Roulette [Part1]The Quest To Find The Holy Grail

My record is 19 EC wins in a row, and I'm crap at it, so...

 

Mines is 6
Small numbers

 

But mine were 27 in a row in 27 different sessions. I got the first bet right in 27 sessions and quit. Try that let me know how you do.

 

Yup i believe can have 19 consecutive win streak in 1 session.

Just like follow the last. Example 20 or more red.

But spike say 27 win streak in 27 different session. Thats another case

 

Dyna Blaster.

 

And one more thing.

I believe people can have 27 win streak session.

BUT 27 win streak session with just one bet in 1 session.

Thats mean 100 percent win rate betting decision.

 

Naw not gonna bother continuing this series. Shit is gonna fall on dear ears anyways. Gonna concentrate my energy elsewhere
Good Luck to y’all

 

You won't continue not because it's our fault, it's that you realize you don't know what the Holy Grail is and how can you discuss it if you don't know what it is.

 

Nope
I do not know what the Holy Grail is

 

Nobody does, that's the problem. It's a fantasy, it does not exist. So, like god, it can be anything you want it to be. Ask 5 gamblers what the Holy Grail is and you'll get five different answers.

 

True

 

bs.

& to add to that, you can't even quantify you overall u/spin ratio average; how'd you be able to define the ..

 

Sure I can. I make my goal and win every session I play. How many bets does it take? One bet, 3 bets, on a bad wheel five or six bets. What's the difference as long as I win every session. Okay, you say it's BS that nobody has the definition of Holy Grail. What's your definition, you must have one or you wouldn't say it's BS. Dollars to doughnuts you won't tell us what your definition is.

 

Nothing much to say .. abolish stop-loss. That's the one & only prerequisite of, fuck holly with you in duality caught minds simply, graal.

& win in spite of.

 

See, you tell me I can't define the Holy Grail so I asked you to and you don't know what it is either. Quit acting like you do.

 

I have an invert understanding of the Holy grail.

Most people look from the angle of winning always. I'm not impressed with nice looking winning charts.

I see the Holy grail as,

The risk to lose is low.

 

My simple criteria of holy grail.

Reduce the risk to lose. Make it zero risk, you have the Holy grail.

Which is harder,

Figure out how to win 1 unit,

Or how not to lose anything?

When you look at your chart, do you know your wins or loss better?

 

That's actually a good explanation of the Holy Grail, as much as possible reduce the risk to lose. I only make one unit and I never lose anything. Just tonight it took me five bets to win one unit. Lose win zero win win. Net profit one unit.

 

People are bragging about how much they win,

Or, bragging about how little they lose?

Are you impressed by a nice mountainous winning chart,

Or the small valley drawdown?

Do you find more value in 100% ROI,

Or 10% peak to valley drawdown?

 

I'm impressed by myself winning one unit and quitting because that's what I set out to do when I started all this 16 years ago. It dawned on me the very first week I was looking at roulette that the ultimate way to play is to have a goal and make that goal in one bet and quit. It gives your bankroll the least possible exposure to the bottomless bankroll of the casino which is your biggest danger. Overexposure. It gives variance no chance to whittle away at your bankroll.