Roulette Ask The Croupier

Although the La Partage is being offered in AC nobody made a big issue about it .

It is there but not at the instant when you need it .

 

I don't concern myself with La Partage. There's no reason for me to. Why should Spike?

 

Doesn't matter if I did no casinos offer it outside of Atlantic City and who the hell goes to Atlantic City unless you absolutely have to and I've never had to. This guy lives in the UK and he thinks the rest of the world is like his part of the world. It's not. Not even close.

 

https://www.gamblingforums.com/threads/ask-me-anything-about-betting-the-ecs.22969/

How do you defend someone who claims to know everything there is to know about betting on the ECs but has never played La Partage?

 

It depends on the player who bets randomly. That is every player's bet. Whenever you place a bet, the timing is a random event in the distribution frequency of bets.

Your explanation of the house edge is mostly vague; that you dismiss the 5.26% fixed edge because you can read randomness. In the limited parameters of your experience, we've established that you don't know anything about La Partage,
so your interpretation of how to challenge the house edge on EC is misguided.

Regardless of location, you choose to still play American Roulette. That is already flawed logic.

 

Incorrect.

The site automatically moderates links, pushing a space before the domain ending (*.cc) --
remove it once pasted in the browser address bar.

https://www.rouletteforum .cc/index.php?topic=28401.75

 

This is what the house edge is calculated on, people making random bets on random outcomes.

That is because my edge so dwarfs the house edge that it makes the house edge completely irrelevant. What is so difficult to understand about this.

Why would I know anything or care about something that I've never seen offered in a casino. Why would I give it one minute of thought. I will never see it offered and even if I did who cares, it's a fart in the wind.

This is because Indian casinos where I live do not offer single zero roulette. If they did I would play it. Even in Las Vegas there are very few single zero roulette tables. In the ones that I was lucky enough to find they were always so crowded and the minimum bet was so high I couldn't play it. Online that's all I play is single 0 if it is available. Your knowledge about the gambling world is amazingly narrow. You talk like you think you're an expert but you come across as a newbie. Your lack of knowledge and understanding is mind-boggling.[/QUOTE][/QUOTE]

 

Imagine that .. perhaps La Partage is so great to save the Marti .. more dealer heads know more

 

LOL

 

Beware of the Dwarf .

 

EB aka Spike is desperate to be regarded as a man who has done the impossible - beaten an unbeatable game (not including visual prediction whereby a few highly skilled players may actually get an edge)


but EB - aka Spike doesn't do this

it was just impossible for him to accept that he would be regarded as an ordinary person

so he concocted this fantastical fantasy that he is an extraordinary person with extraordinary capabilities

and where but on a gambling forum would there actually be people who buy into this______????________not many places


.

 

Like I keep saying over and over the only people on the planet that need to know for sure that what I do is legitimate is the casino and they affirm that every day when they pay me. I convince them conclusively every day that I beat roulette. What other entity could I possibly care about it. Certainly not you, you mean less to me than what my cat leaves in the cat box. LOL

 

T^h e age of Albert F Wendell no doubt. Full of bull.

 

Explain your answer.
How is losing 2.7% less than losing 1.35%? How is La Partage "incorrect" with the math?

Need to remove "%20" from the URL.
This extract from the intro you reccomended to read. Is as applicable to playing EU/FR roulette tables 1:1 even-money bets with La Partage.

To recap;
we only control the amount of chips placed & how the placement is distributed, with the recovery & protrusion rate, we directly determine the volatility & exposition; to
retain the drawdowns recoverable (at any point = game in control). we have to traverse the out of favour variance, creating the least debt possible.

This is considered satire as some of you believe American Roulette is better than EU/FR roulette.

 

I'm going to be real blunt. You don't get it. Your system is a random bet on a random outcome.

..............

Delusions of Grandeur
Go bet your system on a triple zero wheel?
No matter the variant of live roulette, the house always has the edge over the player. You've at least heard of math?

thank you for sharing that you don't know anything about halving the house edge.

You're a talking contradiction, I'm glad the internet can spectate the charlatan for who he is.

 

Spoken by someone who has no idea what my system or method is. You are judging me because of your own shortcomings. You erroneously think because you don't have a winning method that nobody can have one. You need to go and read the entire reading random thread buy Gizmo. He lays it all out and I guarantee you will not understand it.

 

I know your system has to pay tax on it.
I'm judging you on the basis that you play American Roulette. Always has been.

I physically stopped reading after;

The icing on the Gizmoron's reading randomness is that the charts completely exclude zero or double zero from the game. You are both clowns.

 

In an American Casino that's all they offer. Duh. So what, an extra zero makes little difference if you have a large enough edge. I play online now and they mostly have single 0 European wheels. Again it doesn't make that much difference. My edge is so much greater than the casinos that the zeros are minor inconveniences.

The only opinion that matters is that of the casino, they are the only ones I have to convince. Your opinion only means something to you, it means less than nothing to me.

 

If you play with edge, then you are AP and know based on what you have edge and how big it is...I never read that you wrote about this, maybe missed...

But I read, that you sometimes see situations for play, sometimes - not. But roulette is not Blackjack, when sometimes are left many "good" cards , sometimes not...

Roulette is quite stable game, of course every spin is different, but if to play based on that - play on EC is not logical, because then positive and negative bet changes by every pocket, nobody can say 31 or 18 have greater chances to fall, but are some who can say which half of wheel in actual spin have greater chances - 0 side , or 00 side for example...

 

Bs alone won't constitute consistent winning, neither will La Partage alone, nor both together.
Although they surely add to the mix .. more is required .. see 'irreducible complexity'.
.

Its about cost-effectiveness: betting the absolute minimum possible of what an individual game is at any point asking to resolve in nominal positive, with the lowest unit spread, highest possible coverage, thus the highest probability.

At some point, at a certain exposition amount, playing EC positions only is not the most cost-effective option anymore (usually at about 10x the amount the bet gives you , hindering the profit/spin ratio



Another two extracts:
The most important point, the merging & distillation of the three passages above, is the least generated exposition, resulting in the most recoverable drawdowns, requiring the shortest intervals of variance (turning) in favor.

The more recoverable the drawdowns, the quicker recovery .. once variance turns into favor,
the more recoverable drawdowns require shorter intervals of variance returning in our favor.

satire it is .. them.