Roulette Ask Me Anything About Betting the EC's (Even Chances)

In my testing phase of the Martingale I thought I had the world by the balls, I thought I was unbeatable. I remember even strutting into the casino feeling sorry for them. Luckily for me I lost my very first sequence, five step Marty and I lost all five. I was heartbroken, but I didn't realize how lucky I was because it could have been much worse.

 

Your strategy was lousy, that's why.

 

Do you actually think that is the only research I have done on rng's vs Live play? You're the chump because you have not produced any statistical proof to prove otherwise. Just like I said earlier, I know who the guys are that are full of bs because they never answer any of my questions with proof, just their f- - - ing oppinions. You have been all talk from the very beginning, you have offered not one iota of proof of anything you say. And don't give me your bs answer that you don't have to prove anything to anybody only the casinos. You are a party politician who claims he only has to prove he's right to the other politicians. I have your number as I am sure many others do also. One unit a day, ha, ha. LOL and I mean that literally.

 

So is yours you just don't know it yet. We're all big time winners in the testing phase. Something happens when you go into a casino and I really can't explain it. I've had this discussion many times with people and they agree. Part of it is you make mistakes when you play in real life and those mistakes you can't shrug off. It's not possible to have the same level of concentration playing for real money as you have during practice. But there is something else going on to. You'll see. Maybe, if you ever go.

 

No such thing, we are perfectly rational and sane. It's little to do with math but the irationality of your hand waving.

Given anyone who anchors to a scientific method get tarred with being a zombie I'm happy to wear that badge.

Maybe you go see a witch doctor when you get sick but most people prefer to see a specialist, who has spent a lifetime studing the science and putting their knowledge into practice, not someone who spews bable about wind, earth and fire making non specific "educated guesses".

Same with enginering roads bridges and skyscrapers. Would you rather someone who reads the coffee grounds, crises the sticks, chants for a few hours and makes an "educated guess" or someone who applies math and science to engineering a functional and safe structure?

The science used to put satellites in space, man on the moon, deliver high speed internet, and information technology with nanoscale engineering was only possible with science and math.

Do you really think all those things above are less complex than 37 pockets on a roulette wheel?

Your disdain for rational thinking is a personal choice you have made to be patently ignorant.

To see you celebrating this ignorance shows you have nothing to offer.

 

It should be no part of your research yet you posted it here like it's really important which shows me you have no idea what you're doing. And I don't make one unit per day I make one unit per session. I play more than one session a day, there are 13 casinos in my state that have live roulette wheels.

 

You do realize did it all eccentric crazy people think they're the ones that are rational and sane and everybody else is off their rocker.

 

Says someone who doesn't even know how many bets he makes In a session.

In fact you don't even know how many sessions you played and yet you claim 1 unit per session. Surely your win to date divided by your unit size is the number of sessions.

I know the math.. you have to add up and you hate the math.

 

I posted that before, recently. I'm right on the first bet 80% of the time and if I'm wrong most of the time I win it by the third bet and if that goes wrong 99.9% of the time I'll be one unit ahead after the 5th bet and the session is over. LWLWW

 

Having the ability to add is your definition of insanity.

That makes me crazy hey.

 

My strategy is simple and playing live wouldn't change that. I may not be like you, I know how to focus under pressure; especially when it comes to money. Quit telling me what happened with your experinces, we are nothing alike. As I said before, I have played in real casinos for real money many times, piece of cake. I don't get flustered in the least like you evidentally do. When you first tried the Martingale, your strategy was obviously nothing like mine. In other words, it sucked. Not very well thought out. If you actually used a 5 step Marty as you say you did, tell me what your strategy was. What was your bankroll? What was your win/loss goal per session? But I'll bet your answer is that it goes to far back and you don't remember. Maybe I am a lot smarter than you because I have kept record of all my strategies to make sure I wouldn't try the same thing again. By the way, I am still waiting for you to provide me with statistical proof that the outcomes of rng's are different than live play. So far your claim that they do not provide the same results is bogus. Like your 80% win rate.

