Roulette Reading Randomness

That Stu Pitts talk Big bankroll. Bringing a proper bank roll is the requirement at all times .

 

that is so true, they are the ones who are predictable . not us. another reason why I dont like to spend too much time doing the same thing all the time. in thirty years of playing I have always done better playing short sessions or different systems at any one sitting. I always feel that my mental state and even phisical state is slowly getting "cocooned" into a worst player then when I am fresh and begin the day playing. one bad decision can take me to the cleaner, even more so playing online. that monkey can slowly creep on me if not careful.
I rather be a running duck if I can help it ,lol

 

Boy this is difficult to get your ideas understood around here.

I take the good results that Giz posted here at face value. Yes, I believe he has success with his method for the time being. And of course it would be great for everyone interested if it was not short lived.

Now how many of you have tested several systems, or methods, with very encouraging results at first? Results that made you think :''Gee! I think I might have stumbled into something really good here". Only to find out it was an illusion later when you continued testing or, worse, played it with real money?

Now, just be honest here. How many of you? Well pretty well all of you. I would bet my last dollar on this.

All I a was saying is there would be a way to tell if this method is good or not. Not with 100% certainty, either way. No one will ever achieve that. But with a very high degree of confidence. That is the the degree of confidence that Giz is showing, asking us to take his word for it.

I already showed a way to find out if the basis of is method is sound or not. Yes, I get it: it is situation related, and running a program will not look at each particular situation. I did not watch every single videos posted, but I am certain that in pretty well everyone of them Giz said something like: ''Look here. We have 5 singles on Red. I will bet that it continues''. So, according to him, this a better than 50-50 bet, right? For get the progressions involved. ( None of that will make a losing method a winning one.)

So running a tested over a very large sample will tell you if it is winning or not.

So, after 1002 pages or arguing for and against, no one is interested in knowing the truth? Amazing!

Or maybe, are we afraid of the truth?

You see, only good results over a very large period will prove a theory. (Like I said before to a very large degree of certainty, not 100%).
All you have to do is employ a very simple mathematical equation.

But no. We are interested in attacking (politely this time, thank you for that) the ''math guy''.
It is like if you believe that 1+1=2 you are some kind of freak!

Maths are used constantly in almost every post. But, in many of them, it is used when it fits the narative. When it does not, we just want to forget about it, or just say that there are some ''things'' that maths cannot explain.

I suppose it goes with the times we are in. The truth is manipulated to say the least. And some people will believe anything.

I do not know if we can ''Read Randomness''. As I said in first post, I was, and still is, intrigued by the concept. Maybe there really is something here. And I certainly wish everyone employing the best of success.

Regards,

Insider

 

I understand your point of view, I find it interesting tests to validate methods. But from what I understand about RR, I believe it is very subjective, the reading is also a little personal. I can see a pattern where you don't and vice versa.
I myself have been trying to apply the RR for 5 days. Aim at 2 units per day, and my stop is at 12 units.
I lost a maximum of 4 units, and I'm hitting the goal all these days. It's still a small sample, but I intend to continue and increase the value if it works.
In my opinion you can be a winner with RR, as long as you have a good read at roulette, be patient and disciplined.

 

[QUOTE="Claude Smith, post: 133428, member: 7916"

So running a tested over a very large sample will tell you if it is winning or not.

So, after 1002 pages or arguing for and against, no one is interested in knowing the truth? Amazing!

Or maybe, are we afraid of the truth?

[/QUOTE]

As Gizmo explains every time this comes up, writing the program for the test would be a nightmare. It would take forever just to prove something he already knows. If you were so concerned, you learn how it's done and you write the test so you can prove to yourself that it works. The only people I have to prove it to are in the casino and I prove it every time I play. Why would I care if you believe it or not, you don't give me money when I play, the casino does.

 

''Why would I care if you believe it or not, you don't give me money when I play, the casino does.''

That is very true!

I am not asking you or Giz to make the code. I wish I could but do not know the first thing about that. However coding something like ''bet red every time it comes up 5 times in a row is quite simple if you know how. So the code request is for anybody else reading this and having the same questions.

Like I said, afraid of the result?

Let me just say it once more: I am happy for you and anybody who makes money, whatever method you use. I know for a fact that is quite difficult on the long run, not ten or twenty visits at the casino. This is NOT a proof, I am afraid. I know, I know you don't give a damn what I think.

 

I have been doing this for 16 years why would I be afraid of anything. And that's a fact you could check out because I've been talking about it on gambling forums since 2006. So has Gizmo. Why would we be afraid of a stupid test when we prove it's true in a casino everyday. It's always struck me as bizarre that the people who have no idea how this works consider themselves the experts on it. And people who do it are considered non experts.

 

I just got 2 more units here and I'll post it as (picture attached). I observed a sequence with 5 equal repetitions, formed by 2 high numbers and 1 low number (circled in yellow). The streak broke with 13, what I did was follow the trend and I bet low and the roulette gods sent 1 low number. I got lucky.
Good Bets folks!

 

What I did in the days when I was making more than just one unit per session I would bet into a pattern or trend once, make a unit, and move on. I don't care if that trend or pattern kept going for seven more spins I was done with it. Because you don't know when it's going to end as you just found out. So I was happy with my one unit and waited for my next opportunity. It's very tempting to look at what's happening and think oh no I should have kept betting. You're far better off playing it safe. We have very selective memories and we tend to remember the times when it kept going and we forget all the times it ended almost immediately after we bet. Never let greed be your guide.

