Roulette Ask Me Anything About Betting the EC's (Even Chances)

So you reject the math of Conways leading numbers?

You say that waiting time for all patterns of the same length is the same?

You just like to wave your reading randomness dick in the air.

Address the math and stop behaving like a gimp.

 

A skill in mental masturbation and dellusion.

If you are as smart and earnest as you claim you could easily provide simple proofs of your claims.

But you cannot. Just drivel and hand waving nonsense.

But truth is not your "game", you seek to funnel people into a sham with yourself appointed as a guru in the art of hand waving. For a nominal fee you will even provide tuition in the dark arts of "reading randomess".

We all know what you are doing.

 

Spike is merely a supplicant and accolyte of your cult of reading randomess.

What is his finders fee?

 

Giz. you are beginning to sound as mentally disturbed as Spike is. And yes, I am a Greek scholar.

 

Gizzmatron is a Reading Randomess scholar, and like the Greeks from antiquity the student Spike sleeps with his master. By all accounts Spike is quite an adept rusty trombonist and is now just as confused as the master.

 

And it delights us no end that you feel this way. Because we have taken so much grief over the years from you math pinheads that we love the fact that we've beaten roulette and you can't figure out how we do it even though we're telling you how we do it. You asked why do we flaunt it, and for myself I can say I am here because I learn things when I talk about this. Just this week I discovered a take on an even chance bet that I totally missed all these years and it was right in front of me. But that's how it is with all discoveries, it's just sitting there waiting to be discovered.

 

That's hilarious when you consider that I'm the one who coined the term 'reading random' way back on Gamblers Glen about 15 years ago. Gizmo expanded on it and turned it into a thing.

 

Meaning what, you like to watch naked men wrestle like the ancient Greeks used to do? I'm afraid that's not considered scholarship, it's called homosexuality.

 

LOL, yet another subject you know nothing about that you think you're an expert on. Stupid is as stupid does..

 

Actually TwoUp, there are 8 patterns only if you consider 3 outcomes at a time. A continuous run of outcomes only produces 3 patterns, no more.
The following is the 8 patterns above put together as a continuous run based on actual play.
S=Streak, D=Double, A= Alternating
XXXXXOXOXXOOOXXOXOOOXOOO
S A D S D A S A S
That is exactly the way I keep track of patterns when I play a sesion. From the pattern tracking I would notice that the Streaks are most predominate. I would also notice that an Alternating pattern usually follows after a Streak. So therefore, after an X follows the last streak of O's, I would bet O. OOOX O. Just a hunch, but it usually works most of the time..
DG

 

If you have a good car then what - you never will drive it, because somebody can steal?

 

I had the abbreviations directly under each pattern, but when I posted it, it moved them all to the extreme left.

 

Yes with one exception - in the picture - I'm younger......

 

Yeah, I am pretty sure TwoUp knows nothing about the Spike sleeping with his master. Care to enlighten us?

 

It's a cool picture, kind of like a pencil drawing. We can never share a picture of ourselves taken today and showing it the next day withou saying I was younger when that picture was taken.

 

Oh, I get it. It's all becoming real clear now. I know what your real problem is. You are having a mental break-down because the GUYS on this thread are not showing you the love you so desperately desire from them.

 

lol, more absurdity. Why are you worried that someone will reverse engineer your "method" when is there is no pattern or structure to your betting and it has no rules? And what about the casino which records your every bet from the moment you login?

 

It's as gay as fuck! So is yours, by the way. What's with all the rusty trombone players around here?

Has spike shared anything to teach any of us how to improve our EC game yet? Even a little bit?

 

Ok, so I think I see what you are after now. The event q is an instance of losing 150u, and this has a probability of 0.001613, which is the inverse of p = 0.998387, which is a successful attack. The worst case scenario is when you have two q events occur back-to-back (because they can't get any closer than that), and the probability of this happening is 0.001613^2 = 2.601769E-6, or 1 in approximately 384,354. For some perspective, this is roughly equivalent to 18 reds in a row. Is q worked out mathematically from your progression or is it an empirical estimate?