Roulette Ask Me Anything About Betting the EC's (Even Chances)

I posted an alternative martingale progression just for you David:

https://www.gamblingforums.com/threads/martingale-alternative-carsch.24288/​

 

Don't take offense to this, but your friend was stupid. He didn't know when to quit. Like a person who is an alcoholic, just can't get enough. I need to make something very clear to you so that you quit comming off like an ass. I am not stupid enough to actually gamble for real money. Do you? As a hobby I just develop and test strategies. I hit on something that seemed pretty good so I shared it, that's all. I made no claims about it being unbeatable, or it being the holy grail. Look back through the posts and you will see that Spike is the one who tried to make it appear as though I said it, but it was him calling it the holy grail, not me. I get the biggest kick about people saying my use of the Martingale is doomed to incredible financial failure. What's funny about that is I haven't actually played it for real money. If it fails in Play Mode, so what? What have I lost? If you actually gamble for real money and risk real financial loss, that makes you a bigger idiot than me. So, what the hell are you talking about?

 

The entire spooky action at a distance is an artefact of the Copenhagen interpretation which created the "measurement problem". This in effect introduced a global privileged observer being ordained with the "real account" of what happened. This is the source of the spooky action at a distance nonsense.

The fact is, in order to coroborate the results you still must perform system to system interractions.

Relational Quantum Mechanics (RQM) is not blighted by the Copenhagen nonsense that places a special observer outside the quantum system being measured. If you think about it, how can you "measure" anything without yourself interracting with the system and in the process becoming correlated with it? How then can two separate observers compare results without becoming intrinsically correlated with each other and the system they observed? How can a third person also come to a consistent conclusion with the first two without also being bound both to them and the system?

RQM deals with quantum and macro level correlations, the entire retro causality nonsense and spooky action at a distance, super luminal signalling etc completely dissapears.

So no, it's not retro casualty giving Spike an advantage where he is tuning into some precognitive signal from the future.

 

You know Spike, you are the actual fool here. You gamble for real money. I don't. You take real financial risk. I don't. You claim to have an unbeatable strategy. Wouldn't that be the same as claiming you have the holy grail? I have never claimed to have an unbeatable strategy or it being the holy grail. That idiocy comes from you. You are the one who has something to lose. I don't. Actually, you have lost something more important than money. You have lost all credibility.

 

Let me take a shot and guess what his answer will be to that question. "What an idiot. don't you realize the ball isn't actually there. It is all in your mind. I do not play according to where the nonexistant ball is going to land. I wait until it is playing my game, when Jupitar aligns with Mars and the Moon turns blue." I'll bet I guessed it fairly close.

 

IMO this has to be the second stupidest trhread on the internet the first was on VLS but its neck and a neck right now to being the first . fucking children

 

I'll give this progression a shot. I have not seen this one before. I have tried every progression out there and they all suck. The Martingal has proved to be the best one so far with my bet selection. When it comes to the pattern WLWLWL, I am always on the right betting side of that one anyway. I am always betting the right side of streaks also. If hitting a win on 2 outcomes in a row is a big part of this progression, it may do me some good because that happen a lot more than not. If anybody is reading this post other than TwoUp, let's be real clear here. This is just a test, nothing more. TwoUp is claiming nothing about this progression good or bad. That's the difference here, some offer suggestions, and others just brag and offer nothing.

 

Are you refering to anybody in particular?

 

What is the heading on this thread ? This should say it all.

 

You are basically talking about paying attention &or perceiving 'distribution dynamics' .. categorized in some way or another, according to your background-based terminology.

For that is essentially required a great capacity of what is known as abstract, not linear, thinking;
in some way by a way of deduction &or perhaps disqualifying,
meanwhile linear type of thinking .. which is basically an addition of various building blocks.

Abstract thinking is highly developed in/by professional artists, of those who deal with art extensively as a hobby,
&or those who have mastered some type of field"linearly" bit by bit .. & then suddenly break out or break free by coincidence or intentionally & properly, suddenly being able to see & perform within the ocean of opened possibilities.

Abstract capacity, especially fluent one, in whichever terminology then expressed as it supersedes them all, requires either a looot & extensive of experience in a particular field, or a hugely talented individual (overall or in particular field) cultivating the talent in his/her own creative way;

a great example of the latter (mentioning him due to majority being familar with him & nothing else) is Jimmy Hendix -- a guy has never learnt a note in his life, but due to his abstract talent cultivated he pretty much raise himself & attained the recognition of legend, if not a tzar in his/music field;

the other way around, would a guy/girl building his brain connection incorporated in-sync with the body dynamic (movements) by eg. attending a classical music college→university, or someone learning a huge variety of songs in multiple music styles or genres .. & then breaking off of all of that .. composing in his own way (based on all of that experience distilled as an abstract-level functioning & manifestation);

if you ever asked Hendrix to explain his music & talent .. with notes, which is a norm & standard in music community or realm, especially 'within' the academia, being drilled into them as a background for the purposes of building the ability to express & communicate = inter-change, exchange (import, export of)the highly abstract forms of .. what music essentially is --

the guy would be completely flabbergasted, & if not for his music actually being presented, & thereof due to their background, symbology & terminology being able to be "translated" by the process of induction into linear form building blocks .. they would be too .. being at lack.

 

So, give @SPIKE a break

Just because your background & standardized modus operandi is alien to, or at least incompatible with Spike's, you not being able to interpret &or translate the superseding abstract forms of his modus operandiinto with you compatible language & terminology leaving his reluctance to extend his way(s) in a comprehensive manner aside for now;

does not in any way invalidate his method, even less so him as an individual, paving his own (to you incomprehensible) way.

 

Well put.

 

Yep.

 

How many more times are you going to ask me this? That's my question. I probably answered this question from you seven or eight times refer to my former posts, douchebag.

 

Let's see you do it smart ass. Time After Time After Time

 

When you have a tiny math brain like these morons do it does. They have been trained to think in a certain way and that's all they know how to do. Meanwhile the casino keeps paying me and paying me and paying me and that's all that matters. For some reason these idiots here think what they say matters and the truth is, what my dog does on the sidewalk matters more than what these fools think. Because it doesn't change the reality of anything, I'm still playing and I'm still winning. I laid out what my method is and how I arrive at my decisions, it's a foreign language to their tiny brains.

 

The very first time I studied a roulette marquee was in 2004 sitting there waiting for my wife to get done losing at the slot machines. And in my head I was winning and I thought this is easy this is what everybody must do. So I looked into it and never looked back.

 

So you must have all the secrets then, Gramps. Please enlighten us stupid children and show us the path to roulette enlightenment. Snickering guffaw..

 

I never take a risk when I play roulette, I have an eighty percent hit rate dumbass. If you think it bothers me did I have no credibility on a gambling forum you don't know me at all. You people matter less than the gunk that forms between my toes. The only people I need credibility from are in the casino and my credibility with them is golden because they pay me every time I win and that's everyday, every session they pay me. The only reward you have is when you take a break from your kitchen table and grease up your left hand and watch Pornhub for a while. Lol

 

I wouldn't go as far as call them morrons .. quite a few of them are quite intelligent @Benas, @Median Joe , @TwoUp, @Dr Sir Anyone Anyone .. & well-versed in the fields they chose/determined to operate;

.. but trained/conditioned to operate in a certain way, & thus blind to some other angles ..

& yet, who knows, all it takes is one lightning strike, one so much improbable brain connection that enlightens/brightens the brain as a whole .. taking all the so far knowledge to a whole new level & establishing a whole new paradigm.