Baccarat Baccarat Diary

"making this thread for consistency"

Disclaimer: I ain't betting yet with the real money but checking how my bet selection works. Please do not ask me for bet selection. I want to first check it myself thoroughly. I will be using different progressions to check it. I, personally, like G3M1 introduced to me by Eugene sir. Your input is welcome. I am eager to learn from you all. Thanks

 

Day 1(Yesterday)

Incomplete Shoe(I stopped tracking), " indicates shoe change

- Results -> LLLLWWWWWLLLLWL"WLLWWWWWLWLWWW"LLLLLWL(stopped tracking) (L- 19, W-17)

(without any stop loss)

G3M1 -> -1 -2 -1 -2 +1 +1 +2 +4 +1 -2 -2 -1 -2 +1 -1 +2 -1 -2 +1 +1 +2 +4 +1 -1 +2 -1 +2 +1 +2 -4 -2 -1 -2 -1 +2 -1

Net Result -> -0

FB(without any stop loss) -> -2

(after stopping at consecutive two losses)

*(W) waiting for virtual win*

G3M1 -> -1 -2!(W) +1 +2 +4 +1 -2 -2!(W) -1 +2 -1 -2!(W) +2 +2 +4 +1 -2 +2 -1 +2 +1 +2 -4 -2!(W) -1 = +5

Flat Betting -> +1

 

Day 2 (Today)

WLLWWLWLWLL"WLLWLWLWWLWWLW"LLWLLLWLLLWLWW (W-18, L-21)

(Without any stop loss)

Flat Betting -> -3

G3M1 -> +1 -2 -2 +1 +1 -2 +2 -1 +2 -1 -2 +1 -1 -2 +1 -1 +2 -1 +2 +1 -2 +2 +1 -2 +2 -1 -2 +1 -1 -2 -1 +2 -1 -2 -1 +2 -1 +2 +1 = -4

(with stop loss at 2)

G3M1 -> +1-2-2!(W)+1-2+2-1+2 -1 -2!(W) -1+2-1+2+1-2+2+1-2+2 -1 -2!(W) -1 -2!(W) -1 -2!(W)-1 +2 +1 = -7

Flat Betting -> -7

 

Hello Blacktiger,

Maybe I am reading your scores wrong, but they don't make sense using the G3M1.

Some of your scores go from +2 to +4 or -1 to +2.

You can't win 2 or 3 units using G3M1.

It's either -3, +1 or +7.

Anyway, when I get some time later today, I will go through your W/L registries and show you what would have happened using G3M1 the correct way.

 

oh! I am sorry sir. i think i do not know how to use it.

please teach me

 

Just a copy paste of a member of forum.

here the explanation
——-

Different scenario's for the G3M1.

Betting Bank.

B bet 1. win (geometric phase)
B bet 2. win (geometric phase)
B bet 4. win (geometric phase) Total win = +7. end of attack.

B bet 1. win (geometric phase)
B bet 2. win (geometric phase)
B bet 4. lose (geometric phase)
B bet 2. lose (martingale phase) Total loss = -3. end of attack.

B bet 1. lose (geometric phase)
B bet 2. lose (martingale phase) Total loss = -3. end of attack.

B bet 1. win (geometric phase)
B bet 2. win (geometric phase)
B bet 4. lose (geometric phase)
B bet 2. win (martingale phase) Total win = +1. end of attack.

B bet 1. win (geometric phase)
B bet 2. lose (geometric phase)
B bet 2. win (martingale phase) Total win = +1. end of attack.

You can only ever end up winning 1 unit if you are successful on the martingale phase and will always lose 3 units if you are unsuccessful on the martingale phase.
A positive result on the geometric phase winning all three bets results in a win of 7 units.

 

Thanks Sir! Can you use my W/L registeries and explain one time. It would be a great help for me. Thanks again.

 

Blacktiger,

Here is the first set of W/L results you posted. I will show you first what happens just betting all the way through and then show what happens if you wait after 2 losses for a virtual win.

L
L -3
L
L -3
W
W
W +7
W
W
L
L -3
L
L -3
W
L
W +1
L
L -3
W
W
W +7
W
W
L
W +1
L
W +1
W
W
L
L -3
L
L -3
L
W +1

That's a total of -3 betting it all the way through.

L
L -3
L
L
W
W
W
W +7
W
L
L -3
L
L
W
L
W +1
L
L -3
W
W
W
W +7
W
L
W +1
L
W +1
W
W
L
L -3
L
L
L
W

Waiting for a virtual W after two L and that's +5.

 

Understood, Sir!

Thankyou so much!

 

Day 2.1 - was free so tracked 3 shoes.

