Baccarat Anyone tried Galactic Baccarat by Michael Watson?

Cool, got it)

 

[QUOTE = "cps10, post: 126099, member: 2057"] Não uso esse método, mas colocaria uma seleção de valor de aposta menos agressiva em vez de um Marty. Eu normalmente uso um programa moderado de apostas em séries, mesmo para apostas Chance. Eu expliquei isso aqui recentemente. Faça o melhor de três ou cinco apostas usando sua unidade base. Se você ganhar a maioria deles, fique parado. Se você perder a maioria, aumente em uma unidade para a próxima série. Se você ganhar a maioria em uma série de apostas mais altas, desça. Se você atingir um novo máximo no lucro, redefina para a unidade base. Muito conservador, mas muito eficaz.

Se você perder dois de três em uma unidade, perderá 1 unidade. Se você subir e ganhar dois de três em duas unidades, você agora está à frente de 1 unidade e pode voltar a 1 unidade de sua base. É como o método da escada, mas em série. Eu tenho outras pequenas regras lá que eu coloquei para salvaguardar ainda mais, mas este é o esquema básico que eu usaria. [/ QUOTE]

Interesting!

I read all the reviews and understood the method.
But I would like to know if you have any start to follow player or bankroll. Or is it just going on intuition?
Because if you lose 3 or win as 3rd first out of 5 bets you'll come back or skip a level, but then again? I believe there is some trigger for this.

 

There are no real triggers. I go with intuition like you mentioned. Cheers!

 

I was just curious what his original bet selection was. You said randoms and opposites. How did he choose his bets exactly?

 

He has a charting method. Strings of Opposites and "Same" as he calls it or S and O's columns. He tells you to go on Random dot org, get intergers numbered 1 to 16 and place them on the charting for S and O's. And of course when you place the numbers in the charting, you put them in a random order, he calls this "beating random with random". Ill attach the charting below so you can get an idea of what it looks like.

Of course I tested it and found there was no real difference between waiting for 2 random sequences of player/banker to show up or waiting for 2 player or bankers to show up and betting the opposite.

The progressions are sound, but the charting in my opinion is unnecessary and time consuming..not to mention your betting opportunities are drastically reduced while you wait for 2 losses in a row of a random sequence...whereas now I simply look at any table, see 2 bankers or 2 players in a row and bet opposite. The 2 bankers or players are the "losses" I was waiting for to start my betting sequence.

P.S. You will see in the charting below, 2 rows of single S and O's...those indicate if you are going to bet same or opposite of the S and O' columns of 7 above. Also the numbers at the bottom (7,13) for example indicate which S and O columms you will use on the right of the chart. 7 in example below be S in the single S and O's rows. 13 would be the sequence SSSOOSS in the columns of 7 above. Then you use that sequence of S and O's to place your bet. You wait for 7 hands in the beginning of the shoe..no bets. Then start charting...you are looking back 7 hands in the past to know what you are betting now. Keep in mind the numbers on the botton of the chart and for the S and O columns are constantly changing, as you would go to random dot org and get new numbers (1-16) in random order for every shoe to keep it in "true random" as he calls it.

P
B
P
P
B
P
B (7 hands, now start charting)
(Remember we are looking at 7 hands in the "past". So if it says S for same..we take the same results what happened 7 hands ago and so on.

S (P) (Same as result from 7 hands ago)
Y (B) if we lose these 2 sequences then we start our progression
S (our history says to bet Player)
O
O
s
s

let say next hand was

P

Then we can add the results from 7 hands ago to our S and O column as I did above.
So now we can start betting for real now that we have had 2 losses in a row. History, as I mentioned above says to bet player.

Lets say next hand was

P (+1) Thats it, you won, now moves onto the next column of S and O's and start over.

(If you lost you move up the progression betting same or opposite depending on what S and O column you are using.)

As you can see...a little time consuming and maybe complicated when you first hear it, but practice would make it second nature..

You can test it out for yourself. It works just as well as betting opposite after 2 Player or Bankers, but again..in my opinion, the charting is unnecessary.

Any clarification, let me know...

 

Posting again...last one came through jarbled for some reason.

He has a charting method. Strings of Opposites and "Same" as he calls it or S and O's columns. He tells you to go on Random dot org, get intergers numbered 1 to 16 and place them on the charting for S and O's. And of course when you place the numbers in the charting, you put them in a random order, and calls this "beating random with random". I'll attach the charting below so you can get an idea of what it looks like.

Of course I tested it and found there was no real difference between waiting for 2 random sequences of player/banker to show up or waiting for 2 player or bankers to show up and betting the opposite.

