Roulette If you need an Xtreme coder

If anyone needs it (for a small fee), I can code your systems for Roulette Xtreme. I don't do that for money but it still involves my time! In case, PM me .

 

No need to PM you. I need a coder to validate Reading Randomness. Your fee will be paid by your success. It is an enormous and rewarding task. It is a mechanical form of Artificial Intelligence in that the AI is not a learning process for the programing application by itself but that the software is a slave to your mind. You teach the software to act as an extension of your skilled mind. To do that you must become skilled and successful at Reading Randomness.

The Reading Randomness thread is an extension of my mind in the form of attempting to program people. It's purpose is to validate Reading Randomness. It's already in front of you with the slings and arrows that you will face if you can accomplish this task. I would love it is you can program this validation. It's a good thing to do. You will save the lives of those that inherently fail in life by using money that they need for other important things like surviving.

 

Hallo Gizmo, it's funny that you mention that, Randomness is why and how I learned to code.
Well mainly through repeaters I have to say, in fact I coded almost anything you can think of from TG forum and not only that.
Anyway, I'll certainly check the thread!

 

Hello Marc0s, very generous of you to offer your Xtreme coding services.

I am interested to know what exactly you consider a repeater, and just how far down the rabbit hole you are willing to pursue the concept?

For instance, if #14 hits, then #14 hits again do you consider the repeater to simply be #14? or is the repeater also, Red, Low, Even, Doz 2, Col 2, Line 3, Street 5, Finale 4, Numerology base #5?

 

Hello Bombus, sorry if my written english is a bit rusty. I've been investigating mostly straight numbers and I've gone pretty deep down that hole, but I suppose it never ends. To summarize briefly, the idea revolves around what is constant about randomness. I followed the ideas of TG to see if it was possible to find a way to read what's going on the wheel in a given session, based on what usually happens with repeaters. To give you an example regarding this matter, I think that Naughty But Nice did a great job in seeing how a number can be spotted as the next hot number by getting closer to the start of the "race" on every repetition. Well, I coded that and tested it on thousands of spins.
Anyway I'm open to any discussion about this and very willing to go down deeper.

 

How detect Naughty a repeater ?

 

Is it 3 horses or 9 horses?

 

Seems pretty clear to me!

 

It seems today the algo is a repeat day on R-sim.

 

Rheti you can see it even with these few spins, look at #24

 

horse race is an independant event, yes?. A roulette spin is an independant event, yes?. What you are showing here is data from SEVERAL independant events. You are taking results from several independant events and you take these as ONE ( a horse race ).

 

from long time ago

Bago

 

"Well, you asked a question... I understand the argument and do not want to reopen it here, but I am referring to a simple fact that a number must occur as 1x, 2x, 3x, 4x, etc., and this always happens, regardless of any independent events. It is not difficult to determine which numbers will repeat; the more pertinent question would be 'when' rather than 'if.'

So here's an interesting question: Since we already know the numbers, is there a way to hold on until they repeat without missing them?"

 

No. The mathZombies are right in this regard. You can chase this with a progression and eventually you will fall off the cliff. All have tried in various ways. You must attack in another way. You must attack this with reading randomness. Now you can call this whatever you want. You can do it in your own way. You can discover this in your own way. You can describe this in your own way. All I have done with this is to describe this in my own way. It is for you to ("shine on you crazy diamond") to put this in the words of Pink Floyd. Do it your own way.

 

1-3-5-7

back to the repeaters
with a twist
i skip the first 10 spins

Bet from 11 to 40
Skip 41 to 50
Bet from 51 to 80
Skip the next 10
Bet 91 to 106

Roughly 5 hrs of Playing

I checked 45 days of Table 4

400 results

Positive

from level 8 a small progression till 12

a profit of 2.7 k euro

 

Yes spins 1-10. You usually get 1 repeat. The question is, is it worth worrying about 1x numbers.
Now after 10 spins, the next 10 spins, the average for repeats is 4. 1+3=4. Those 4 repeats could all be 1x's.
Next is 30 spins and 9 repeats is the usual. Could random give all 9 repeats as 1x. 1+3+5=9.
At 40th spin the repeats are usually 16; 1+3+5+7=16. The LOTT suggest 13 repeats.
If, the stream has given just 1x's and you ignore as only at expectation, how much will you have spent?

So, when the repeats start is random going to make all just 2x?

Rheti nice 2.7

 

500 Results .... 2.7 k profut

No loss no Gain

 

The Repeaters with a twist work, not always but pretty good.

Tested 161 days
a 1 to 9 Bet... flat / only the 9 a progression

theor Probability 74.4 procent
actual 78.2 procent

here the weekly results

1 181 181
2 601 420
3 976 375
4 1193 217
5 1424 231
6 1883 459
7 1839 -44
8 2142 303
9 2351 209
10 2301 -50
11 2124 -177
12 1628 -496
13 2162 534
14 2101 -61
15 2365 264
16 2623 258
17 2831 208
18 2752 -79
19 2781 29
20 2435 -346
21 2541 106
22 2572 31
23 2846 274

 

1 1 1 1
2 1 2 3
3 1 3 6
4 1 4 10
5 1 5 15
6 1 6 21
7 1 7 28
8 1 8 36
9 2 18 54