Roulette Ask Me Anything About Betting the EC's (Even Chances)

What a pathetic and juvenile display of Ad hominem. a defence mechanism for when you can not refute an argument; to paste a wall of text claiming I'm full of crap.

nobody in this thread has discussed the topic of La Partage to this extent; I posted evidence of a couple percentage values, a fraction and that triggers your math anxiety. you're incapable of counter-arguing my position on EC with La Partage, that confirms you actually know nothing about advantage betting.

 

Math sucks. You suck at explaining it. That adds up.

 

You believe that the house has the advantage. It's a sitting duck in a shooting gallery for me. You will never learn why. Go away and polish your spandex.

 

you fail to accept arithmetic yet you'll delude yourself with silly analogies to games of skill & calculations to describe your chances/ probability of winning in roulette.. Tell me you're American without telling me..

 

You are on ignore

 

Those math cats are like flies on pile of manure .They dont get the message .

 

Even if we drop the Math your English Writing and Grammar is poor. Put me on ignore for your own sake.

 

The only people I've ever seen get math anxiety are math people. You do not need a single lesson in math to beat roulette because you cannot use math to beat roulette. You need math to build a motor car but you need absolutely no math at all to drive one. It's a fact the casinos love math people because they're the biggest losers.

 

*continues to bash mathematics*

By that logic all virtual gamblers should throw out their simulators & charts; you cant use math to beat roulette.

Even Chance refers to equal fractions that are likely to succeed or fail. Math is not limited to expressing logic, shape, quantity & you're arguing for my case with engineering. An outcome in a game is defined by mathematical parameters.
It's ironic you proclaim statements about probability with 100% conviction. I'm waiting for somebody to refute EC with La Partage is the most optimal bet in this game.

 

Do you honestly hear yourself.

 

All EC are 100 % luck and 0 % strategy. Live with that . Pat results are dead meat;


All one can say " Oh ,that how it went."

 

Luck is an interchangeable term that means Chance or Probability; the branch of mathematics concerning how likely an event is to happen. Have you wandered through life not realising this?

 

Start your own thread

 

Why am I disrupting the echo chamber in here?

 

Do yourself a favour and at least read previous threads this forum, that topic has been discussed, everyone is aware of it . Ratchet back your delusional self importance a notch , you look more like the fool than your avatar. You want to be the big judgemental hypocrite and out yourself in your Emperor New Clothes , go start your own thread .
You will get very few interested , you know it , that’s why you came to this thread all fire and brimstone, your just another blow through and to use your own quote “ have you wandered through life not realising this”

 

Your just too scared to start a thread, lol

 

you would reccomend I go read through the archives of this dead forum because you also cannot refute my claim; EC with La Partage is the most optimal bet in roulette? I've been asking for a coherent rebuttal.

None of you in here actually want smoke. I've dismantled each one of your metaphors as knowing nothing at all about Roulette. Everyone is aware you're mentally a child nervously laughing at his own comments, you feel intimated by a Simspons meme.

 

The optimal bet in roulette is to never bet on it. Quit wasting your time. If your nonsense really worked, you wouldn't bother telling anyone and keep the secret to yourself.

 

Agreed.

 

bold to assume I would show & tell my secret to the internet, let alone problem gamblers.