Roulette Reading Randomness

Casino gambling is not an income producer .That is a fact .

Get a job or trade in the market with discretionary funds .

 

Here is what can't be taught. I can explain it with two stories. In WWII if you were in the 8th Airforce with bombing raids over Germany you were well advised to consider yourself already dead. With that you could focus on the job at hand. It worked. No more worry. You were dead so you might just as well do a great job and carry on. Now In Yosemite rock climbing it's just the opposite. You focus in order to stay alive. The only thing that matters is the next hand hold or foot hold. You focus on that 100% and eventually you top out and its's done. You are alive but you never focused on that. Your mind was on the job. Your mind can keep you in a state of logic but your body chemistry will try to sabotage that effort. Not just emotions but endorphins cause different parts of the brain to react more dominant at times. You must do what the rock climber does. You must stay focused on each bet. You can't become passive when a bad patch occurs. It's laziness. You can't give in to it. You can control the session if you remain in control. You can't change the spin by spin results. But you can decide when to attack and when to lay low. Hope that helps, and even more I hope that makes sense.

 

There were day time raids when over 260 B 17 were sot down . Each with a crew of 10.

 

That does help and it does make DEEP sense. You nailed it. When its easy you get used to it. When its hard you get lazy and just want to get over with it.
There are some crypto gambling sites that give you btc and other crypto for free to play on dice EC. I'll atempt to grow that exponentially. That will be the mountain.

 

Nobody wants to do that because it's too much work. They want rules to follow, look how upset they got when I said there are no rules that I use when I make a bet. Every spin can change everything and you have to be ready for it. Compulsive gamblers have two main traits, greed and laziness. They want everything for nothing and as much of it as they can get. This is why they usually fail.

I remember years and years ago at GG I made a deal with a guy who was a math whiz and pretty well-known on gambling forums. I agree to show him how to do what I did and I would get a percentage of what he won. I would never do that now I shouldn't have done it then. In the process of making the deal I said the only caveat is you can't show anybody else, you can't teach it to anybody else. So about 5 minutes later I asked him how is going to go about playing this in the casino. He says the first thing he's going to do is round up 12 people he trusts and show them how it works and send them out all over the place to make money in team play. I couldn't believe it, I just told him five minutes ago he had to keep it to himself he totally was not listening to me because his mind was running on greed and impatience. Of course I never went through with the deal why would I. He went crazy called me every name in the book. LOL

 

LOL

 

They want rules to follow, look how upset they got when
I said there are no rules that I use when I make a bet.-Spike

That said, according to Gizmotron you collaborated with him on the
Reading Randomness' even chances bet, which consists of loose guidelines.

Without rules how can there be discipline on anything?

 

The rules might be set by the bettor as he sees it .

 

We agreed with each other about each of our own discoveries as we both dropped hints. We even kept the same secret from everyone independently. I came up with the strategic guidelines in order to deal with a lack of self control. The rigid limitations forces the end of a session. They are based on the concepts of betting on moving averages like are seen in stock trading. Both of us use a win goal stop point. That conclusion was reached independently and is each his own idea. There is a third that came to similar conclusions too. Lungyeh has a thread here that shows what he means in the Baccarat section.

 

Most gamblers do not remember the losses only the wins and convince themselves they win more than they lose.
Anything that has no structure is going to fail unless if you are the exception to the rule which we know that is very very very rare.

 

I set out to validate RR with the 3 / 7 strategy. You must end the session at three net wins. You must end the session at 7 net losses. You must also document all sessions, win or lose. Several people have done this. Who knows how many others that never wrote in use it? Spike uses One net win and done. I don't know when he declares and end to a difficult session. He can speak for himself. I explain the only way seven net losses can happen. It's when a swarm of first attempted bets lose in an almost global type of a sequence. You stop betting after all losses except for singles on the weak side. In that case you still stop at three net wins. All this is explained and why in the thread. With these strict rigged stop points and complete honest records you can prove to yourself if it works or not. There is no room for error. You will go from 47% to around 66% if you actually learn the read randomness. If you chose to ignore the characteristics that are the most common then you will not progress.

