Roulette Ask Me Anything About Betting the EC's (Even Chances)

Follow the logic. Number 4 means that it's pointless to look for the patterns.

 

No it is not. It is pointless for you to comment on this anymore because you obviously do not understand what I know, and what I do. Would you like to put me to a challenge of some kind? I will accept it. Then I will put you to a challenge also.

 

David,

Then why would one EC be more likely to hit on the next spin than another?

Logic, it's always in the way.

 

In fact, that is the weakness of the game. It's why I don't like the outcomes from RNG's, they are not true random and are prone to do screwy things in the short-term. True random is much more dependable because each outcome is totally independent from the last outcome.

 

This is because the cult you're in discourages you from being led off the path. Some branches of the cult of Christianity will tell you do not read anything about other religions because it will confuse you. You cannot read Gizmos thread because you are terrified he might be onto something and you could not explain it.

 

You are confusing me with Gizmo who lives in a trailer park in California. I live in a nursing home according to you, remember? Do try and keep your own bullshit straight

 

This is very very common for people who play the Martingale. In fact many of them rarely place a bet past the third step. But the death sequence is always waiting in the wings and it will get you, it gets everybody.

 

It's not more likely to hit, it's never more likely to hit. That would be impossible. Outcomes in roulette run in phases, certain scenarios are repeated over and over and over. When you learn how to read the random and become familiar with these phases you can make an educated guess as to what might be coming next. It has nothing to do with probability and has everything to do with experience and observation. Math people can never wrap their heads around this, it makes no sense to them.

 

You insisted you didn't live in a home. I gave you break.

Have it your way then, back into the home you go.

 

It makes no sense to anyone who understands what random is and means. It means unpredictable.

If there are "phases" you are saying it's not random anymore, no longer is it a 1/37 outcome or 18/37 for an EC to hit.

You are saying during these "phases" there is lower entropy because the wheel can't produce information at the usual rate because some pockets just will not be hit as often as random dictates. This is the only way a prediction can be more accurate.

If any of these things are true then the anomaly will be reflected in the distribution of outcomes during those "phases". We know that maintained wheels do not have these artefacts.

You can't have it both ways saying there are "phases" where you can guess better than random and at the same time say the outcomes are randomly distributed but you can still guess/predict it better than random.

It is one or the other and we all know which one it is.

 

Why you persist in this nonsense is beyond me. I guess you would say that's because I'm a "math" person, whatever that means.

"It's never more likely to hit"
"My win rate is 80%"
"Outcomes in roulette run in phases"
"I don't predict anything"

Your posts are a masterclass in contradiction, ie, gibberish. In this post-truth woke world it's trendy to assert that facts and logic are merely the hegemony of the old white man and hierarchical patriarchy. Are you by any chance a black disabled lesbian, and not an old white man? But you can't argue against logic, facts, and reason because then you would be using logic, facts and reason to deny them, so all you can do is make assertions, get emotional, abusive, or violent. "Might is right". Or maybe you just think contradictions make you sound profound.

My favourite is "it has nothing to do with probability and everything to do with experience and observation". So probability doesn't change as a result of experience and observation? D'uh. It can and does, and it's called Bayesian probability, which seems to be what you and gizmo are doing, without the numbers. But that doesn't change the essential incoherence of your statements.

Bayesian inference is a method of statistical inference in which Bayes' theorem is used to update the probability for a hypothesis as more evidence or information becomes available. Bayesian inference is an important technique in statistics, and especially in mathematical statistics. Bayesian updating is particularly important in the dynamic analysis of a sequence of data. Bayesian inference has found application in a wide range of activities, including science, engineering, philosophy, medicine, sport, and law. In the philosophy of decision theory, Bayesian inference is closely related to subjective probability, often called "Bayesian probability".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayesian_inference

 

We have free Wi-Fi way better than any trailer park.

 

Yes absolutely unpredictable. I can't make predictions only guesses.

You're only dealing with 37 or 38 pockets on a wheel so you're going to get nothing but repeat scenarios or phases where these scenarios occur. It takes experience and observation to see them.

One has nothing to do with the other. Phases are simply something that happens when you're dealing with such a limited number of random outcomes. You are bound to have scenarios that do nothing but repeat over and over and over. Sometimes I can't see them at all and I don't bet because nothing is playing my game. Sometimes this is happening at every Casino online that I look at. Gizmo calls this the Global Effect, and it's pretty dang weird but it's a thing. You make a big deal out of educated guessing but the real power in this method is knowing when not to bet because the likelihood is you will lose. This goes against everything the casino stands for, they want every player to bet on every outcome of whatever game they're playing because if you do that you're at the mercy of the house edge. God forbid you learn when not to bet and develop an edge of your own.

Three or four years ago I was in my local casino at a table where I knew the dealer it wasn't very busy. I stupidly said to her, today I'm going to win $100 and leave, that's my goal. So I bet when I should have didn't bet when I shouldn't have and 30 minutes later I had $100 and I cashed out. She actually said to me, in a low voice, don't let the casino now that you do this because they will start watching you. They hate people who win, she said. Kind of blew my mind because no dealer has ever been that candid with me.

 

I persist in it because it's true. And yes, math people, and you're all the same, are taught to think in a very specific way, in a very linear way. Anything outside of that linear way of thinking sounds crazy to you so you have to dismiss it and even put your fingers in your ears and hum really loud so you don't have to hear about it. I'm sure you think you're unique but you say exactly the same things that every math person has said to me for the last 16 years. It's like listening to a broken record. You think you are speaking irrefutable truth. To me you sound like the priest who used to burn witches at the stake in their ignorance. There is obviously more outside of the realm of what you were taught but you will never acknowledge it, just like the priests would never acknowledge it. And no it's not magic or clairvoyance or voodoo or precognition, it's just common sense. It's just a result of study and observation. That's where all discoveries come from you know, study and observation.

 

They are only contradictions to you, not to me.

 

In football, the coach tells the team with his white board, "Listen up, once defence get possession of the ball, quarterback has to send the ball to the right wide receiver in under 5 seconds, that's what you have to do in transition".

 

Say that you really have such abilities and know what will be. Because it is not math, not calculations - then that is possible to apply also in other places.
Don't you think it's a little small to apply such abilities to roulette? There are places where you can earn hundreds of times more with this kind of ability...

 

I don't know anything that will 'be'. All I am familiar with is the 37 or 38 outcomes in roulette. All I know is the phases and scenarios that the outcomes of roulette present. Please explain how this is relevant to anything else but roulette. Why would you possibly think the any of this would apply to anything outside of roulette. Maybe you're a mental patient, could that be it? Please do not stop taking your medication.

 

I think - you are more similar to a mental patient who is just delusional... about his winnings which are based on nothing...

 

lol, that's the definition of relativism. It's worse than arguing that gravity exists for everyone but you. Please jump off a tall building and prove us wrong.

That could only be said by someone who is clueless about math. The most interesting math is non-linear.
Ironically, you're being very dogmatic about math which is the very thing you accuse us of. Pot, kettle, black.
We are willing to test your ideas but you are completely closed-minded.