Roulette Reading Randomness

Hello, Sorry I am just new here but this topic I found it interesting that’s why I join, I am playing like that guy name gizmotron, but I don’t know him, and yes he is right, and I was surprise, and I found this strategy on my very own according to my very own experience and yes I am winning, and I am very surprise that I am playing exactly the way he play, don’t be angry to him, even I don’t know who is he when I read this forum, I was very surprise that someone is playing exactly the way I am playing in roullette . Sorry my English is not good as I am Asian. I bet 40 usd in 1 number the particular number in red, depending to the stability of thd projected result shows, and I need only few games, but I keep playing that particular pattern until it’s stop and when it’s stop I stop playing , and go home. I read pattern and I don’t place bet all the time unless I saw the pattern start to become stable, I don’t know if pattern is the right term that number shows in the photos I attached 19-25-7-3-3. I understand exactly what gizmotron is talking about and maybe only me who can understand him with his concept. But I can tell you that concept works well even flat bet approach . Sorry if my English is not good because I am Asian .

Thank you,
Evee.

 

i understand exactly what you are talking about, I am very surprise when I read your post, because that is exactly what I am playing for almost 13 years, I understand every single explanation you are talking about, I will not talk more but I attached photo and I am sure you can spot the pattern I followed watching by watching the photos. Like you I ride with the flow of events until It’s stop. I am happy to know that their is another person playing roullette exactly the way I am playing, and this concept I never read in the books or copy to anyone I simply come up to identify it on my own by playing everyday and I put solid beliefs and yes I attack the game from time to time, when I saw a descent opportunity to attack placing a big bets for 5 Numbers to 10 Numbers and the rest is only small bets and yes I am playing 18 Numbers, and sometimes my signature attack is I ride the flow of color until It’s stop, that opportunity is present almost everyday after a long jump of Red and black. If it is keep jumping I am not placing bet I am Just waiting that atleast a stable pattern will Show before I will start to play, and maybe because I am playing this concept for a long time I develop a habit and solid trust to my self when opportunity of pattern shows I never negotiate I place big bets minimum 10 usd for 1 Number and maximum 40 usd and when I am winning I ride with that pattern until It’s stop and when It’s stop, that is my exit point from Casino. Sorry my writing is very bad and my English. I hope you can read this message, that a million miles away their is another human being playing exactly like you for a long time. It’s ok If no one believed you because all of us is different, so It’s ok If no one will agree your experience speaks louder to your own reality.

Cheers,
Evee

 

So this Evee person's comments from here are now listed in the "Scam's" section. Is there a reasons for this?

 

What is this section?

 

Ok, OK, I looked at some of the headers for other possible sections. It's there. OK,

 

OK, Evee's comments are not listed as scams.

Like I say in the RR thread, anyone can come up with their own observations and methods to apply these kind of skills and win using waiting and attacking when in a condition of advantage.

This is why I call this "conditional change."

 

Everyone that knows about counting cards in Blackjack knows about "variable change." The method of waiting for an obvious advantage in 21 is to wait until the cards are ready for the player to be in an advantage condition. Then the player will attack with bigger bets because the player has a better chance of winning. In "conditional change," there is an obvious advantage as long as the coincidental advantage continues. These conditions have a beginning, a middle, and an ending. No math can predict when they will start, how long they will last, and when they will end. So math statistics are useless. Yet, math does still play a part in that all this is part of the overall stats that will add up to a correct overall outcome eventually. So math works as expected. It just has no power to predict what is next.

RR has no power to predict either. There is no way to know when an advantage condition will start, how long it will last, and when it will end occurs. So when math oriented players complain that trends don't work. They are just agreeing that trends don't predict the future. They don't. But! Trends and characteristics more sophisticated like are exposed in this thread, like including elegant patterns, global effects, dominations across groupings, and singles in series are just the foundation for characteristics observations found in Reading Randomness. You must know how to attack, when to attack, and when to end to know how to be effective. Being effective is the important part in all this. It's a skill. It's not just a lucky streak. It's a skill in knowing how and when to end an attack. This is all tru in betting with an advantage state in 21 also. That is a well known method that they even make movies about.

 

@Evee my only question is -- aren't repeats of color & prolonged chop (color jumping) .. both streak

= both the same, essentially ... so why wait!?

 

Suggest reading Frank Barstow principle of diminishing probabilities .

 

Repeat exact patterns of anything is as the same as anything worthwhile. If you see it, and it continues, then you pounce on it. You stay on it until it ends. If it pulsates between occurring and not occurring then you try to pulsate your big bets in the same rhythm. If your strategy is to end the session as you reach a win goal amount then you end the session as another win. You never get to take advantage of the global effect or the elegant pattern. It's still a winning strategy. There's not that much more to this.

 

Let's look at a science that is an open mindedness of redefining cosmology. I'm not talking about nice makeup on a very pretty girl. The idea that spacetime and the Big Bang Theory might be wrong in that fully developed galaxies have been discovered at the far reaches of the so called explosion. That tends to change the belief that the galaxy is expanding because of an explosion. The Webb Telescope sees way back in time, to a time that galaxies were not supposed to be fully developed yet. So if the possibility that creation might just be validated, it might be possible that "Coincidental Change" might be a conformation that Reading Randomness might be a kind of similarity in math to Variable Change." If that is true then the method for using it might be validated as well. The idea that you attack while in a condition of advantage. That would make Reading Randomness players " Advantage Players."

 

E C . Good ye.

 

Taking a rest .

 

With my charting method you can also see what Black was doing.

I track 6 groupings at once with a simple ink pen and a lined index card.

To demonstrate that I will take your spins off this chart by hand and run them in my practice software.

It will take a few minutes and then I will post the image of the results in that chart.

I just want to see what that stretch of spins was doing.

 

here it is:

5
0
19
27
32
13
11
5
24
33
1
7
22
25
9
3
20
18
16
23
6
10
16
20
36
7
14
22
20
24
30
12
15
4
4
25
28
17
5
14
0
34
4
31
22
25
18
7

 

Here is that list flat bet at the very start at $90 per bet. That's $5 on each red number. You can see from the graph that you end up at a win for the dominations. I will go on to check other flat bet results.

 

Hi gizm
I have gone through your couple of pages from this threads and thanks for such wonderful threads and teaching the characteristics of randomness of all kind
I don't have much time to go through all 138 pages , is there a summary in one post ? Of all the different patterns and trends you have posted

 

Unfortunately ...no. One person doing very well on this thread says to read the whole thing 5 times. It took me years to find all these things. I mention things in other threads also. Sometimes people in other threads encourage me to defend my theories. I presented this as a theory in order to validate the method among people that are willing to do the work. Only they are the ones that know that this works. This causes the knowledge of this to pass to others slowly. It's the correct way. That guards everyone's effort to take the time in the first place.

If you use my software to practice you will soon learn that most advantages are in seeing never seen before patterns. It's not just seeing them. You must also identify that they are in a state of working at the time. It's conditional awareness that becomes a skill. It's clearly the cause of coincidence.

 

Reading random, nah, just zigzagged on columns 3&1.
Started with unit bets, then went to 2 unit bet, then 5 unit bets and finally 10 unit bets.
Easier than trying for repeats on R-sim.