Roulette Ask The Croupier

He is probably googling around and trying to find some stats so he can pretend he is not a fraud.

Refusal to answer direct questions in a forthright manner exposes his sham and is something of a pattern, he never answered a single one I put to him.

 

Ahem.. no answer to that one.

 

To my knowledge dealers in Germany Wiesbaden and Bad Himburg Casino are not on salary but are

relying on tips .

 

It repulses me to give any more attention to decrepit old men who wasted their lives losing at roulette.

 

it would be terrible if giving tips becomes mandatory

 

entire life is an illusion anyway

 

6probability9,
Again, how much do individual dealers
make in roulette game tips on an average night in your casino?

 

No tipping of dealers is allowed here in Australia, but dealers also get paid proper wages.

I think of tipping dealers as paying extra house edge because the house is not paying a fair wage to the dealers so the gambler has to cough up more.

 

He is trying to count to 1, give him a break.

 

100 % tosser. level 1 = (36÷67)⁰ said the guy who can't count how many times he's lost.

 

About a PS5.

 

House edge is payed ALSO on a winning spin.
Thereof your + is an intentional obfuscating error.

That's it you capitulated.

 

Psst...in the UK dealers don't receive tips. Tipping isn't allowed.

 

You're so boring and ignorant.
You clearly don't know shit outside your limited knowledge of casinos in america.

 

Also stfu.

Fm. You are paid 1:1 on Even Chances
The house edge on ECs is literally the 0 pocket.

I really cba to interact with humans that demonstrate below par intelligence.

 

For Example:


This dingo fecal matter.

You don't "pay" the expected value per individual bet. The expected value aka house edge is the mathematical advantage the casino has over you as you win-lose over time. a percentage return to the house if you were to repeat betting over time.

#-$26.54

 

In fact let's ridicule the counting error,
On your very first level.

You claim 100% is the Pr before losing.
Implying you discount 1 out 37 Pr you can win?

Who can't count.

Let's say your "series" applies to the Pr of losing events. Therefore if 100% is the Pr before losing.
The math you applied (36÷37)^(1-1) = (36÷37)⁰

N⁰ = you haven't bet; specifically you haven't lost nor won. You could say N⁰ = you playing fantasy columns on excel spreadsheet.
You can't comprehend that multiplaction is repeated addition.

 

You can remove the vulnerable from gambling.

But you can't remove gambling from the vulnerable.

There's a fm minor in here.

 

Do I hear echoes out of a pit hole ..