Roulette Ask Me Anything About Betting the EC's (Even Chances)

This is supposed to look impressive. But what it actually revels is a person that would rather remain ignorant and imply to others that she is superior in knowledge. It's such a blind spot that it can only survive in a reinforcement of the drone of a fake information delivery system.

 

Wrong again. Just how long are you going to keep relying on your own assumptions and sophistry?

 

Yelling does not make your assumption the truth. You can speculate, just like the moving averages in the stock market, that won't predict the future either. No prediction, yet the math people that forget your notion of fairness have nicer houses because they don't need a magical capability for prediction either. Some math people are smarter than others. Some just need to impress people that have no idea if they will care what they think. You should right a book about how fair randomness is.

 

What you guys are not looking at is the coincidence of a figure formation that has no capacity to foretell the future still having the ability to signify a condition of working temporaraly to your advantage. It does this all day long as I have clearly demonstrated. There are coincidental phases of good and bad. It's good to target those temporary good conditions and to exploit them. Your problem is that you are unskilled at exploiting coincidence. You have almost no capacity to see multiple phases of working coincidence. So, like Spike said, if you can't do it then nobody can. LOL

 

Where is that rule written in stone? Who is claiming a mathematical edge? Do you have a disagreement with "Swing Traders" in the stock market that use historical past swings, moving averages with support & resistance, past data, to exploit the figure formations found in carrot & stick stock market charts?

 

You have already had it explained to you. There might be too much bone between your ears. Here is a coincidence. Why are math oriented people that frequent gambling forums so sure that randomness can only be beaten by a capacity to predict the future? And here is a prediction too. They will never see past their idea that the world looks best through their rosy colored glasses.

 

To you this is ad hominem: "wait until it is working." That is exactly what traders in the stock market do. And the majority of them put their money where they think it will do the best. Meanwhile the trudge to open the eyes of others is like pulling a baby's teeth and telling him to calm down. I say let the unwashed remain in their ignorance. So you math zealots can go bother other people. You are superior and you know it. There are more delusional people to impress. You have succeeded here. The casinos are safe again. Spandex is on sale at Target.

 

Here is the kicker. Luck travels together in packets of coincidence at times. It takes a skilled mind to see these coincidences. I target luck that is temporaraly in my favor. Like you just said, I also take a small number of wins from luck. Greed stops too soon because luck travels together in smaller bursts typically.

 

Gizmo,

Firstly, if the connections only exist in your mind (which is what I said) then obviously they don't exist in reality, so there is no actual connection between the spins. It's a fact that spins are independent, and Spike agrees! In order for his claimed 80% win rate (that's the mathematical edge he's claiming) to be true there must be a real connection between spins. Any idiot can see connections where none exist, but in that case whatever action I take based on those assumed connections will have no effect on reality.

Sales of ice cream correlate positively with shark attacks; as ice-cream sales increase, so do shark attacks. Should we therefore ban ice-cream?

Do I really have to spell this out?



And you can't compare the random game of roulette with stocks. Swing traders can make money because prices aren't entirely random but are influence by events and by the behaviour of other traders.

 

He's not claiming a mathematical edge. He's claiming an 80% win rate result from guessing at the right moments. There is a difference and I hope that you can see it.

 

I can, you can't. Moving averages are not much different than stocks compared to bet results in a graph.

 

To prove it with math there probably does, but to make an educated guess, no, there doesn't have to be a real connection. You are making up a game in your head and playing it with the actual outcomes. As you watch the outcomes unfold they go in and out of your game. When the outcomes are playing your game in your head you can make successful educated guesses. When it's not playing your game you don't bet. Why is this so hard to understand. A lot of it has to do with logic, coincidence, and common sense. Mostly it has to do with experience in observing outcomes.

 

Before the spin, you do not know which game it plays ... opposite you know the result of the next spin and can play much better, than on EC ...

 

If it's just luck then there is no advantage to to be had by looking at the past results, phases or patterns. But instead the reading randomess cult say they get an advantage from it.

They just don't want to admit that they are saying there is a connection between spins.

This is the sophistry we have come to expect from the reading randomness cult leader and their acolytes.

So you claim you get an advantage by looking at the past data, "coincidences" and "figure formation", with no capacity to fortell the future but giving a temporary advantage fortelling the future.

The mind boggles.

Getting an indication of what might come or some indication of a bias or potential outcome is fortelling the future better than a random guess. It has to be a real feature that exists in reality to actually profit from it, not just an imaginary concept in your mind.

You like to call it an "educated guess" but that is just obfuscation for predicting the future from the masters of sophistry indoctrinated into the cult of reading randomess.

An "advantage" is another word for having an "edge".

You are both claiming an advantage with your method of looking at the past results, phases patterns, cloud formations, tea leaves, tarrot cards whatever.

You don't want to call your advantage "an edge" but the sophistry needs to be exposed, an advantage is an edge, and anyone who claims a better win rate than random is claiming to have an edge.

 

Just admit it. You guys are losers.

 

I finally figured out how to take screenshots of a game I played and download it here. Following is a Roulette and Baccarat game along with stats.

 

I won 64 units in both games

 

Just finished a game of Craps. 64 unit win. Didn't go over the 5th step of the Marty.

 

That's the thing about the Martingale. People are always crowing about how much money they make when it's working. The problem is the losses, and there's always going to be losses, can and will be absolutely devastating. I keep saying this over and over but back-to-back losses are usually what kills it for people. And you never know when it's coming but you do know that the longer you play that it will come. I would say avoid roulette because of the zeros but there is really no other place to use it. The commission in baccarat will kill you and there's too much waiting in craps.

 

Here's a photo of the last page my strategy record keeping. 265 games played. 8,419 units won. 42,099 divided by 5.00 base unit