Baccarat Ding Ding Ding Ding!!!!

Well cats, I done it. I finally managed to capture 10 000unit/1 millions cdn$ nets profits, tax free cake in my pockets. And as always I pony up the picture of the relevant page from my notes book. So it took a couple years of grindage and I hit the one millions cdn$ nets profits mark at shoe #8014. So yeah I face some adversity along the way and worst case getting clipped for -77 units downs-draw. But I never come close to busting my initial 250units/25ks lifes-time bankroll; so I figure my baccarats style is even more profitable than the bits-coin, hey hey!

 

Didn't you already tell us on another thread? Nevertheless, congratulations. And thanks for figuring out the flat bet holy grail for us!

But....gambling winnings ARE taxable in Canada as a business enterprise.

Cheers

 

and you know what? You're still an asshole!

 

its the second time already. Understandable for first time, but For sure with celebrations you could atleast be more patient and make clear picture. It takes only few seconds to be still with the camera. And real proof would be photos like mikael posted from online table account where you clearly can see how many bets and winnings has happened across the months.
Make it happen!

 

buy yourself a phone first , Then take a sip from the holy grail

 

Have you ever played [removed, pay to advertise]?

Have you ever played [removed, pay to advertise]?

 

why wont you share you stratagy you say baker only but how do you use it?

 

he did share it. He posted shoes and results. He bets B after a P. If lose bet B again. Done. It's not awful but it does lose long term. So...what he's not saying is he uses subjective tweaks based on particular shoe signature. Works well in choppy shoes.
.

 

so if its a long term loser how is he up so many units ? guess hes a lier?!?

 

Let me put it this way. There is no flat bet method where you can bet the same exact pattern every single shoe and win anywhere near one and a half units ner after commission. That's his claim.

 

have you ever tested through a sim i played 10 shoes last night end ended up 9 units total but it could be just good variance. Also I don’t know his exact system I’m just going by what you said does he have a stop loss? Does he ever stop win or is his full system just bet once after player and in win stop till next player and if lose bet once more then stop till next player and repete

 

Of course it was tested using thousands of live shoes. That's how I know it's notsense. He says he never stops. Just keep going as you described win or lose.

 

im going to test 100 shoes on wizzard sim and let you know way harder to beat a sim so will see

 

not a bad start lol

 

did 31 shoes came out -8 units couldent do all 100 system is a loser only because the banker commision would be up 17 units if no commision so maybe good to get comps

 

Just for the crack, I did 50 shoes. I am not really bothered either way but have an open enough mind to test for myself and in fairness to Soxfan, it's not like he his some greenhorn and so what the heck. It's easy to test if you have the B or P results laid out in front of you.

1) -1
2) -8
3) +3
4) level
5) +7
6) -3
7) +6
8) +8
9) +8
10) +1
11) -3
12) -4
13) +5
14) level
15) -1
16) -10
17) +6
18) -1
19) +5
20) +3
21) +5
22) +2
23) level
24) -1
25) -4
26) +13
27) +1
28) -3
29) -3
30) -12
31) -3
32) -1
33) +2
34) +2
35) level
36) -1
37) level
38) +5
39) -10
40) +1
41) -2
42) level
43) -4
44) -1
45) -9
46) +1
47) +9
48) -3
49) -2
50) -8

So by my reckoning (and not factoring in the the tax) that's -5. The tax probably costs around another 20 units.

The first 10 shoes produced +21 (a bit of a purple patch) The last 40 shoes produced -26. It seems volatile as well in the sense that there isn't much consistency from shoe to shoe.

It makes you think because the single P's appear more than single B's. The chops are your friend and the 2's don't really hurt you but what does hurt you is the runs of PPP+ and especially when they swarm. So although on the face of it there is some logic there, it doesn't perform too well (admittedly over 50 shoes)

Based on my own play and methods, I kind of see this as playing with one hand tied behind your back despite what anybody else may so. Yes, it did well, +7, +8, +8, +13, +9 in Bank dominated shoes but there are shoes where player can dominate by 10 to 15 decisions and then you get the -10, -12, -10, -9, -8 shoes. I know for a fact having tested thousands and thousands of shoes that you can get a Player domination spanning a lot of shoes and going in with the idea of playing Bank only will wipe you out. That's the reality of it!

cheers

 

Congratz well deserved for you hard work

 

If what you say is true that you earned 1 mil in net profits, then good for you considering that it took you only a couple of years. How many playing hours in total though?

The picture that you posted is nothing but a blur. What's up with that? Please post something more legible.

 

exactly im starting to think this guy is a scam he wont even say his system

 

I don't believe he is a scam; otherwise he would have tried to sell his system if it's even a system.

Whatever his strategy is in baccarat, it obviously works for him along with flat betting and I'm inclined to believe that it's flat betting that's the key more than anything else.

The problem with flat betting is that when a losing streak becomes a long one, it's so hard to control your mind not to chase to get the losses back quickly where all hell breaks loose. I've done it too many times to count and I always think to myself afterwards why in the world did I do that? But for whatever the reason, I cannot prevent from it happening again. I did it a several times in my month long vacation in May and June, where I had to resort to betting $3K playing Pai Gow Poker because I was down $2,600. I also bet $2K a few times and I was lucky enough to have won all of them, but imagine how much I would have been down if I've lost all those big bets? I would have been down quite a bit and I wouldn't be able to bet big enough because of the table limit even though I had the bankroll to do it. Discipline isn't my strong suit.

I have been programming for over 40 years. I wish I could program my brain to never deviate from flat betting; basically make my brain become a robot and do what it should do which is just walk away when a long losing streak occurs or continue to bet the trends instead of just watching because I've won already.

I finished programming baccarat scoring using VBA in Excel. I will be programming various bet selection criteria and see which can win the most and consistently. Then, I will try that at DraftKings for $1 minimum. If it works, then I will do the same at RNG or live $100 minimum tables.