Roulette Ask Me Anything About Betting the EC's (Even Chances)

Not a common acronym, everyone knows this as Follow Last Decision, FLD.

Other well known terms are:
OLD - Opposite Last Decision
DBL - Decision Before Last

 

I never think about that because I have no interest in those games. I can see where math could help you a great deal. But all math does for roulette is tell you what you will win if you bet randomly against random outcomes. The mathboyz will tell you that roulette is unbeatable when they really have no idea. Because they cannot read random outcomes they think nobody can. They wrongly assume that you will always be betting randomly against random outcomes when this is the farthest thing from the truth. If you study the outcomes long enough they will start to make sense to you if you have a mind that works that way. But I've said before there are people who can't see patterns even if you point them out to them they don't see it. I saw it immediately the very first time I looked at a roulette tote board and I was winning playing in my head and I thought wow, everybody must do this because it's so easy. That was in 2004 and I never looked back.

 

A woman turned nuts and was admitted to a facility of the insane after trying to have the last word at ECHO Lake .


A warning to those cats and their last word .

 

Spike the janitor arguing with the Space-X engineers:

ENGINEER: Washing hands in bathroom.
SPIKE: Enters with bucket and mop.
ENGINEER: Waiting patiently for mop man to get out of the way.
SPIKE: "In a hurry?"
ENGINEER: "Yes, big test launch of the Starship today."
SPIKE: "Why test, it's all random!"
ENGINEER: "Okay, hmm, what would you suggest?"
SPIKE: "Well you are all fools, and should only use my edumacted guessing to get payloads in orbit."
ENGINEER: "Why would that work? What logic and rules for launch do you use?"
SPIKE: "Rules? There are no rules! It's all random!"
ENGINEER: "How can that work?"
SPIKE: "It works 80% of the time. I noticed over years working here if stalls are low on toilet paper it's a good time to launch."
ENGINEER: Amused says, "Yeah launch days are quite busy, all hands on deck".​

 

Having the last word problem ?


Glenside Health Services m Adelaide Australia .

 

A nice bedtime story for you..

Btw. Adelaide is nowhere near me. How is it there at Glenside?

 

E pur .. despite all of that .. he can't produce a formula for the max density of the events.

When geniuses fail, they call us.

 

Sure .. sure ..

 

LOL. Sounds about right

 

@David Gregory I know that I am a bastard, dickhead, .. whatever ..;
though but fair.

Put on hold what you feel & think about me &, I encourage you, to rather focus on my work that speaks for itself.(posts & links above). Again it should not take much of your time, while the payout is huge ..

.

"How could I decrease the amount of capped Marti's? Can I !?"

Sure.

 

Use [±1,top] model .. but instead of '+1' parameter, execute your Marti sequence.

So, on no-hit play 1u/spin .. exposition increasing by -1,-1,-1,-1 ... & on hit;
run Marti.

.

You're using 5-step Marti, don't you?

This way your usual number of +1 games will be reduced ..
but sure as hell you'll (be able) to surpass plenty of streak sizes of 6x, 7x, 8x, 9x, 10x, etc.

Overall, when both above are balanced out, should improve the total balance sheet in your favor,
simply due to reducing the number of those -31s or -63s.

.

That's the initial idea. You can refine it further.


The best progressions are the combination of neg, flat & positive;
multi-level & multidimensional.

 

All of which are a ridiculous waste of time but the casino will love you for it.

 

He can't stand it that I beat roulette and he can't so he has to constantly pretend that I don't so he can live with it. Trust me, he believes that I beat roulette or he would not have hung around in this conversation so long. If I think somebody is a crackpot and a liar I don't give them two seconds of my time and neither does he. He thinks if he keeps it up I'll finally prove to him that I do. He doesn't know me.

 

Due to that, improved efficiency, you might even be able to afford another Marti step,
bringing the overall performance even higher -- iron it out ..

 

For me it is the NOW and that is LDS. Not interested in that past spin gimmick .

 

Actually, I have not drawn any conclusion about you and I don't think anything negative about you. What made you feel otherwise? I viewed a few of your posts and was wondering if you practice what you preach in real money play.

 

Just talking from experience.

The reassurance you seek you secure/ensure in improving your game in the best way possible.
My business is my business, my work & advice are available.

Take your time.

 

Like Median Joe we are not buying anything you say. That is your baseless claim that we "want your secrets".

To the contrary we both think your position is illogical and your claims are delusional.

 

Generally speaking +1 march type betting can get a long way vs a martingale.

Their flaw is alternating WLWL patterns, as you lose big then win small then lose big. In general bets steadily ratchet up through the whipsawing of mixed results and the session bankroll balance becomes increasingly volatile due to larger bets being made as the session continues. Oscars grind and variations on the theme like the [±1,top] approach all suffer during phases you don't get clustered wins.

Most of these +1 type progressions need a 30+% win rate to succeed but will dig big holes during prolonged phases where you don't get those back to back wins.

 

And yet you spend all this time conversing with somebody who you say you don't believe. Talk about illogical. You know I'm doing something but you just can't figure out how it could work and it drives you nuts. There are no rules. It's just like hunting of which I used to do a lot of. There are rules in hunting concerning you have to have a license and you're only allowed to shoot certain animals. But the hunting itself has no rules. You cannot go into the woods with a set of rules that you're going to follow and have any success. Hunting is all about experience and observation. Just like what I do in roulette.