Roulette Flat betting single numbers. Three hits per session.

There might be many alternative geometrical patterns to register winning roulette numbers in. A long time ago I looked at Pascal´s triangle, a certain version of solitaire board game and much more. Finally I chose an old fashioned square with 6x6 fields reserved for area 1-36. Without magical mystery tours I simply
reserved the uppper vertical line for the lowest DS, the 2nd for 7-12 and so forth and so one.
Such an alternative arrangement only makes sense dealing with single numbers.

In the 12x3 fields at the roulette table there are 22 squares, squads, corners or carreaux.
In the middle column you find two of the four numbers of each and every squad. So if you dared to bet on the sleeping numbers of any squad, only six sleepers in the 2nd column (i.e. 5, 11, 17, 23, 29, 35) could
make it imposibble to get af full scuad before long.

In my 6x6 fields there are combinations of 2x2 fields. Whenever three of the four fields are filled in, I simply bet the missing number there. And after a hit, I eliminate the 2x2 fields from the rest. In this way
I reduce the number of combinations a bit.
I have found that THREE HITS PER SESSION come before long. Enjoy!

 

Fascinating. There are too many code phrases, acronyms undeclared, and other unknown descriptions to get what you are attempting to communicate, unless a riddle is what you are communicating . But if decoded it might be interesting to figure out what you are saying.

Thanks for a great sounding word salad.

 

1 2 3 4 5 6
7
Imagine that only these numbers have come
(I know that it is not likely. Just trying to enlighten you).
Now simply bet #8 (one unit at a time).
(If more numbers come: Fill in more numbers where they belong.
For example: #36 should be written down in the right corner, between #30 and #35).

1 2
7 8
As you can see, we hit #8.
So 2x2 fields have been filled in. We won. These four fields should be excluded, completely crossed out,
and not play a part in other patterns.

 

You forgot to include your email address and how much it cost to do your project.

 

Being a bit SARKY????
This is completely free; and I can assure you that I am no scammer. ARE YOU?

I´ll try to explain it calmly without offending anybody.

At the roulette table area 1-36 can be seen in three columns. Two of the four numbers of any squad can be seen in the middle column.
There are 22 squads. So (as I tried to explain) the worst case scenario include six chosen sleeping numbers in the middle column which may make it impossible to make all numbers in any squad come for a long time. Six numbers can sleep for much too long.

Within 6x6 fields there are 25 possible combinations of 2x2 fields.
My initial tests were promising. Anyone should be able to do similar tests.
The goal is to win three times (have three hits) within each session.

The upper horizontal group of the 6x6 fields:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
The next horizontal group:
7, 8, 9, 10, 11 12.
And so forth and so on. No magical thinking here.

 

There can be if you think that these pet groupings uncover a weakness. Things work well, flat or neutral, or badly. You must target the good.

 

Lol
Heaven forbid I ruffled your feathers.
Your initial post had all the hallmarks of a scammer, you know big paragraphs, convoluted wording, bit of bait on a gang hook, dressing the pig up and putting lipstick on it and calling it , “3 hits per session comes before long” that’s just dangling a bit of titty to the desperate. I just thought you forgot to add emailing and pricing structure to participate AND if you get reminded sooner than later we can dispense with the inevitable dross that historically goes with your opening post as per numerous other posters have posted in the past of the same ilk.
Sarky , lol , hell no .
You go have a lay down ,when you get back up from your nap, you have a blessed day.

 

Although each and every spin is independent of each other spin TIME is still the most important factor when it comes to roulette and other games.
I don´t think any of us really can transcend it. Not even after seeing Einstein and other smoking figures in a new film.

Yes, I certainly expect to see three hits before long! TIME is relative, so feel free to perceive "before long" as you like before transcending it, lol.
At the roulette table (without melting clocks) THE NUMBER OF SPINS must be relevant.
I have not yet had the TIME to go through many sessions. Only 14 (Roulette simulator simple).
14 sessions. Each TIME reaching my goal (three hits). Sooner or later I might miss the goal or miss the train.
These 14 sessions took 561 spins.

 

I don't think that visualizing Salvador Dalí is going to add anything to the short term either. I have power tested many systems, with millions of spins through computer simulations each, in order to discover their breaking points. 561 spins is nothing more than around 17 hours of live play at a brick and mortar casino on a busy weekend. You can ride a Martingale progression for months before discovering its true nature. It happens around here every year. Someone will come along and swear by it. Every time this happens the lemmings will follow along to try to show the poor individual the truth.

It's always far more invigorating once someone adds money to the equation. I myself even charged to run a few schools for Reading Randomness before giving it away. I did it that way to get real interested students. It kept it to a few. But a skeptic here convinced me that anything that hard to master will never wreck the opportunity to use it because the amount of work required to learn it is so costly in time and brain cells anyway. That has now proven to be true.

There is no way that a matrix of numbers is going to produce a mathematical edge. Seeing individual random events clustered in a linear array and bustrised by a progression to make inferences of packetted data is nothing new around here. The topic is flat betting, I know.

It's very simple. In 300 spins you need to win 8 times to almost break even flat betting.

 

Yes it’s the teenage boy syndrome, look I have an erection I am god. Err for a little while at least, give me another hour or two, lol

 

I don't know why, but I have no luck at all in this game. I guess it's just not my thing.

 

Everyone has luck. Most have no idea how to go about targeting it. You can take 100 spins and place guesses on each bet for red to win. If you track it so that you can see it in a chart using visual dexterity then you will see your luck zones come and go. You will never find this if you don't go looking for it. You can bet a big bet when you are in a lucky streak and small bets any other types of conditions. That is all you need.

 

Thanks for reply #9, gizmotron. I am aware that we are losing as TIME goes by. What I aim at is three hits per session.
But I have not mentioned an edge or an overall profit.
We are all trapped in Time. Even BLOWFLIES. Yes, Salvador Dali painted melting clocks. Time is relative.
Today there is an election in Spain. And Dali painted THE HALLUCINOGENETIC TOREADOR. With Venus, blowflies and much more.

 

i have had a go at this, repeaters are the downfall of my attempts so far.

 

Thanks for giving it a try. In my test series so far I did not bet any repeater at all.
Maybe we could try adding winning streets to betting?
1 2 3 4 5 6. If street 4-6 has come - but not street 1-3 - we could bet street 4-6.
Just a thought.