Roulette Ask Me Anything About Betting the EC's (Even Chances)

Here's a tough question for you. What is the difference between having a conversation with Spike and Giz, or with those in an insane-asylum? Those in an insane-asylum are much more reasonable.

 

Yeah, we are the ones who think the Martingale is the Holy Grail. LOL we are the ones that are insane..

 

I think Fitjam is better - "Fuck I'm Thick, just ask me".

 

Yeah there's nothing more to say and sums it up nicely.

Given there are no reasonable answers to the corner that the RR brigade have painted themselves into I think we can pronounce this thread a clear dead end, the charade has been clearly exposed.

@David Gregory probably better to continue your explorations on another thread and let this one wither.

Of course the handwaving by Spike and co will continue as that is what they do.

 

The only thing that's been exposed is your ignorance. You don't know what questions to ask, you don't know how to think outside the box, because you can't do something you think nobody can do it. You know what you know and you have no intention of learning anything else. Meanwhile the casino will continue to pay me and pay me and pay me every time I play. You have no argument against this:

https://www.gamblingforums.com/thre...e-ecs-even-chances.22969/page-132#post-147891

 

Handwaving.

Refer to https://www.gamblingforums.com/posts/147897/

 

You are the one who's trapped at the pitiful 50% level, you are no better than a ploppie. All your arguments are circular, you repeat the same things over and over, ask the same questions over and over, draw the same conclusions from your preconceived ideas and think you have accomplished something. You have accomplished absolutely nothing because you have not shown that I cannot be doing what I'm doing. I just told you what my method was and you cannot refute any of it because it's irrefutable and you know it. You know it would work if you could do it but you can't do it and you'll never be able to do it.
.

 

The onus is on you to demonstrate a principle that can beat 18/37 or 18/38.

We all agree the wheel has 37 (or 38) pockets.

We all agree the ball can land in any of those pockets with equal chance.

YOU have to demonstrate that something you are doing beats the 18 pockets you are betting on vs the 37 or 38 the ball can land in.

It's random and cannot be predicted. So where is the magic?

Stop handwaving and put up or shut up.

 

Hey ! How is possible to show that you cant do when you never show that you can !

 

Please don't take offence, but the longer this goes on the more you sound like an idiot.

You remind me of a very dear deceased friend of mine whom I was entrusted to inter as sadly, no one else stepped up. He also played a marty but on the dozens not the EC's. In the end he was shown to be also an idiot.

Unlike you playing at the kitchen table, my friend was a high roller with all the bells and whistles casino comps including free weekend apartment accomodation. He played big, upstairs on the high limit tables. Thousand bucks a pop type stuff.

This guy, like you thought

he was unbeatable. I tried to tell him he was dancing on a stick of dynamite. Many times he would lose his playing bankroll, from memory I think it was $8000 each night. For a handful of years he would regain the bankroll and move again into profit. Good times for sure.

I'm not privvy to the monetary details, but eventually the martingale progression he had played for years gave him a pummeling he could not live with. He was found shortly after hanging from a tree in his backyard and I was called into the coroners office to identify the body.

Best you stay at the kitchen table.

 

He's attempting to shift the burden of proof onto us by using the argument from ignorance, which is a fallacy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance

But actually, we have proved that he can't do what he's claiming. His argument goes something like this:

1. I use past outcomes to make an educated guess about the next outcome.
2. Past outcomes are independent.
3. Independent outcomes have no bearing on future outcomes.
Therefore, I win 80% of my bets by looking at past outcomes: "QED"

He agrees with the premises, which the conclusion contradicts.

 

Please do not alert the casinos about this, geniuses. I played six different online casinos tonight and made my one unit goal at each one on the 1st bet. Please do not ruin this for me and tell them I'm not doing what I'm do or they might stop paying me. Seriously, you are all pathetic fools who cannot see what is right in front of you. It's really amazing how stupid smart people can be. I can totally understand why the Catholic Church locked up Galileo for saying the Earth revolved around the Sun. He was dealing with pathetic ignoramuses like you people who could not find your own assholes with a flashlight in a map. LOL

 

Don't ruin it for the rest of us, we want him to take his life savings to the casino. He has a million dollars in the bank you know. Snicker..

 

I just figured it out. Spike thinks there are less pockets.

That's it!

But spike (and his wife) never heard of "Argument from ignorance" and he says they "is well read". You will need to use a different argument.

 

No need for all the handwaving.

Can you just state the principle that your system uses to beat random?

133 pages and nothing.

 

Simple question Spike.

Do you agree the ball is equally likely to land in any of the pockets on the next spin?

Yes or No?

 

Galileo was one of the mathboyz, and I think he'd agree with us about your claims. What's REALLY amazing is that casinos are still offering roulette as a game and have been since their existence, given that there must be quite a large number of punters who aren't "pathetic fools who cannot see what is right in front of them". Maybe most of them wouldn't be able to match your 80% win rate, but even a paltry 55% win rate would be enough to make the casinos sit up and take notice. Look what happened when card counting arrived and the steps they took to thwart a measly 2 or 3% edge, let alone your whopping 60%. Yet strangely we hear nothing about it. Roulette players are still welcomed in casinos around the world, which are seemingly unaware that their profits are being eroded under their very noses. What pathetic fools they must be!

 

One unit goal was reached on the first bet!
And that is a goal of a player who guesses right in 80%. That is very strong !!!

 

"One of the weirder aspects of quantum mechanics could be explained by an equally weird idea – that causation can run backwards in time as well as forwards. What Einstein called "spooky" action at a distance could theoretically be evidence of retrocausality, which is the particle equivalent of you getting a stomach ache today thanks to tomorrow's bad lunch."

Think about it !

There is an another point to remember: From the whole electromagnetic spectrum point of view we people are very VERY blind. There is lot of happening around us what we don't know and understand at all.

 

This is the first post that you are actually telling the truth. Good for you.