Roulette Ask Me Anything About Betting the EC's (Even Chances)

No he is not Bright Eyes. I'm not either. PunkCity is not. A bunch of others are not also. It's you that is playing randomly. But don't see it. It would make you be the naked king in his new invisible outfit if you were to see this. So you are stuck trying to be the blind leading the blind.

 

Another assumption and a lie if you project it on others. Nobody has the power to determine what will happen next. So I ask a simple question. Do you think more losing streaks will turn into win streaks if you just start betting them or do you think that more win streaks will continue to win if you just start betting them? And most important in this question, can there be times when a streak continues to work in swarms of similar and timely streaks as opposed to just occurring in phases of chaos? Can you know these conditions because you are skilled at seeing it?

You can't because your eyes are shut. And for some reason you hang on to a claim of prediction because it works as a crutch for you to understand your limited logic.

 

Says the blind Marti expert. You have to laugh at all this. Just take it to a casino. Some day they will erector a statue of you as well as put you in the gambler's hall of fame.

 

Dave, 64 units profit or a bust ends the session, right? Do you have a record of how many sessions busted?

 

He's not the only one. The world is no longer flat. It's so simple that any third grader can do this. BTW, I have never seen a pit boss that did not see the win streaks in his section, never. I guess they are extraordinary people too.

 

Just remember this moment. It has never been proven that confirmation bias has been the basis for properly conducted scientific discovery other than 97% of all politically invested climate scientists that think that Man Caused Global Warming will eventually lead to the oceans rising. It's easy if you don't ask the scientists that don't believe the baloney. But there is this thing that happens on earth. After an ice age the ice melts. I know this because of Yosemite Valley. But, if you can lie to people and sucker them then you can have a nice jet to fly around in and promote your doom and gloom. Suckers are the very best opportunity on planet earth. Now you are woke.

 

Gizmo, when did you get your PhD in climatology?

 

So a martingale would have got the job done faster and more efficiently on the second bet. Job done, but you floundered around for another 3 bets.

By your own logic you will need 2 wins to recover from a loss and make a profit, if you get 2 losses now you need 3 wins, 4 losses now you need 5 wins.

You need to be right many more times than a fixed 5 step martingale.

A 5 step martingale is 31 units. I will add it up for you as we know you fear the math 1+2+4+8+16=31

You claim and 80% hit rate on a 50/50 outcome but everything you do is inefficient and fails to capitalise on the alleged advantage you claim.

The martingale is the only mathematically proven strategy to provide a guaranteed win.

The chance of at least one bet winning approaches one (100%) as the number of bets approaches infinity. That is the math.

The practical limit is that neither the casino nor the gambler have unlimited funds. The house sets bet limits precisely to protect itself and stop players using the tactic, because of how effective it can be.

Now you may think I am recommending the martingale but I am not suggesting it for mere gamblers and the unwashed masses. But for esteemed experts in the "educated guess" with a 80% probability of winning on a 50/50 bet should without reservation because the odds are so overwhelmingly stacked in your favour. You only need a 5 step martingale because as you say you never ever get more than 5 bets down. That's 31 peanuts and not a nut more.

 

You pick the only field which actually lacks credible science. It's full of people like you waving hands about, not experts like at NASA who have to send probes to other planets and have real working and accurate climate models.

The fact that you conflate the political shenanigans with science to try and make a point to the detriment of science is actually just showing how corrupt politicians are to leverage or twist and hand wave using whatever tool works pseudo science included.

 

Yes to your first question. Unfortunately I have not kept record of how many session have busted. But basically, I win 5 sessions to one bust. I have played 300 sessions. The answer is in there somewhere.

 

Some people can walk and chew gum at the same time. Some can count some cannot.

 

Based on you previous numbers I worked out that you were within 3 standard deviations, and very much on the positive side of the variance.

So it's certainly a good amount of luck to get the results you have.

 

It's all guess work my boy for you and everyone else. You cannot KNOW when a streak will happen, you can only guess. And I would bet that you have missed thinking a streak was going to happen and it didn't, many times. I'll tell you what, I have record of thousands of roulette outcomes. Tell me how many outcomes you need and I will post them. Then you tell me what your next bet would be and I will post that outcome. This presents no more of a challenge than actual play.

 

We could even use a cryptographic content commitment as proof to eliminate any claims that the results have been manipulated.

But sadly that's math again and these clowns don't trust math, hand waving yes, math no.

 

I have to agree with the luck statement and that's hard to account for. If Spike wins one unit a day or so, that doesn't take much luck, but it does take a little to a certain degree.

 

The only sure way to see a win streak is after it happens.

 

When did you get yours in Cranial Proctology? Because you are full of it. The basis for all progressive opportunism comes from the discovery of a French Philosopher that suggested that you could change the world if you lie to it successfully. This became the foundational tactic implemented by 60's radicals and successfully exacted by design by 1985 in the education systems. Today there is no such thing as objective truth. Everything is deemed subjective. Now all this was foretold in the 60's book "The Velvet Monkey Wrench" and documented to have been successfully implemented in the book "Telling The Truth" published around 1990. If you are a liar and out to get funded by government grant money in the field of selling hot air to suckers then an official PHD is a great way to go. But now we all see what liars progressives are. We see it's all about power, global governance, and the money that makes liberal elitisms the new 1%. You are nothing more than a person that likes to be lied to. New York City was supposed to be 5ft deep in ocean-rise more than 20 years ago, according to the brain trust that you think is validated. So don't see this. It will hurt what's left of that space between your ears.

 

Classic mathZombie speak.

You can know when it is happening. You don't have to know when it will start. But you can't because you need to have a basis for your opinion.

 

Yes, I totally agree that we are constantly being lied to by those who tell us that they can predict an outcome based on the past. Telling us that it is not really a EC 50/50 chance but now it is 80/20. Only a moron would believe that.

 

You are right, I do not have a basis for an opinion. But I do have a basis for the facts.