The progressions are sound, but the charting in my opinion is unnecessary and time consuming..not to mention your betting opportunities are drastically reduced while you wait for 2 losses in a row of a random sequence...whereas now I simply look at any table, see 2 bankers or 2 players in a row and bet opposite. The 2 bankers or players are the "losses"

PS. You will see in the charting below, 2 rows of single S and O's...those indicate if you are going to bet the same or opposite of the S and O' columns of 7 above. Also the numbers at the bottom (7,13) for example indicate which S and O columns you will use on the right of the chart. 7 in example below be S in the single S and O's rows. 13 would be the sequence SSSOOSS in the columns of 7 above. Then you use that sequence of S and O's to place your bet. You wait for 7 hands in the beginning of the shoe..no bets. Then start charting...you are looking back 7 hands in the past to know what you are betting now. Keep in mind the numbers on the botton of the chart and for the S and O's columns are constantly changing, as you would go to random dot org and get new numbers (1-16) in random order for every shoe to keep it in "true random" as he calls it.

P
B
P
P
B
P
B (7 hands, now start charting)
(Remember we are looking at 7 hands in the "past".

(P) (Same as result from seven hands ago)

(B) (If we lose these two sequences Then we start our progression)

(the history says to bet Player)

lets say next hand was

P

Then we can add the results from 7 hands in August to our S and O column as I did above.
So now we can start betting for real Now that we have had 2 losses in a row.

Lets say next hand was

P (+1) Thats it, you won, now moves onto the next column of S and O's and start over.

(If you lost you move up the progression betting same or opposite depending on what S and O column you are using.)

As you can see...a little time consuming and maybe complicated when you first hear it, but practice would make it second nature..

You can test it out for yourself. It works just as well as betting opposite after 2 Player or Bankers, but again..in my opinion, the charting is unnecessary.

Any clarification, let me know...

 

I appreciate you taking the time to explain this. It is funny how some people come up with these super complicated bet selections that are no better or actually worse than the simple ones. I have seen this so many times with other ideas that people send to me. Thanks again.

 

No problem. When I first heard the concept "beating random with random" it was intriguing. Then I realized that 2 bankers or 2 players in a row is also a random event, llke a coin flip, so why not just bet the opposite with the same progression? Haven't looked back since. There are many methods to beat the game, thats why I always keep an open mimd to other ideas.

 

Another nice day at the casino) +21 units. $5-$30k limit table, with quickly delt shoes, no commission or collection.

 

1 to 6000 spread on that table, very generous. Everybody keeps telling me that baccarat minimums are now $25 and $100 since the casinos opened back up but obviously not everywhere. How long have you been playing like this?

 

There are lots of places that have $10 minimum bets in california for baccarat, more rare to find ones that offer $5 minimum bets. But yes some are $25, $50, and $100 minimum tables, just depends on the casino.

I started playing baccarat since 2015, been doing pretty well ever since. Although playing the way I do now was developed in my first year of playing. Of course, there are many ways to play and win, mine is just one idea.

I attached a few shoes I played years ago give you idea how complicated my charting used to be . So much easier now, just tracking bets, wins and losses.

 

Hi, I am bit confused the shoe in the Screenshot there are 6 players in a row from #3-- 8 ( excluding ties) , then how are u winning the 1st bet on player without progression , BTW in any shoe it is Common to see streaks of 7, it will be a bust,loss of 31 units, kindly Clarify, thanks

 

I understand your confusion, so let me clarify. The 21 units I won came from 2 shoes I played, so the results on my scorecard jare ust blended together from 1 shoe to the next.

The screenshot you saw posted was just an example of a shoe in the casino to show bet limits etc. Most casinos don't want you taking photos inside, so you have to be incognito, thats why you might notice a few hands shaved off in beginning of the due to the camera angle.

I suppose one way you can circumvent the camera ban at casinos, is having a hidden camera, maybe interesting to experiment with.

 

Hello sir! Thank you so much for your sacred information. I am really happy to have read your post. It is truly 1 excellent strategy studied very well. My question is.
It is advisable to play all. Hands? Example start new shoe and play all. Hands only P
AT THE END OF THE SHOE I WILL WIN OR LOSE. DEPENDS ON HOW MANY P OR B WILL COME OUT... OF COURSE.
OR Better to play with waiting? Without playing all hands.?
2 very important question... Have you ever lost 4 total budgets?

30-60-120-240?!?.

Have you ever managed to lose all 4?
Another question we are at budget 120 let's go back to earnings can we decide to go back to 1 budget 30 correct? Thanks for your information. All the best.

 

Hello cps10 - thank you for your contribution.

Cheers