1. Welcome to the #1 Gambling Community with the best minds across the entire gambling spectrum. REGISTER NOW!
  2. Have a gambling question?

    Post it here and our gambling experts will answer it!
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Discussions in this section are assumed to be EV- as they are outside of the Advantage Play section. For EV+ discussions, please visit the Advantage Play section.
    Dismiss Notice

Roulette Roulette betting questions from a newbie

Discussion in 'Roulette Forum' started by Wilx, Feb 11, 2022.

  1. Wilx

    Wilx New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2020
    Likes:
    0
    Location:
    Latvia
    I just recently discovered roulette, so I have few questions about the betting on it.


    1. What are the payouts for numbers 1 and 17 in Orphelins bet?


    2. What is the real profit you get from those payouts?


    3. What means total payout odds 6.2 to 1 in case with neighbours bet? It means I will win x6.2 from every $1 bet or something else?


    4. Why with Finales a Cheval 6/9 bet we don’t bet a Straight Up bet on 36?


    5. What are the real payouts for Finale en Plein 8 and Finale en Plein 6 bets? Are those 32:1 and 31:1?


    6. How much profit I can get from Finales a Cheval on 7,10 payout?


    7. What is the smallest number of chips I will need for the complete bet?


    8. I play a multiplier game where I get €135 once in 20 spins


    Every other spins brings me €7 losses


    I need €140 to hit a multiplier that will bring me €135


    What is the MINIMUM bankroll I'll need for a 200 spin session?


    9. Can someone explain me the progression behind this strategy (James Bond)?


    Spin 1: £20 wagered in total (as shown higher up)


    • £14 on 19 – 36. Win = £28 minus £20 wagered = win of £8
    • £5 on the Line bet. Win = £30 minus £20 wagered = win of £10
    • £1 on 0. Win = £36 minus £20 wagered = win of £16

    Spin 2: £49 wagered, plus the £20 wagered on Spin 1, resulting in a total of £69


    • £35 on 19 – 36. Win = £70 minus £69 wagered = win of £1
    • £12 on the Line bet. Win = £72 minus £69 wagered = win of £3
    • £2 on 0. Win = £72 minus £69 wagered = win of £3

    Spin 3: £162 wagered, plus £49 from Spin 2 and £20 from Spin 1, resulting in a total of £231


    • £116 on 19 – 36. Win = £232 minus £231 wagered = win of £1
    • £39 on Line bet. Win = £234 minus £231 wagered = win of £3
    • £7 on 0. Win = £252 minus £231 wagered = win of £21

    Why we wager £49 on Spin 2 and £162 on Spin 3?
     
  2. SPIKE

    SPIKE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Likes:
    865
    Location:
    midwest
    Here is my heartfelt advice. What it takes to win at roulette you probably don't have. So run as fast as you can in the other direction. You're welcome..
     
    mr j likes this.
  3. Nathan Detroit

    Nathan Detroit Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Likes:
    2,080
    You are getting way ahead of yourself with this entire game .
     
    mr j likes this.
  4. Nathan Detroit

    Nathan Detroit Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Likes:
    2,080
    P.S. Do not count on your knowledge of math . That`s the loser to avoid by all means .
     
  5. Sputnik

    Sputnik Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2014
    Likes:
    362
    My advice, give each bet a 50% likelihood to hit.
    You will lose, but you will have a lot more fun at the tables than chasing bets or betting beyond a 50% likelihood.

    I would recommend parachuting with flat stakes.
    If you don't know what parachuting is I can explain.

    Here are the attempts for each location.

    EC has one attempt
    Dozen has two attempts
    The line has four attempts
    The corner has six attempts
    The street has eight attempts
    Split has twelve attempts

    Skip singles, too expensive, twenty-five attempts.

    Cheers Sputnik The Gambler
     
    thereddiamanthe likes this.
  6. Nathan Detroit

    Nathan Detroit Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Likes:
    2,080
    Will anyone listen ? Heck no. They are all smarter Knowitalls.
     
  7. Proofreaders2000

    Proofreaders2000 Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Likes:
    143
    Hello Wilx. Roulette is like Chess. Knowing the
    basics is one thing. Knowing when to do what is another.

    Best advice atm? Get a seasoned
    study partner to work with you step-by-step.

    After a week or two of intense study (with advice from
    your mentor) decide if you want to continue Roulette.
     
    mr j likes this.

  8. mr j

    mr j Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2015
    Likes:
    1,809
    Occupation:
    self employed
    Location:
    Milwaukee, WIS
    My short, non-helpful answer..... TRIAL & ERROR. If you start now, by 2034 you may be on to something fabulous.

