TurboGenius Advantage of Repeaters explained - part 3 - 2020

Through the comment he makes to you. Because you talk to him about the top 3 of 3x and not top 3 of 1x. And he tells you that you play the 3 (i understan three numbers of 3x) as the top 1. Top 1 stop at first 4x.

How did you interpretit it?

 

I checked the variance across a bunch of the different horseraces and it appeared that each level and space in the level was the same in terms of variance. There were some interesting parts where the variance decreased but that was moving towards the middle of the levels. It seemed strange. I posted it somewhere in my law of 3rd analysis thread I think towards the back.

I never really found any consistency in who the leaders would be or when they would hit. There's always a leader or two, but it's always a reactive thing not proactive - you can only know for certain after the fact.

 

Also it's funny how @Nimo "play top3 like top1" hint gets so many different interpretations, how did you get to 3x to 4x from this @Quos I don't know




This is why I posted that see someone trying to screw in a screw, so you want to help them, so you hand them a screwdriver and they end up using it as a hammer! Lol

Too many inflict their own experience onto what is being said.

 

That's why I always claimed that even if you or @Denzie or Turbo would post step by step how you play, most wouldn't be able to achieve same results as they'd venture outside of the rules based on their bias/experience that in this case is an enemy.

Since you added that hint, I've gone through few variants already as it does leave quite a few options still.
Initially I focused on playing first 3 numbers that show, instead of top1 that Turbo plays in his example, reset after any 2x hits. While that doesn't win flat, it produces a lot of wins, use of progression is required and that will and does cause a loss unless money mgm is applied, but I came to conclusion it's probably not what you meant.

 

Then @Denzie bumps the "free spins" topic and tbh I'm not even sure you both align on how to best play what Turbo is preaching

Does that lean towards playing the streets that top3 numbers are in rather than singles? I guess no harm testing.

 

You see my and likely other's issue here @Nimo, as you know the solution its easy in your mind, but as I see pieces of puzzle, the more there are the more possible options and then potentially not spending enough time on each if I dont see immediate results.

 

I used to inflict my own bias too. Then I just stopped. Read everything carefully as if I never played in my life. It started making more sense that way.

 

Hi guys , i was thinking if we have that Avg on the first row should be on the right direction saying that when it is time to hit on the first column except our three horses , what is the % that it hit also another number that is waiting on the same line for that X?

 

Here is also some data for the delay...

 

Huge thanks, Nimo.
Playing top 3 as top 1 does not fail, good progression and trigger.

 

Hola Yoigo, ¿podrías explicar mas o menos como lo aplicas?.

Gracias.

 

Don't do it Yoigo.

 

Tan solo diré lo que dejó dicho turbo. 2 pizcas de sal...

 

4 long years until today including a global pandemic thanks Nimo.

 

To me it seems like you would just play the numbers the way turbo said in part 1, but for top 3 numbers. Which seems similar to how Eugene described it as well earlier in this post. I haven't tested this.. just thinking out loud

 

Hi Chrono, i have test it but don't work flat betting.
Also i have test with top 3 3x but also work flat betting!. And also other variants with nimo hint.

 

I dont think any of this means to work flat betting

 

First repeat occur about spin 8 (avg).
When bet top3 1x and any number hit we loss 18 units (avg).
When bet top3 1x and any number hit we win 18 units (avg).
We need a hit rate above 50% to make a profit.

Tomorrow I will continue doing more tests

 

To me, it would seem counter intuitive for it to work with a positive progression if it doesn't work flat.

Positive progs will amplify the players edge, as negative progressions will amplify the house edge. The same principle applies when experiencing positive variance, thats when a positive prog will work best. A negative progression will also work best during positive variance but leave gains on the table.

Therefore it must work flat betting in order to work with a positive progression.

The only way a negative truly works is if we can reduce the dispersion or wins and loss streaks as twoup mentioned in his carsch progression post.

 

It's straight forward if you go 1x to 2x and reset at either first win or a repeat that isnt your number, but that on its own isnt enough long term even with prog.
So how do you go from there moving on to 2x and beyond if not in profit?
Also you mentioned Eugene, his idea was to stop betting ie. 3x top3 as soon as 4th 3x shows.
I guess this could be a stop trigger , but thats not within what Turbo shows in part1, so I think it's probably overcomplicating things and that probably distracts us from simpler play.