Roulette Ask Me Anything About Betting the EC's (Even Chances)

Ok, you are only here and constantly win. But why do you think that others must believe in that? Regards forums - you here are very active - the natural question is why? What is your aim? And why do you not write in other forums if here you are so active?

 

Reading random hey. It's fucking random! On one hand you say it's random and results are independent (which I agree with) and then you say you can observe and predict the outcomes. You call it a guess but the definition of prediction is any opinion whatsoever on a future event. How you resolve those two positions requires one to be comfortable with self delusion.

 

All EC are games of Luck . Not games of strategy.


Games of strategy are Poker , Pai Gow Poker , Black Jack.

 

Guessing is not a strategy and based on past results a fallacy.

 

Frank Barstow`s principle of diminishing probabilities makes sense .

 

He was able to get permission from the nursing home administration to have this site white listed, hence why he is active here and doesn't get out much.

 

My system is a thousand times better than yours. and I have absolute proof.

 

I think betting half the wheel is the best roulette strategy there is.. But, you have to have the propper betting progression. That would be my approach if playing in a real B&M casino. However, when playing on a rng roulette simulator, you cannot bet half the wheel because there is no wheel. There is no physical layout in an rng as there is on a real wheel. On a real wheel, a physical ball rolls around one half the wheel then the other half etc., then drops into one of those halves. This physical action is not duplicated in the least on an rng. I would love a strategy betting half the wheel but unfortunately I only have access to rng simulators. What would be the best strategy and progression for betting half wheel?

 

With the martingale je got Frank Barstow on his side .

 

Spike would vehemently disagree.

He is a magician and able to predict outcomes 80% of the time.

Spike would say "I can guess outcomes 80% of the time. I don't predict outcomes."

.. because substitution of the words "educated guess" for "predict" is the Spike wizards secret ingredient to let you beat random.

The wheel concedes defeat if you "guess" and place a bet based on that opinion about the next outcome.

If you were to instead place a bet based an opinion about a future event (the definition of a prediction) you cannot beat random, because the wheel knows that a "prediction" is different to a "spike guess".

 

Well, in regards to my EC strategy, I want it known to everybody that I GUESS what the next outcome is going to be. It isn't even an EDUCATED GUESS. It is a guess BASED ON THE FACT that only 3 types of patterns WILL form. So, I simply keep track of the 3 patterns and write them down in the order they last appeared. Before I place my first bet, I skip the outcomes until I see that all 3 patterns have formed. Depending on what the latest pattern looks like, I start my betting to repeat the pattern that is the furthest back, pattern 3. If I miss, my next bet will be to repeat the pattern that is second furthest back, pattern 2. If I miss, I bet to repeat the pattern last produced, pattern 1. I just made 3 bets GUESSING what pattern WILL repeat. Using a 6-step Marty progression, I have 3 more guesses to get it right. Most of the time I don't have to bet past the 4th step. I cannot tell you how many times I have laughed to myself winning bet after bet wishing others who do not believe in pattern betting were watching this happening.

I have played 327 sessions and have won 10,632 units. Below is a picture of my win/loss documetation. The win is shown in dollars. 53,164.00. I use a 5.00 base unit when I play. You can believe me or not. I have nothing to gain in making this up.

 

That's what it is with you math people, you have it stuck in your tiny little brains that random is the big bad Boogeyman, nobody can figure it out, nobody can read it because it's scary old man random. In roulette there's only 37 or 38 numbers that can come up so it's not very daunting to learn how to read it. If it was 75 numbers I couldn't do it. And you can reduce that number to 24 if you want to make it even easier. Math people are scared to death of random and because I don't have a math background I didn't know I was supposed to be terrified of it so I just learned how to read it. After a while it just becomes second nature you don't even think about it.

 

I literally could not care less if absolutely nobody believes it because I'm here for myself. When I post on a gambling for him it keeps me constantly thinking about what I'm doing. Just yesterday I figured out an even chance that I didn't even know existed and that's because posting here keeps my mind working. Why would I care what you believe, who the hell are you to me. We are all only here for ourselves and if you believe differently you're kidding yourself. I'm a selfish self-centered son of a bitch but so is everybody else here, only I'll admit it and they won't.

 

On paper in testing it's probably ten thousand times better. Go play it every day for a month in the casino and report back. But you'll never do that you prefer to live in Fantasyland. You think none of us have ever been exactly where you are right now, looking at test results thinking we have the Holy Grail? Think again.

 

It's not and progressions are only Band-Aids that cover-up poor bet selection. A progression just delays the eventual loss.

 

How would you predict a random outcome, it's impossible. All you can do is make a guess based on observation and experience. If somebody tells you they can predict random outcomes they're lying. They're guessing just like everybody else.

 

The fatal flaw here is you're acting like random outcomes follow some kind of rules and they don't. Your rules for betting are far too rigid for something as fluid and changing as the random outcomes in roulette. In order to beat the game you have to learn how to go with the flow and that involves having no rules at all. When the flow of the outcomes are playing one of your games you can bet and when it's not you ignore it.

 

You do not know that is true you are only repeating things you heard somebody else say and they didn't know what they were talking about.

 

So people in Australia in their early 70s are in nursing homes? Where I live many people in their early 70's still have full-time jobs. I just read about a guy who's 82 and still drives a semi full time. I'm building a two-stall garage this summer all by myself. The only thing I won't do is put the roof on. Australia must be a pathetic place if people in their early 70's are all in nursing homes, what an awful place to live. Must be the heat, bad food, and bad genes.

 

My betting strategy is thousands of times better than yours and it always will be. I have absolute proof. Everybody tests their strategy before they play for real. And most do not even test it as long as I have with the results I have. So there. Why don't you at least post your win/loss results as I have. This will not give away your strategy one bit. It will show you're on the up and up. I guarantee you one thing for sure, you will never be believed by anybody on this forum if you do not present some proof of your claims. Doesn't the online casinos keep record of your winnings? Let us see a screenshot of that. You say I am afraid to play for real, you don't know that for sure. But what we all know for sure is you are afraid to present any proof to us because it doesn't look anything like you claim. So far, you have been all talk and no show.