TurboGenius Turbo, do you remember the discussion on how to select the repeat?

Sometime I really wonder why some would take so much time out of their life to put down someone else"s methods of play with ways of thinking just because they dont agree with year after year ? could it be because they have a "certain agenda" in keeping players from winning ?

what could it be ,specially because they never offer anything to the table ? so much time wasted on trying to prove someone wrong is highly suspicious . reminds me on the "penny stocks' ,'pump and dump" forums where the sole Jobs of some is to dis-harms any one to pursue the truth and to keep them from actually winning. casinos are, after all , a Billion Dollar Industry. so lets keep on telling all these idiots that it is and never has been a beatable game or we could have a real crisis on our hands .
<

 

I'm shorting Turbo's systems. I stand to make a fortune form it!

 

You are right - casinos are places where simply give money.
It's a bit like canteens where they feed homeless people, only in a casino you get money instead of soup - you get as much as you ask for.
I also don't understand why people go to work, they can just go to the casino and take as much money as they need...

 

Your claims are just that, your claims. They don't prove that his system works. The math, logic and common sense indicate that it can't.
If you truly believe his system works, then explain the system step by step and why you feel it works. And please, no horses.

 

Lol.
Explain it to me, all the details. Lol.
You truly are a strange one Sir Anyone.

 

I

I know its's correct and I know it works, perfectly. I will explain it to Turbo, its's his system and right to do as he pleases with it.

 

I wrote I flatbet outside bet on any wheel any casino to win, ofc nobody believe.

Even if I play it on rsim, post the chart people still won't believe.

People won't believe unless you show it to them. Hand it on a silver platter for MJ to test then he believe. No math explanation required.

That's the standard of proof. Lol

To those who still believe, it's got to do with birthday paradox math and the clear hint I gave link posted on TRD thread.

 

What was the name of the guy that played Turbo's system for a while and ended up losing a fortune doing so? Was it Jek something? He posted here. He was a big Turbo fan until he got hit with a dose of reality.

 

What science are u using,can you elaborate?

 

Dr sir noone noone ,lol

 

Cant stop loling

 

He's using physics. Somewhat like what Dr. Claude Shannon and Dr. Edward Thorp worked on. Like "The Eudaemonic Pie".

 

Yum. I think I'll make a eudaemonic pie for Christmas.

 

SirAnyone and Benas are bs guessing.

What's worse is MJ and Benas were not aware of the role of pde in prediction when I mentioned it. Lol

 

Speaking of pies, my wife now makes me chocolate French silk keto pies with walnut crusts that are are friggin amazing! They taste better than a regular one without all of the carbs and sugar.

 

I guess she's gonna put a lot of extra special effort this time around since you posted that.

 

I just made a Keto avocado pie for Thanksgiving. I made it with avocado and cream and sweetener and tara gum in the blender it comes out really thick and I poured it into a keto crust and when it comes out of the fridge next day it's as firm as a cheesecake. It was really really good and very subtly sweet and rich and decadent

 

I don't think Dr Dame Anyone Anyone reads these forums.

 

It's a piss-poor analogy for the game of roulette because all outcomes are equally likely. Unless you're talking about making a wheel unbalanced, somehow. Then it works.

A better one is playing darts. If you want to predict where the dart will land, what's the best way to do it? A darts player in touch with reality will take account of the distance from the board, the velocity at which the dart leaves your hand, the angle at which it's released, the weight of the dart, etc. ie, Physical variables.

The system player is like the darts player who ignores all this, and doesn't even bother to take proper aim at the board. Instead, he records the positions at which previous throws have hit the board, and maybe their sequence. He then tries to identify a pattern which may suggest where the next dart will land, or takes an average of how many hits have landed in a certain radius, and "predicts" that the next dart will land inside it.

Notice that the "AP" player doesn't need to take account of previous throws (except perhaps to adjust his variables, and even then it's only last throw), because they have no bearing on where the dart will land. He concentrates on where the dependency is -- the physical variables. He's only concerned with the next throw (the initial conditions). Past conditions or throws are completely irrelevant.