Roulette Ask Me Anything About Betting the EC's (Even Chances)

Bbbwwaaahhhhhhhhhh, the limey, the gizmo and the spike, the three biggest bulls-shitters in the joint, hey hey.

 

Bbbwwaaahhhhhhhhhh, the limey, the gizmo and the spike, the three biggest bulls-shitters in the joint, hey hey.

 

Even bull shipping is an art which requires perfection .

 

Sooo…you also agree that math is useless in roulette?!
Amen!!!

Welcome to the club

 

Comprehension is not a strong point with this one.

 

Which you exhibit a lack of in every post. You want to try and convince me I'm not doing what I've been doing for years, winning at roulette. Since they legalized gambling in my state, I do it every day, play and win. I never have a losing session. Yet you want to try and talk me into your limited way of thinking that I could not possibly be doing this. That's why I always say math is a religion to those that practice it. And if you are not in that religion, if you go against the religions rules, you are a heretic. That's fine, I would rather be a winning heretic then a losing cult member.

 

I'm not trying to convince you of anything. If you have a winning way then that's fantastic.

But what is shared on here is not sufficient for anyone to repeat. It all comes down to your unique "educated guess".

Have you heard me say the game is -EV yet so you can't ever win? No. Don't try and use the woke left strategy of broad classification by putting people in boxes so you can make them the enemy.

 

Have you even read your own posts?

"If you can't describe your method on a page for everyone to understand and then back it up with supporting math then you're actually full of bullshit."

"You have no value to provide anyone, let's face it you're an abject failure."

"But math can then be used to validate those ideas, used as an analytical tool to ensure we are not decieving ourselves by thinking we have something significant when it's just an illusion and doesn't actually hold water"


"Math can help either validate or refute the wishful thinking"

You're not trying to convince us of anything? Give me a break. I'm validated every time the casino pays me for winning a bet, they validate me everyday. Why would I possibly need anything else. Convincing a math person that this works would accomplish what exactly, nothing productive I can think of. Who cares what you think, you don't pay me. You probably think you're the first math person to confront me and Gizmo you're actually the umpteenth times the umpteenth. We are out there actually doing it while you're wasting all your time figuring out why it can't be done. Ironic and comical at the same time.

 

The only thing you're doing is jacking your jaw all day on these forums. Quit lying to yourself and the rest of these fools.

 

I could care less if you win or lose but when it's all handwaving nonsense you're not helping anyone but funneling to gizmo business.

The fact you can't even multiply out some probabilities says the whole thing is a pile of garbage.

 

You misunderstand, I am asking YOU to convince any rational person who doesn't believe in reading tea leaves and "the vibe of it" when making a betting decision.

You can't convince anyone who uses critical thinking and Jizzatron can't either. You two are the gambling high priests of gambling forums, "just believe and you shall receive". Where is the substance? (rhetorical question)..

You both say, pay no attention to math, and roulette is not a math game. You are the biggest ass clowns on here for saying that and should be laughed out of town.

Only fools can actually ignore the math, any professional player pays a lot of attention to the math, amatures like you two bit ass clowns make money funneling suckers into Jizzatron "reading randomness" scheme.

I'll be quite happy if my challenging your nonsense fucks up your marketing funnel.

 

From your opening post:

Basic math questions can't be answered so fraud and douchbaggery is proven.

Exactly, it's mysticism, reading tea leaves and tarot cards applied to roulette.

 

It's his third eye, precognition, tea leaves and tarot cards. It's the vibe of it and can't be explainedz it's beyond math or reason.

If you sign up the Jizzatron and Spike program they can "help" anyone develop their third eye and six sense into reading randomness, it's only a modest fee to start today.

 

No doubt, without question says the suplicating acolyte of the Jizzatron and SPIKE marketing team.

 

Here comes the sucker story, shady sales plan 101, you to can save time and money that poor Jizzatron went through for a small fee, why not get started today.

For anyone who is impressed with the math sounding bait and switch about the binomial distribution its nothing complicated at all, but beyond the Fizzatron understanding.

I can save you buying a book on binomal distributions (it would be a very short book). Here is an example of all possible outcomes of two spins ignoring zeros for red and black:

RR
RB
BR
BB

So how many rows have exactly 1 red? (2) so probability is 2 out of 4 (2/4 = 1/2). How many have one or more reds? (3) so probabilty is 3 out of 4 (3/4). How many have two blacks? (1) so probabilty 1 out of 4 (1/4).

That's all there is to grasp his "math sounding speil", but Jizzatron then says there is some magic voodoo beyond the math and suggests mysticism is the answer trying to sucker the unwary into his program.

Buyer beware.

 

I get it now, you're a math troll. Feel free to carry on this conversation without me..

 

And beating roulette. Don't forget that. I'm willing to answer reasonable questions but nobody does that because you don't really care to know the truth. All you want to do is be right about your position.

 

Right there, math is an unreasonable question with this gypsy mystic.

 

Right. Problem is, you wouldn't be able to tell us this without using your computer, which relies on quantum theory, which in turn relies on probability theory. And you wouldn't be making any money from casinos because they too wouldn't exist without probability theory. And that's only two of its many applications. So much for "junk" science.

 

Ok, here's a reasonable question: If roulette outcomes are independent, which means that past outcomes can't predict future outcomes, how is it possible to win 80% of your bets just by looking at the last 12 spins?