 

Simple or not you're going to make mistakes because everybody makes mistakes no matter how bulletproof they think they are. And mistakes with a Martingale are deadly. You could save yourself all this whining and hand-wringing if you just go play it, that will answer all your questions. Play online at Bovada, I do everyday along with my state casinos. They have a $5 minimum in roulette. If you lose a seven-step Marty it's only just over $600, big deal. You can make that back in what, 130 or so Marty sequences? How long would that take, seven or eight hours? Piece of cake.

 

I don't make mistakes when playing my strategy. I asked you to quit comparing me to you. You do not answered my questions, instead you spin to comments on other matters that have nothing to do with what I asked. Come on now, be honest, your are a retired politician from a failed state. I will apply my strategy to actual money play when I feel its the right time. It is an 'educated guess' when I should do that.

 

Here's some math for you that is absolutely correct and I defy anyone to prove me wrong. Your 1st bet only has a 50/50 chance. Your 2nd bet only has a 50/50 chance. Your 3rd bet only has a 50/50 chance and so on. Actually It is less than 50/50. If you believe otherwise, you are insane. You believe you can see into the future. If your hit rate is as good as you just gave an example of: LWLWW. if you used the Martingale progression you would have won 3 units instead of 1. Plus your win rate allows you to use the Martingale more successfully than anyone in the past. Why don't you use it? Are you affraid that your strategy has the potential to lose 6 or more times in a row?

 

No you won't, I can almost guarantee it. The Martingale is the oldest losing strategy in the world, even a hundred years ago, more than 100 years ago, it was called a fraud and a sham. Nobody in their right mind risks scores of units to win one unit. It's insanity. You constantly make fun of my one unit win and quit. But look at it, it's beautiful. You can never get underwater, there's no stress involved at all, you win your unit and you're done. You are only playing for one unit also, one unit at a time. I never have to bet more than one unit to win one unit. You on the other hand sometimes have to bet scores of units to win one unit. That's nuts, that's insane, that's having a gambling death wish.

 

The math is correct if you're betting randomly against random outcomes. I am not betting randomly, far from it. I have developed a method of play that when the outcomes are playing one of my games my hit rate is 80%. In other words I win on the first bet 80% of the time if the outcomes are doing what I want them to do. This does not happen all the time, obviously. Like I said I've gone a couple days on multiple online wheels and not seen a single bet. But that doesn't happen very often most of the time I see bets every time I play. It's very much like hunting squirrels. I'm in the woods seeing a lot of animals but I don't shoot at any of them I only shoot at the squirrels. Therefore my hit rate is very high because I'm not firing randomly at everything I see like most dumbass gamblers out there.

 

____________


Spike wants you to believe he can beat roulette - even though he can't prove it

he should be believed because this is a gambling forum - and everybody knows that claims made on gambling forums are just about always true

he doesn't need to prove anything - just take him at his word - it's good as gold

he's obviously an extraordinary person with extraordinary abilities

he shouldn't be asked to prove anything - like everybody else in the world is when they make an outrageous claim

it's the Math Boyz who are the bad guys - they can prove what they state but so what - that doesn't make them right
.



.


.

 

But they cannot prove that roulette cannot be beat. If they could they would have done it long ago. All they can do is piss and moan and cry that you're not beating it, but they can't prove it.

 

PKB... You can't prove that he can't beat it. This is so funny. All you do is wait for a winning streak and then you take from it. The casinos, and the mathZombies, want you to make the same bet on every spin. If you don't they will cancel you. This thread is like fly paper to the Marti and Zombie world shakers. Ever notice that they can't learn?

 

You are betting randomly against random out comes. Its not possible anyother way. You constantly say you see bets. That means you are using the outcomes of what happened in the past to determine what will happen in the future. That only works in science and math. However, there is no past happenings in roulette. The next bet you make regardless of what happended previously, you still only have a 50/50 chance of getting it right. To say you have an 80% chance of getting it right is impossible. I understand that because I believe the math. My strategy however, takes something else into account which is based on math. So far you have only been lucky and that's good. Just as many people who have said the Martingale is doomed to failure, as many or more have said that basing your next bet on what has happened in the past is also doomed to failure. You'll see. Just like you keep telling me.