Results -> WWLWL'LLWLWWWWLW'WWWWLLLWLLL (W- 14, L-13)

(without stop loss)

G3M1 -> +1 +2 -4 +2,-1 -2, -1 +2,-1 +2, +1 +2 +4, -1 +2,+, +2 +4, +1 -2 -2, -1 +2, -1 -2,-1 = +6

Flat Betting -> +1

(With Stop loss at 2L)

G3M1 -> +1 +2 -4 +2,-1 -2,!(W),-1 +2, +1 +2 +4, -1 +2, +1 +2 +4, +1 -2 -2,!(W),-1 -2!(W) -> +6

Flat Betting -> +3

Done.

 

Day 2 results.

W
L
L -3
W
W
L
W +1
L
W +1
L
L -3
W
L
L -3
W
L
W +1
L
W +1
W
L
W +1
W
L
W +1
L
L -3
W
L
L -3
L
W +1
L
L -3
L
W +1
L
W +1
W +1 (INCOMPLETE GAME)

That's -8 flat betting all the way through.

W
L
L -3
W
W
L
W +1
L
W +1
L
L -3
W
L
L -3
W
L
W +1
L
W +1
W
L
W +1
W
L
W +1
L
L -3
W
L
L -3
L
W
L
L -3
L
W
L
W +1
W +1 (INCOMPLETE GAME)

That's -11 waiting for a virtual W after two L.

 

Day 2.1

W
W
L
W +1
L
L -3
L
W +1
L
W +1
W
W
W +7
L
W +1
W
W
W +7
W
L
L -3
L
W +1
L
L -3
L -1 (INCOMPLETE GAME)

That's +9 flat betting.

W
W
L
W +1
L
L -3
L
W
L
W +1
W
W
W +7
L
W +1
W
W
W +7
W
L
L -3
L
W
L
L -3
L

That's +8 after waiting for a virtual W after two L.

 

Day 3: Speed Baccarat Tracking

Results: WWLLLLWW'LLLWWWLWLLWWLWW (2 Shoes) (W - 12, L-11)

(Without any stop loss)

G3M1 -> +1 +2 -4 -2,-1 -2, +1 +2 -4 -2. -1 +2. +1 +2 -4 +2, -1 -2, +1 +2 -4 +2, +1 = -8

Flat Betting -> +1

(With stop loss at 2)

G3M1 -> +1 +2 -4 -2,!(w) +1 -2 -2!(w), +1 +2 -4 +2, -1 -2,!(w), +1 -2 +2, +1 = -6

Flat Betting -> +1

(Requesting @baccarou sir to cross-check)

Total

(without SL) -> G3M1: -10 units, FB: -3

(with SL) -> G3M1: +2 units, FB: -2

Thanks!

 

Day 3 Shoes

 

I did just take a look at the first shoe in the picture above and that was interesting just playing for either Banker all the way through or Player.

Banker +5.
Banker waiting for a virtual win after two LL +15.

Player +15.
Player waiting for a virtual win after two LL +17.

Mind you, it was a very streaky shoe and so G3M1 does well in that type of environment although some people do say that Baccarat shoes are more streaky than roulette decisions. I don't know because I have not checked it but it might be interesting testing your 'waiting for a virtual win after two LL's' using both sides (Banker and Player) and see what happens.

 

Thanks for the new idea, sir. I am eager to see more results on this from you.

 

@baccarou Sir, are you on telegram? I wanted to discuss a few things. Or you can drop your Gmail if it's ok for you.

 

You can catch me at baccarou9 (you can guess the rest)

 

To be honest, I think half the battle is matching up the right bet selection with the right progression.
Try and use them to compliment each other and you can enjoy some success.

I like to play for the dominance which means that you will have a strong side and a weak side.
It's easy to see them looking through the results.

W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W

Here the L is the weak side because you are only seeing them appear in singles.
The weak side could be anything though in a binary game and you can use your imagination for that.

Here is one I had a while back.

W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L

Now the good thing about a W/L registry like this is that it fits in very nicely with the G3M1 because you are always picking up the 1 unit profit even when you don't get the WWW for +7.

Let me show you what I mean.

W
W
W +7
L
W +1
W
W
L
W +1
L
W +1
W
W
W +7
L
W +1
W
L
W +1
W
L
W +1
W
L
W +1
L
W +1
W
W
W +7
L
W +1
L
L -3

The dominant W ended with the two LL's.

What will break down the Dominant sections is when you get what's called the 'terrible two's'

W
W
L
L -3
W
W
L
L -3
W
W
L
L -3
W
W
L
L -3

The way to get around this is to create a bet selection where you can use some kind of situational awareness and so you don't get caught out by things like the above. There are many pitfalls waiting to trap you in bet selection and when you find them like the terrible two's, you need to turn things around and create ways where you can use them and they become a strength and not a weakness.

cheers