 

Depends on what your definition of structure is. Christians believe atheists cannot be moral because we don't believe in the Christian structure of morality. But the results are pretty much the same with an atheists non structured moral outlook. By the way there are 100 times more Christians in prison than atheists and it's not just because there are more Christians. Atheists tend to take morality more seriously because we have nobody telling us what to do.

I don't have what you call structure in my roulette method yet it feels like structure to me because there are so many things I won't do. There are far more things I do not do and won't do in making a bet.

 

I do not get why we must end the session at three net wins and not more?
The way you describe it we 'MUST' end the session at 3 net wins it is like you play a hit and run game
and being scared to play longer.

Give an example of a red black series how are you going to play it and i will continue the questioning
based on what we know after all these years with facts.

 

I am not talking about what i believe or you or someone else about roulette.
There are facts that no one can deny.

 

I don't just play red/black series. I play to find the best looking continuing characteristic, examples: single on weak side, absence of singles, domination of strong side, nothing larger than triples, etc... I look in six different sets of groupings simultaneously. To teach that I created this thread to be a self taught communication of the idea and skill of it. I'm not going to personally tutor you. You do the work on your own and then are qualified to answer the questions that you have now. I made all this up from nothing but playing experience and lost pay checks. I'm handing it to you on a plater for free. If you don't like the way that I'm doing this then you can just go suck eggs. You have it in your lap. It takes work to be a great musician. It takes work to be a great anything. Spouting off your demands, knowing that you have not bothered to do very much reading at all, exampled by your request here, I don't see where anyone should care just how you deal with me or this thread. I don't care if you have it in your lap and you reject it. Those that do the work to get skillful have my respect. Those that try to manipulate me or intimidate me with inclusion or exclusion can go jump into a burning building. I'm never going to personally tutor you. Stop being lazy. Now run away with your excuse not to see for yourself. Too many people have already demonstrated that they can learn this just from this thread. None of them made me jump through hoops like some kind of a trick dog.

 

Geez. I just told you but you have a lot of bone between your ears. So I will say it to you again. "I set out to validate RR with the 3 / 7 strategy."

Now if you want to prove to yourself that the math that you probably believe right now is going to be the result, then walk away. But if you have an open scientific mind for discovery, then I suggest you stick to the 3 / 7 brackets and document your results. Sure you can massacre a casino if the win streak is a monster. But can you adjust as it ends or sputters along imperfect? You can't fight in the big arena with the champion of the world until you can protect yourself. It's the primary rule of the ring. Right now you are not skilled enough to go toe to toe with a casino. And as you know right now I will not hold your hand and walk you through this. You have the road map. See it for yourself.

 

"You have the weapon, use the weapon." It's from a movie I really liked. That is why the 3 / 7 strategy and documentation as you gain skill is there. You can prove to yourself what is what. All you have to do is write it down. You must learn randomness characteristic formations. They are used as an identification tool to recognize things that are in a state of continuation. You would never get that from watching me play. It's a foreign language with its own syntactical inferences. You must know why it can change from working to not working and how you deal with that common reality. It's not a one sided win all the time deal. If you can't or won't accept this then this is not for you. You are looking for a non existent magical Martingale styled progression.

 

Reading Randomness needs a feedback of several examples of actual play .


Strategies for the singles might be good examples .

 

I have realized that in the past. That is why I wrote the AI version for double or single dozen betting as an example based computer application. It proves that RR goes through win and loss phases by making guesses on trends and patterns. I did that so that people could have an endless supply of examples of how I make decisions for guessing. Now I never bothered to make a version for the EC's.

All RR needs is anyone to learn the skills and apply them in honest bracketed conditions recommended with 3 / 7 stopping point tactics. And for that person to write down the results of each session. From that real data anyone can determine their own progress and win to loss results.

 

To avoid any misunderstandings single do not mean single numbers .


With all that single number talk at another forum .