    Ken
     
    Last edited: Feb 12, 2022
    SPIKE likes this.
  9. SPIKE

    SPIKE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Likes:
    865
    Location:
    midwest
    I am more optimistic, I am saying by 2027. At the earliest.
     
  10. Nathan Detroit

    Nathan Detroit Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Likes:
    2,080
    On the single 0 wheel I would chose the 17 numbers of the voisins . Nine units will cover them .


    Play at your own risk.
     
  11. SPIKE

    SPIKE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Likes:
    865
    Location:
    midwest
    So you are the guy that plays that, I knew there had to be somebody out there.
     
  12. Nathan Detroit

    Nathan Detroit Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Likes:
    2,080
    If time and location permitting why not 4 or 9 number voisins ?
     
    mr j likes this.
  13. Proofreaders2000

    Proofreaders2000 Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Likes:
    143
    If you start now, by 2034 you may be on to something fabulous.-Ken

    That's accurate. (It took me 14 years :) )

    I'm thinking a committed gambling group, like four or five people
    intensely training newbies for a year could shorten that time.

    Gizmotron imo has it right with his gambling school.
     
    gizmotron, mr j and SPIKE like this.
  14. Nathan Detroit

    Nathan Detroit Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Likes:
    2,080
    Are you serious ? They want EC and the martingale .Does not require nych teaching.


    Casinos love it and BS system scammers as well.
     
    mr j likes this.

  15. Proofreaders2000

    Proofreaders2000 Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Likes:
    143
    Ahem.

    This is why imo it takes so long to learn, especially with
    small morsels of knowledge here and there on forums.
     
    Last edited: Feb 13, 2022
  16. thereddiamanthe

    thereddiamanthe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2019
    Likes:
    276
    Occupation:
    apicem rapax DNME
    Location:
    Empfire
    What multiplier? Explain.

    Contact me & I'll offer you some material to speed up the mind up .. through the introduction & grasping of the advanced concepts, no charge no hidden fees. Details in my profile section.
     
  17. SPIKE

    SPIKE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Likes:
    865
    Location:
    midwest
    That's it in a nutshell. If they can't learn to do it in one afternoon they want nothing to do with it. Gamblers are impatient and itchy, not introspective and studious. They want the thrill of the risk, not homework.
     
    mr j likes this.
  18. mr j

    mr j Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2015
    Likes:
    1,809
    Occupation:
    self employed
    Location:
    Milwaukee, WIS
    100000000000000000% correct.

    Ken
     
    SPIKE likes this.
  19. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    Thanks for what you said.

    Before I wrote the RR thread I personally trained a person starting out with very little experience in two months, meeting online in an email discussion back and forth for two hours each day. He understood everything in the first month and went on to prove a 2 to 1 win to loss ratio in take from hundreds of sessions. He proved he had the skills needed. So any person that has reached a consistent 2 to 1 ratio in take home can teach others face to face in a very short time. Not years but just a couple of months. And that way there is no lying going on. You see the improvement and the end results. You teach and they learn or they fail to do the work. But you would know. People gain their own expertise and experience. They relate to things that were not taught to them. They see deeper into the data streams. People just get better at this. Part of learning this is going beyond what was taught and making connections with other things not seen before. The pallet gets more colors. The data shows more possibilities to find working sequences. You just get better at winning. You take way less risks. You know that the cheerleader will take down her dress and ask for it. Randomness is a mistress that gives up her secrets. Each time you go into a casino you know that a sequence that will get you what you want will happen. You just have to wait for it to be working. No casino on earth can defend against a large throng of talented players just waiting for sequences of opportunity to be in working continuation. That's the threat to the entire gambling world. And we all know that the math oriented experts will never see this coming.
     
    mr j likes this.
  20. SPIKE

    SPIKE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Likes:
    865
    Location:
    midwest
    What is the name of our cat that's not right
    My daughter is a college math professor. Every semester she has about 30 new students in her algebra class. After the first week there are about 15 left. After the second week there are usually less than 10 left. So she started out with 30 and for the rest of the semester she'll be teaching 8 or 9. That's how it would work with teaching this. You might start out with 10 students, and after the first week you might have three or four left. Maybe. And at the end you might have a couple left. Now remember, her students must complete this class before they graduate and they still dropped out even when they have incentive to keep going. Your students will have no incentive. People just don't want to do hard work, even if it has rewards. The reason her students drop out is because they didn't pay attention in high school in algebra class so they're totally unprepared for college-level algebra. Likewise your students will be totally unprepared for anything like this.
    .
     
    Keyser Soze likes this.

Share This Page