Roulette Ask Me Anything About Betting the EC's (Even Chances)

Educated guessing, reading random, intuition, precognition or whatever it is he does. Your educated guess is as good as mine.

 

You know, you are like a fisherman who brags about how many fish he has caught but cannot tie up a basic knot, cannot distinguish a catfish from a pike, cannot tell which rod of two is better...etc...

What does this bragging get you?

That's understandable - but what's the use?
You can write that you are a billionaire, that you are cooler than Elon Musk...but that won't make you any richer or cooler...

Or do you really think that everyone believes that you are a first-class player?
If such will be - your aim will be not one unit - that is for sure...

 

i have tested certain strategies where it was very easy to win with simulator site, but rng it had much more complicated. You literally felt that immediately. The results stats did not match with simulator even if sessions were won

 

The internet is full of tall fish stories .


NEXT.

 

No one ever loses in the gambling forums . But WHO is losing at the casinos ?

 

N.D. What are you insinuating?
That we should rename the forum 'Fantasy Island'

 

Now that is very interesting. I'm only concerned about the quality of the game there. Is R-Sim useful for validation purposes or not? It keeps every bet placed and allows anyone to view each bet step by step. You would like to think with that much telemetry that they would not skew the results. Anyone have a problem with R-Sim?

 

Lol, as stated before, even if you hold their hands and let them use my money to place the winner bet they will still deny it’s a win even as they go to the cashier and put the cash in their own wallet. The drive home they still deny you won them the money, they watch and watch the video of their own play , they see your hand holding their hand to place the winning bet lol. They just want to lose. Nothing new here.

 

Good post. Fair call, I’ll think about that. You may want to work on getting a sense of humour and become the alround guy, lol.

 

one member here who is very acknowledged and intelligent has also claimed many peoples have noticed they win at that simulator site, but results on RNG are still quite different. One scenarium is who ever created that site - wondered how people can finally win in roulette, because most of them are all loosing, so he tweaked perhaps something where you see streaks more often and are able to win so people can be happy or Online roulette is still rigged somehow where its not possible to win. Either one of them may play dirty game.
You have lot of experience - you can play your own way and see are the results really matching there compared to casinos. You will notice is your winning ratio really better after completing certain amount of games. I think it would be helpful to members also to see your randomness live how you tame that wheel

 

The Stu Pitts were right there attacking Spikes method of play instead of giving it a try .

He l eft a trail of information to be acted upon .


But they chose the rectum of a marti player to crawl u p instead .

 

Great post Mansi19896. If the ability to see trends and patterns has in fact been deliberately manipulated there then you could perhaps catch that out. Still the only thing that matters is hunting for the phases of coincidences that are in a condition of working. You don't need to manipulate outcomes to see this come and go. With enough groupings something somewhere is almost always in a phase of working. But it's just like politics. Anyone that wants to can have their own set of facts and from them a simple logical conclusion is easily formed. So the mathZombies only need their own set of facts and all that work I'm doing would be pointless to them. What is gratifying to me might be that the creators of that sim went all out to confirm Reading Randomness while I have never given them a dime. I guess they just like iconoclastic rabble rousers. That would also tweak the senses of the noble bean counters. Be careful what you might claim. The consequences of claiming collaboration between RR and R-Sim might get a person unwanted attention. Confirmation bias, once proven by an academic among his peers, has a tendency to bring out the best of those that love to cancel others.

 

The as crawler led by a contingent math nzombies .

 

Seems like everybody is getting it all twisted. People confusing SPIKES winning every session with winning every spin.

Y’all pressing SPIKE for proof and his method of play. Believe it not, but he’s been revealing his methods bit by bit in some of his posts. Y’all failed to see it.
Just like you guys failed to see what we see when it comes to RR.

 

No need for Spike to proof anything. He is not a selling a system just discussing EC.


The Stu Pitt clan needed a baloney festival and they got . by their own choice .

 

There is NO proof at a game of luck.

 

Yep, you can hit them over the head with clues and they still won't get it because they literally want you to come to their house and show them how to do it. And even then they wouldn't believe it so showing actual proof is a fool's errand.

 

Can I contact you for advice on all facets of my life? How did I live this long without you guiding me. Do you charge for all this advice? I certainly hope not you'd starve to death.

 

You give yourself way too much credit, I don't give one shit what you or anybody here thinks about what I do. That should be obvious by now. I only care what the casino thinks because they pay me.

 

Let it be ... let be for you better