Roulette R-Sim - Giz2 - Reading Randomness Validation

Okay, fair enough.

 

Perfect example.

 

I'm not suited to Martingale. I'm giving up on the RR - Marti experiment. Just flat betting with the hedge bet and virtual bets, like I started out.

 

I started out flat betting with a hedge bet. Then I tried a Martingale. That's done for obvious reasons.

 

I like smooth equity curves (they scale-up the best) so no Marti-monkeys for me too.

 

I thought previous to this game you said no more Marty. So you started out flat betting and that didn't work, so you changed to using the Marty? You know what I think, I think you didn't use the Marty at all, it's just an excuse for your flat betting strategy failing. If you actually did use the Marty towards the end, then you are not a man of your word. Witch is it?

I just played a rated game 20 or so minutes ago. That's how you use a Marty with a recovery strategy.

 

Someday I'll be wrong but it ain't today.

 

The bets are there to see. I take it you can read? I started out flat betting and it did work. And now I'm going to keep going.

 

Turbo, late for the party...

 

It did work until it took a complete nose dive when you were about 600.00+. That's close to a 3,600.00 draw down. A heck of a hole to dig out of. Why don't you do a reset and start from scratch and play your strategy exactly as you do with no goofing around this time.

 

Here's a game I played, but unfortunately I didn't have it on Rated Mode. I started with a 5.00 base unit and watched if I was hitting well. I was, so at spin 152 I switched to a 25.00 base unit and stopped at a 1,000.00 win.

 

Deja vue Ted Mackiacks original amateur hour ?

 

There is no substitute for victory.

 

I'm just going to go out on a limb and say "This is easy to put down on the "crowded" table at the casino too !

I mean, it's just 71 $5.00 chips. I'll bet there's still 3-4 minutes left before "no more bets"



Honest question though - just asking...... fair enough ?

Why don't you just bet 1,2 or 3 numbers instead of 73% of the table in one bet ?
I'm being serious - throw rocks if you want, insults don't bother me.
If this "reading random" ability exists as you say - why not bet 3 or less numbers and win easily ?
I'm doing just that, so don't say it's impossible or magic....
47 games in for me - FLAT betting only, 3 numbers max and + $23,198.00. So why not do that ?
No progression, no supernatural powers, just flat betting.
I'm seriously curious why you need to cover that many numbers when the next spin is going to be a single number.
In that case of the game you just played, it was #23 - why not just have bet #23 and taken the full payout
instead of losing every single other bet on the table which made your actual win amount so much smaller ?
Thanks for your kind reply.

 

You really have no idea what can be done. This is nearly proof that you don't actually play in real casinos. From the time that the dealer rakes the losing chips, and moves on to pay all the winners, is at least 30 seconds, sometime a full minute on a full table on a Saturday night. Several tables have players playing more than 100 chips at a time after the dealer removes the puck. My hands are faster than the dealers I have no problem dropping 3, 4, or 5 chips per number long before the other slower players are done. I'm smarter too. I know where the chips must be dropped and can move from one side of the table to the other, the long way, in one pass. That takes skill acquired from years of real play. So you will have to admit this much. You suck at Roulette. You are never going to win this argument. You are clueless. There must be video of players placing huge numbers of chips somewhere.

 

They are not insults. They are observations that you are clueless regarding live B & M play at busy tables. An Insult would be degrading you with appropriate pejorative condescending remarks and ad hominin baloney to illustrate by irony what you are doing. The problem is that it has no effect on you. You are very bad at seeing yourself. And that is what is amusing. I hooked you with your own admitted ineptness. And you are blazing away with sophistry in a defensive mechanism attempt to equate disbelief. In simple terms you are trying the BS your way out of this.

 

This is not about you and your baloney festival. Where is the throng of people touting the greatness of TurboGenius? Has a single person come forward to validate your skills?

 

What planet are you on? You are a simple minded baloney artist with several fallacies about Roulette. And best of all you have no clue that you are wrong about them. The only reason I'll talk to you is that you are fun to tie in knots and go on public display. Thanks for your kind big mouth.

 

This is my favorite line of all. This implies that your egotistical high tone remarks in general are just clickbait. It's that as you toy with the suckers or you are just doing us all a big favor by allowing us to be in your presence.

 

I understand your frustrations.

If I were at rank #1,072 after 17 sessions with barely any spins played and failing -
and had to deal with someone like me, I'd be frustrated too.
I'd probably use that negative energy to learn from someone with more knowledge and get myself
on the right track.

Still climbing here - #79 so far, all flat bet with no progression on 1-3 numbers only and + $30,148.00
A few thousand spins... I completely understand your anger.

You are right about one thing, I've never once in my life seen a person put 70+ chips on a table for a spin.
I'd like to see that though, I would laugh myself out of the chair watching them frantically go at it
before "no more bets" is called.
Meanwhile, I'll sit and relax - bet 1-3 numbers with a flat bet and watch the show.

I'll stay out of your thread, you have some winning to do to get back to even - unless another failure
comes along "on purpose" (of course) and if it helps, you can yell at me in irate posts some more.

I'm thinking Bago 2.0 is a better name for you - although even he listened and learned between the insults.