 

Exactly. I follow your advice and I really appreciate it. Greed does away with any profitable method.
Earned your unit in that sequence wait another one or come back tomorrow, simple as that.

 

''the people who have no idea how this works consider themselves the experts on it. And people who do it are considered non experts.''

What the friggin hell are you talking about? Did I ever say anything remotely close to that? All I am saying is if what you advocate is real, it will show in a test. That's it, that's all. But no. You have to get all defensive about it.

And this exactly what I was writing about taking what suits their narative. You use mathematics all the time when it suits your idea. If it does not, you call it stupid. Hum...

All I am doing is trying to help.

I certainly do not want to get into ''I can piss further than you'' kind of fight. I cannot know for sure, but I would bet that I have made an awful lot more than you have in gambling. So I take your ''stupid'' very lightly!

Insider

 

It does not have to be a computer simulation to validate this. It can be people that have been programmed. That is what is happening now and with this thread.

 

You asked if we were afraid of the results of a test. That is exactly the same as saying you know what we do doesn't work and we're afraid to find out the truth. When the exact opposite is true. We know that it works because we do it every day and we don't want to do a test because Gizmo doesn't want to waste his time writing one. He admits he might even not know how to write one because this is so complicated.

It's like back in the Dark Ages when they discovered how to make distilled spirits like whiskey and vodka. They had no idea how it worked or what the science behind it was. They only knew they liked the result and that was good enough for them. It's why they called the result 'spirits' because they thought the spirit world had something to do with making it. All I know is this works and it can never stop working because it's based on the roulette wheel resetting itself after every spin. And 37 or 38 numbers can only appear in certain configurations, they will never go off on some wild tangent where you won't know what's going on. If the wheel had 75 pockets you can never beat it. But it doesn't it has a paltry 37 or 38.

 

Good post.
It comes down to this
You can spend the time and effort to prove to yourself r.r works using the information provided, study, practice , think , practice, play in real casinoverse, fail succeed practice practice study

decision
A) it works and I love it and will recommend and help others to understand.
B) it doesn’t work and I try something else. I will help others to understand WHY it didn’t work for ME.

Or you can spend absolutely no time on the thread homework, expect to be spoon feed the results as to why you should be convinced it works ( even typing this shows how ridiculous the statement is lol) . Lol.

I cannot see any post by gizmo asking anyone to believe, nor does he try to convince anyone it works. He simply says here it is, this what I do, this works for me, it’s free to all that want to do the homework. I ,gizmo , am being a bit of a cunt but that’s my humour in making you work for your supper as I , gizmo, did all the hard yards myself, wore your shit harassment, but I , gizmo, prevailed.
I, gizmo, am giving you a free lunch but you have to clear the table ( homework) but enjoy.

Personally I understand you don’t want to do the work, join the 99% that come here for the free handout. But at the very least you should be able to do is get your facts straight, make your criticisms for sure from a factual standpoint of the threads content.

A lot of the directions given by gizmo are not only roulette applicable, there are a number of crossovers that it can be applied to. Too few can see past their own mental bias to benefit.

Personally I’m extremely happy for that as the casinoverse needs you. I need you , so thank you Claude. Thank you.

 

Actually I know exactly how to write one and validate the code and the results to be peer reviewed by programmers and mathematicians. Here is the deal. You fuckers are not getting off the hook and out out of your misery so easy. I have you on the hook and I know it. I'm a bastard over this. You get fucked because I want you to eat shit and suffer and die. What? That's not fair? Tough shit assholes. I control this. I see value in you finding out last that you were always full of shit.

Most people on the internet don't see why I'm so pathological about all this. Let's go all the way back to Snowman. I want his obnoxious ass stretched on a wall like a big game hunter's taxidermized trophy on my wall. He's mine. All you other wanabeeez can take second fiddle.

 

This is sort of true and funny to me at the same time. I spent years wanting to climb in Yosemite and to get better and better all along the way. I learned one thing from it all. If you are an assshole know-it-all then go ahead, climb the bastard, prove that you are right. Meanwhile I just kept to my own progress and kept my own council. This has served me well. The know-it-all math oriented are just a bunch of hot air.

 

Why dont witches wear underwear when flying on their broom?

For better grip.

Ken

 

Even if you wrote it and proved that it worked they still would not learn it because there's too much effort involved. And it's a lot of work when you actually play it. They want a system where you don't have to think before you bet. It's automatic, you just order drink after drink and keep winning money like you're a robot. These are greedy lazy gamblers who want something for nothing. They are nothing more than glorified lottery ticket buyers. Get rich by doing absolutely nothing to get there. When somebody asks me why aren't I rich from playing roulette, I totally dismiss them as clueless.

 

Now I’m going to lol this post , yes I’m risking spikes non reading ability to rear its head again. Or keven spacy to claim I’m getting a handful of gizmo scrotum sack, but I’ve had countless lol moments from the interpretation by various posters to the r.r thread. Mostly because they are so far off base and they just can’t see themselves flapping in the wind. I guess I’m just as cruel as you gizmo and I appreciate this thread from so many levels. Cheers

 

Is it better then the mouthful you usually get? (just punk'd punkcity)