1. Welcome to the #1 Gambling Community with the best minds across the entire gambling spectrum. REGISTER NOW!
  2. Have a gambling question?

    Post it here and our gambling experts will answer it!
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Discussions in this section are assumed to be EV- as they are outside of the Advantage Play section. For EV+ discussions, please visit the Advantage Play section.
    Dismiss Notice

Roulette Session tracking

Discussion in 'Roulette Forum' started by Gigi666, Feb 3, 2022.

  1. Gigi666

    Gigi666 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2020
    Likes:
    153
    Location:
    Europe
    This question is to all/few of those that are actually winning consistently.

    If your method requires tracking numbers or any other areas on the wheel or table layout and you are not using negative progression, do you think you could still win your session even if you switched tables mid way or take a break, especially if you are exploiting randomness?

    In the end if you are tracking your own group of numbers it should not matter where you start or stop, its still just a string of numbers.
     
  2. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    I win by knowing if I'm in or out of a win streak. So you must track things in order to see the conditions.

    Too many players think that just because they have arrived at the door that their system will work. They have no idea that you can test the waters at no value or at the minimum value for your bet selections while waiting for conditions to change. If you are magically motivated by math then the conditions will never change. That much is clear to them. That is why it is so funny to watch them grandstand on their soapboxes. Your system might be "always bet on black." It will flow in and out of win streaks and losing streaks with no tracking required. But you must be smart enough to know if chips are being taken away from you or added to you in the aggregate. This requires the ability to count, add, and subtract. This is a pretty good thing to know if you are claiming that math is the final word. Sometimes, but it seems like all the time, this is overlooked. Math does not matter when you need it to not matter. It's a great way to go through life. I just wish the IRS would be so reasonable. I would like to use magical math too.
     
  3. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    Yep, there is noting magical about them. You just need to know the conditions. Some people think that the dealer change causes a streak to change. I would check the new table before laying bigger bets. I've seen 4 tables sleep the same 12 numbers, all at the same time, and remain in that condition for over 4.5 hours. It's when I defined the condition the global effect. You can't make the win streak condition portable. If you wish it into being you will be disappointed. You must search to see the win streak condition.
     
  4. Naughty but nice

    Naughty but nice Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2019
    Likes:
    229
    Location:
    UK
    Yeah Giz, they'll have to learn; what did Herbie call it, oh yeah "Gambler's Intelligence"
     
  5. THR33 X THR33

    THR33 X THR33 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2022
    Likes:
    2
    Location:
    West Yorkshire, England
    On live tables I track the numbers from the beginning of my session but on such as RS I just continue with all the numbers I've logged so far from session to session. I'm presuming the numbers are just as random if I wait 30 seconds for the next spin or 24 hours so it seems pointless starting all over every time. :rolleyes:
     
  6. SPIKE

    SPIKE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Likes:
    865
    Location:
    midwest
    That really doesn't work. If the numbers from yesterday were playing your game that has nothing to do with what the numbers are doing today. Random is random, but for you to win the random outcomes have to be in your favor and you won't know that until you start writing today's numbers down, which have nothing to do with yesterday's numbers.
     
  7. Nathan Detroit

    Nathan Detroit Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Likes:
    2,080
    Dont take my word and neither have I ever tried this .


    A gentleman from way back when suggests . Let us assume you have bet B B R R R B B B and you lost every bet play the same series once more .



    Play at your own risk.
     

  8. Nathan Detroit

    Nathan Detroit Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Likes:
    2,080
    From the book Monte Carlo Anecdotes and systems by V. B Bethell . 1910
     
  9. SPIKE

    SPIKE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Likes:
    865
    Location:
    midwest
    A book which should be retitled Monte Carlo Worthless Anecdotes and Systems, or How Not to Win at Roulette.
     
  10. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    I know someone that would play it again with a Labby.

    You just pick an exact moment to start it. It can only fail at an exact moment, say 20 spins from now. The odds of that exact sequence starting up as a kill sequence in 20 spins is astronomically off the charts. Just don't use a Marti.
     
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2022
    Nathan Detroit likes this.
  11. Nathan Detroit

    Nathan Detroit Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Likes:
    2,080
    That info in that book is equal to the nonsense here on the forums .
     
  12. Nathan Detroit

    Nathan Detroit Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Likes:
    2,080
    In the Monte Carlo book it was exclusively martingale . But the Labby in your reference

    might be the better choice .
     
  13. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    I wouldn't do it. It's way too slow. I just like exact moment to fail sequences.
     
  14. SPIKE

    SPIKE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Likes:
    865
    Location:
    midwest
    I haven't looked at it in 10 years but as I remember it's mostly a book of progressions. There's not a single piece of advice on bet election it's just playing random numbers with a progression.
     

  15. SPIKE

    SPIKE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Likes:
    865
    Location:
    midwest
    All gambling forums are 90% nonsense but you have to go through all the nonsense to find out what works. Thomas Edison tried three thousand different filaments to find the one that worked. He had to work through all the nonsense to get to the point where he wanted to be. That's why he's famous for saying invention is 1% inspiration and ninety-nine percent perspiration. I have to agree because I worked my ass off to perfect my roulette method and I'm still working on it.
     
  16. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    Imagine picking an 8 step sequence. You then pick a random moment in the future to start that sequence. You can bet it to win or bet it to lose. If you bet it to lose you use the Labby and the only way it can lose is for it to be the exact sequence exactly at that moment and only at that moment.
     
  17. SPIKE

    SPIKE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Likes:
    865
    Location:
    midwest
    I stay away from progressions because all they are is magnifiers. They magnify your wins but they also magnify your losses. It's a great tool if you're winning but things can go bad really really fast using a progression so I totally avoid them. They also seem to give a false sense of security because you can win so much so fast and it's a false sense because you can lose it all just as fast. In fact you can lose it faster than you won it because the progression always gets deeper when you're losing.
     
  18. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    I don't use them.
     
  19. Nathan Detroit

    Nathan Detroit Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Likes:
    2,080
    That`s why it is 3 2 1. Can not bite you at the end .
     
    gizmotron likes this.
  20. SPIKE

    SPIKE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Likes:
    865
    Location:
    midwest
    All progressions are based on the premise that you can never do better than a 50% win rate. If you could do better than 50% why would you need a progression. The truth is if you can only do 50% you shouldn't be playing. This is why almost every internet Casino has a tutorial page explaining how to use progressions. They know it's going to make you lose even faster. The casino's attitude is exactly like the attitude of the guy playing three card Monte on a New York City street corner. He thinks if you're stupid enough to try and beat me at my own game I deserve to take all your money. That's exactly how the casino thinks.
     

Share This Page