cheers

 

Gizmo. “Waiting for it to be playing your game” , many can’t get this concept at all.
Thank god for that.
And the mathtopian want to protect the ploppy,lol
also from another post of yours about the mathtopian needing to evolve to the next level, very astute but no push back so far from them , interesting. Cheers

 

This spike guy claims 72% strike-rate on roulette so as you play at live online casinos on your computer, record the next ten sessions you play and post them on You tube.

Then we can see the evidence of you winning at that rate in the long term.
Just press the windows button and g to be able to record video, all the best.