Roulette Ask Me Anything About Betting the EC's (Even Chances)

Name the professional you are calling a nobody that uses the Martingale to some extent that achieves a degree of success. It's obvious you have a real fear of me because you cannot, and do not answer any of my questions. You always come back with a one-line tiff that has nothing to do with what I asked you. Like below

Play at your own tisk.

It's better to sin than to lose

Playing to win 1 ynit is the smart nove

Always go to a casimo on a happy day

Not wise to take credut cards to casimo

 

Twisting words another new forum parlor game ?

 

Other than what you use for testing, would you say that random.org is a second best choice?

I am having an interesting conversation with someone at random.org. I asked them if they could come up with a better system for testing Roulette. The response back was others have asked the same quetion in the past. He asked what I suggessted and it was no more than having the numbers come up with the appropriate black or red color and allowing for it to be set up for American Roulette with a 0 and 00. I gues as it is now you can set it up 0 through 37 and use the number 37 as the other zero. He said they do have an interest in making it more friendly to Roulette testing. I believe every other selection they offer will accomplish most everyone's needs.

 

That was not your point at all. You said there is no degree of randomness either something is random or it isn't. Now you're completely contradicting that. Make up your mind, there are degrees of randomness or there are not. There definitely are.

 

But you do not make your bets in the long term you make your bets in the extreme short-term and there are differences in the extreme short-term between RNG random and true random. There are differences in true random, random.com is not the same as roulette random in the extreme short-term.

 

Contradicting yourself again. Now you're just copying and pasting what I say.

 

NO! The only thing you should ever test with in roulette is actual outcomes from a real wheel. If you spend $30 you can buy Roulette Xtreme and download as many actuals as you want from German casinos that have millions and millions of them online. Then you can join the rest of us in serious testing instead of the bull crap you're doing now with RNG's,

 

Okay wise guy, I wasn't going to mention this but you forced my hand. I have lots of experience playing for real money in Vegas casino. I lived in California at the time and it was real easy to get there. This was my wife's favorite thing to do since our early 20's. That's why I have an infacutation with betting strategies. I never lost a session playing Blackjack or anything else. I used the strategies I developedd and I think the reason for their success is because I would only use them for a short period and move on to a different one. And then from my mid 30's I played professional music as a drummer. Most of our gigs were the Nevada casinos. I probably have a lot more experience in casinos playing for real money than you do. And I have probably won more maoney then you ever have in all your career because I always played for a lot more than a 1 unit win and run. I never did however, play the game of tidly winks for peanuts.

 

Just like I said, with compulsive gamblers it's all about who's got the bigger dick. My dick is bigger than yours, look how much I bet. Whatever, schoolyard crap, grow up. I'm there to beat the game and make money not prove to everybody else that I'm a real man.

 

You cherry-picked what I posted as you usually do. You accused me of having no experience, why didn't you comment on that? I said I had lots of experience. More so then most on this forum. I was not a cumpolsive gambler either, I played for fun just to see how my strategies did. And they did well. As a matter of fact, I am not a gambler at all. You are, you risk money every day, that's a compulsive gambler by any definition. Back then, the only way I could test a strategy was to use actual cards or dice. I was not into Roulette untill I joined this forum to look into it. So far i have only found a few people that offer any real advice. You are not one of them. You have had nothing offer that furthers ones knowledge about gambling. The only thing that you do offer is argueing with those who know ions more than you do. I listen to them, but your posts, I just laugh and shine them on. I'll tell you one thing for sure, I have enough knowledge to know what you claim is total bs. Go join a circus, you have lots of experience being a circus clown.

 

According to me;
relying on luck is relying on a credit system .. sometimes the bonus tilted in your favor, will be rebalancingly taken away .. & the latter could be when you need it the most -- so fuck luck.

 

Beyong the threads intended context, but since mentioned gonna ask here

From Wikipedia link:



Would the formula for this https://stackoverflow.com/questions...ntense-points-in-the-fluctuation-of-frequency be found herein, the equiprobable law (keywords: the sum of energy, density)

 

In all fairness;, with a 80% hitrate -- irregardless if played +one unit/session, or over many session -- base unit positive progression woyld do wonders ..

 

In all truthfulness, a person with a 80% hit-rate could be a muti-millionaire. However, there is no such person here on this forum or anywhere else.

 

Seneca hit the nail on the head 0

o

 

And RMD kicked the ballout of the park. G

Kick at your own risk.

BSR

 

SPIKE is genuine but with the rest of some posters I have my doubts .



I go along if you suffer from the Bora Bora syndrome .


With that you are a happy pers om .

 

Explain the extreme short-term exactly what is it.

 

You don't know shit from Shinola, you're the guy who thinks he's going to break the casino with the Martingale. LOL

 

Again, you show your naivete. Every rookie compulsive gambler asks that question, how come you're not rich then. I don't explain it anymore, I gave up.