Roulette Ask Me Anything About Betting the EC's (Even Chances)

I'm just pointing out that in real time in a real casino it would take you years to get 8000 units ahead. I got lucky, I played around with a Martingale years and years ago in practice for about a month and I thought I had the world by the tail. When I say I got lucky what I mean is I busted out playing for real money in the very first session that I played. That stopped me cold in my tracks because that's not supposed to happen. I learned the same lesson over and over to never think I have anything worthwhile until I play it for real money. It's very hard to explain or understand but what you do under real circumstances is never the same as what you do in practice. Part of it is when you're there betting real money you are not the same person that you are sitting at your kitchen table. It's like the guy who sounds like an opera singer in the shower, put him in front of a real audience and it's a different story. It's what separates the professionals from the wannabes, the ability to perform under real circumstances.

 

"Knowing when not to bet is as big a tool in your arsenal as having a good bet selection."

The success of professional poker and blackjack players depends on knowing when not to bet. In poker you keep track of the odds and bet accordingly. Blackjack card counters make minimum bets until the deck is in their favor. Learning when not to bet in roulette has the same effect, you save your bankroll for when the game is in your favor.

 

I've been in poker for 10 years, and the good fold is an art.
The times I broke the bank, I bet when I shouldn't, going out of strategy looking to recover some loss.
Keeping discipline and learning to follow the trend of the game is the way to victory!

 

Just be aware that Roulette EC is NOT Poler.


Re- tool your thinking .

 

typo Poker

 

Best of luck with the EC.

 

"Just be aware that Roulette EC is NOT Poker."-ND

Agreed. You can't intimidate a Roulette wheel.

 

At no point did I compare poker with roulette, the comment I made was about discipline when playing, it's about wanting to recover from lose and not about the aspects of the games that are totally different.

 

?

 

At no point did I compare poker with roulette, the comment I made was about discipline when playing, it's about
wanting to recover from lose and not about the aspects of the games that are totally different.-Rond1nell1

My mistake. Please accept my apology.

 

Alright friend!
And sorry for the bad English, I use a translator.

 

That's what the math oriented don't get. I base my guesses on trends and patterns that have no ability to be correct. They just go into phases of working and into phases of not working. The reason I use them is because I can see them. I see a streak of blacks or reds. I see perfect sets of singles. So if you check them against them also working you have bet selections that are also in phase with winning. There is nothing magical about it. Math oriented players are clueless to watching for guessing that is in a win state phase. They just see odds. They also assume that odds have magical powers and that there can't be win streak phases. From that alone they conjure up the fantasies of prediction.

 

Facts!

 

Trends and patterns don’t exist in the minds of a mathhead when it comes to roulette.

 

Math itself prevents them to consider an open mind .


Stuck in the mud . No way out .

 

The following is a picture of the last page of my win/loss betting strategy journal. The Martingale failed 6 times pretty close to back to back as a lot of you predicted would happen. Game 269 lost 31 units, Game 270 lost 4 units, Game 271 lost 54 units, Game 272 lost 32 units, Game 274 lost 27 units, Game 275 lost 48 units. A total loss of 196 units. My starting Bankroll is 381 units. If I lose that amount, game over. However, the total loss is only a tad over 1/2 of my Bankroll which is no problem at all. Games 276 and 277 recouped the total loss and put me ahead of my last highest win by 16 units. Recently I changed to a 6 step Marty because I noticed I rarely need a 7th step. I still have a win goal of 64 units per session which means I only need to win 1 session to completely recoup a 6 step failure of 64 units if I have not won a single unit.

 

Good work!
Keep studying and keep making money.

 

I totally agree. If patterns and trends did not exist, there would be no way I could possibly be ahead as much as I am with the strategy I am using. It is completely based on patterns and trends; especially patterns that continually form.

 

Actually I am not making any money with my strategy. I am just testing it on RNG's for the fun of it to see how long it holds up.