Roulette Reading Randomness

"I'm only interested in the what is happening right now, what happened on the last bet, and the results of the next spin."

I'm only interested in the effectiveness and if the bet selection is working.

 

"you cunt go forth by looking back."

Yes but,
"woman who fly upside down in airplane have hairy crackup."

 

my deepl translator fails to find the context to roulette now

 

Hannah Reitsch flew JU 52 upsife down and flew the last Fieseler Storch out of embattled Berlin in April 45.

 

You must be kidding, cunt you look back then?

 

Look it up via Google .

 

Look up her dress to the hairy crack if you cunt look back. ; hairy crackup.... duh

 

What I'm trying to say is that the quality of "mr J" betting cannot be replaced by random guesses.
One has to understand that when you are betting more than 6 numbers then the longer you play the more possible becomes to end up loser, it might be good for short term, like any other kind of betting, thanks to luck.
My advise to you is not let lady luck fool you, you have to aim for an efficient and sustainable method which win overall in long term.
Such accomplishment cant b achieved by betting many numbers, whether it's in the form of an EC or 18 random numbers around the wheel, it has to be 6 or less numbers.
The table groups of 6, 4, 3 and 2 numbers are only just a few out of the myriads of possible combinations for 6 numbers or less, thus by selecting table groups, even with 6 or less numbers, we are limiting significantly our available options, but we are not limiting random which is a diva with 1000 faces, or should I say masks (?)
"TurboGenius" has already spoken that charting is not necessary when you are following the natural flow of the game.
Why we should follow the game's flow, you may wonder, because nobody knows what's coming up next, only the game knows!

 

She also was the first to fly an manned-version of the v-1 and she almost died as a result, hey hey.

 

her hairy crack was still up.

 

On that we agree. You can use a simple martingale on a single number and double it every 18 spins.

1 - 18 - 18 @ 1
19 - 36 - 18 @ 2
37 - 54 - 18 @ 4
55 - 72 - 18 @ 8
73 - 90 - 18 @ 16
91 - 108 - 18 @ 32

That's 108 spins in a row without finding a hot number. If you win before the double-down point then you win far more than the martingale usually does.

I can't believe that a good hot number hunter can go on that far without hitting a single repeat. So that alone makes Reading Randomness useful for hot number chasers. You go up in stages of EC's.

 

You have reminded me a system I have created back on BS.cc, by risking 36 chips to win 36 net (72 gross), you win with 1 number and you lose with 2 numbers, the remaining 34 numbers are push, you take back 36 chips.

You may select any 1 number to bet with and any 2 numbers to bet against, but if I were you I would have chosen 3 adjacent wheel pockets, my number in the middle being "sandwiched" from the right and left neighboring numbers.
What's the reasoning about it, simply if that 3 pockets wheel segment doesn't get any hits, I would not win, but neither lose.
If the specific sector get some hits then most likely there would be eventually for the central of those 3 numbers a hit, the adjacent right and left cannot get too many balls without any ball on the in-between number.

Of course such betting is for physical wheels, not RNGs, from my testing you would be 99.99% safe with 10 doubling ups, mind you, the doubling is based on 36 units instead of 1!

 

I just showed that if you are good at getting on the hottest single number you can grind away a small income from this marti. Example is if you hit the winner on spin 18 you make 18. If you hit the winner on spin 19 then you make 58. The worst you can do in steps is EC, even chance money. But you will likely hit most of your winners at something better. So it's doubling down chasing the losses but the payoffs are better. It's pure hottest number hunting. You lose the whole $1134 if you go the whole 108 spins without hitting a winner. It would be lame to sim this. You would need method to hunt hot numbers. The human brain is much more suited to do this. People should consider this. I mean they go coocoo for this type of stuff all the time.

 

Giz, I liked reading your random topic. But there’s only so much you can read. I’ll just deviate a little. The LOTT; comes from random. The 24 that hit once and the other 13 repeats. So, where do the repeats show? If someone was to collect thousands of 37 spins, they’d find the average position of when repeats occur in the 37 spins. Winkel with his 13-25-37; says by spin 13 could have 2 repeats.

I; myself got thousands of groups of 60 spins and broke them into blocks of 10 spins. Thus, I have an average for repeats of 1-3-5-7.

Now, let’s get back to random. Here are 2 games, 19 spins and 20 spins. The 19 spins produced 7 repeats. My known average is 1-3=4, So, here the repeats were fast. +3 for repeats.

The 20 spins produced 4 repeats. So, here repeats were average, 4; +0

So, these 2 graphs show random at work.

The wins of 100 units were from betting for either red or black. Can you train and bet every spin?


What do we actually see in a stream of 1/37 spin? You see singles; chops. Then you see doubles and these doubles can chop.

Now you talk of the weak side. I use zigzag and like you watch the stream. The zigzag might want me to bet red; but from watching the stream it might be giving doubles or chopping and the chop might give black; so, I might decide to go against the red.


look 28B then 2 red, 2 black, then 3 red a single, then 3 reds followed by 3 black.

Would you worry about chop in this stream?

Zigzag has in one of its streams 4 blacks followed by 2 reds and B-R-B. Those 6 blacks would be good for 4 spins and win again red #19.

So Giz; observation is good or is observation the benefit of training?

 

Giz

Were the chops problematic?
25 spins 6 repeats
#2 a quick Turbo win?

 

Giz
I must say it's easier than tracking repeats.

Is FTL?

 

Even Coco the gorilla knows that BRB should be considered as Be Right Back.

 

Bet - Red - Bollox
Do you get Blue

 

Hello,

I am sort of new here.
I have to wear my mask because its smells REALLY bad here.
Why do most people have to prove they have bigger balls and piss further than the others?

Several of you act like you are 12 years old.
Real men do not act like this. Period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have been interested in Roulette for 22 years. I have made decent money, in the 6 figures, playing bias wheels. I must confess that it is increasingly difficult to win like that now.

I always have been a ''maths'' kind of guy, ie each spin is independant and the odds...bla, bla, bla. You now where I am going with that.

Having said that, this thread intrigued me a little bit. I read about the first 26 pages, until I could not take the BS anymore.

I thought at first, the Giz may have a point here. Very difficult to say.

I think one way to test this would be to go to RX, and check something very simple over, say, 100k spins.
I think the Giz would agree that if an EC has 5 singles in a row that it would probably be a time to get a win.
This could possibly be coded.

In my very humble opinion, if the test is not positive, I cannot see how the rest of the situations could be.

Merry Christmas and stay safe!

Insider