TurboGenius Writings of a GENIUS

Look at reply #2

 

You might need to open replies 1 & 2 in a new window too see better.

 

Are those postings by Turbo? As I understand it, he in recent years taught to play numbers only after they hit (1s to 2s and higher). In #2 the approach seems to be to choose any number and wait for it to hit the first time. And even if we do that, isn’t applying a positive progression after that the same thing as basing our bet selection on past spins?

 

In post 2 TG says
should you bet every spin? answer was yes.
But are past spins those that came before he sits at the table?
When that 1st number shows it came from future spins. He says the word past and the phrase past spins should be forgotten. To win at roulette you have to win the current bet and future ones. He says once you figure this out you'll do much better.


Is #14 now a past spin? If this was ADV 3 #'s 14-25-0 start lap 1x. Do any of the 3-1x match from futrue spins? Yes zero is match and starts lap 2x. The very next spin from the future is another zero and starts lap 3x.
Just like TG when I started #14 is my spin and is part of my stream. All 242 spins are my numbers. Yes you can say they are past spins; but he said once you figure this out you'll do much better.

 

Do we need to try and replicate TG. No. Take Denzies 100, +100

 

After decades something went wrong with all this math!

 

I guess some need to re-read TG. Now the DSAA promotes rand org. Rand org performs just like live German spins and of course RNG.

Oh past spins or are they?

 

So isn't this what playing repeaters is about? You bet a number after it hits, expecting it to hit again within a certain amount of spins. And I guess you could play this way strictly mechanically?

NBN, I don't know if following the trot is your main approach, but it seems to me that you are making active decisions to play either hits or unhits, depending on the situation, when you are demonstrating that way of playing.

 

Nope its just betting for repeats. The question is how many numbers do you use/bet. Plus he tells you to use a progression. That's another part you'll need to find.
18310 1303 66758 75096 1.1248989 10.03.25 (16)
20230 1438 83018 93276 1.1235636 10.03.25 (17)
Played this at MPR just now. Game 17 was slow as player called Tommy not using ready. But this stream was at lap 8x

Parsifal look at reply #9 see how the laps are completing 181 spins lap 10x
MPR 135 spins lap 8x

 

I played it using the method I tried here before (playing maximum 3 contenders for the next repeater level and keeping only the winner after a win) and failed. Of course I could have exited at spin 130. At that point the 0 reached 10x (which is early, usually it happens around spin 160 when I play) and the runner-up was 3 or something laps behind - all that is pretty extreme. I would also have done better if I after spin 130 had kept both 0 and 18 in play.

Parsifal what does the stream look like on the live German stream above. Is it not similar to what you said in adv3 in aug.
And the game you posted had matches n/a-2-0-0-1-1-2-2-2-3-2-3-2-2. lap 11 2 matches.

This was july
Starting from 2 appearances of a number (or R1), I bet up to a maximum of 3 contenders for the next repeater level. When ever a number reached the next level, I restarted and bet only that number. If there were more than 3 contenders, which happened, but only in the starting phase of the session, I would stop betting and resume when the next level was reached. The successful streak in the middle of the session was achieved when a single number was in the lead and kept repeating itself with no other number(s) contending for the lead. When, after that, other numbers started catching up and I at times had to play 2 numbers, it drew down my BR significantly, as you can see. Although I finished in plus, I am not sure it would have be possible to carry on playing like this infinitely and winning. Or would it? In this example of 1000 spins, the highest achieving number reached 40 appearances (which happened already at spin 963).

Does the key lie in resetting and starting a new "horse race" more often and possibly defining the goal as something else than reaching the next repeater level? The outcome of this example is not that great, to be honest. Even with an exit at the peak (spin 577), the profit would have been only 177 units.

If you had a BR of 10'000 what prog could you use on the excel with lap 14x.
Suppose you used the mentioned 1-2-3-5 and at lap 13 you were using unit of 13 and it took 25 spins profit. The #18, 33 spins.
So, lap 14 would be 14 units assuming the stream hasn't busted 10'000

 

Of course you need to reset. Keep the game as short as possible. Rince and repeat. The further you go , the bigger the gaps , the more things going all over the place . The DD gets deeper. Heavier chips needed . Get in ...attack and get out . I'm not kidding when I say I'm mostly done under 1 cyclus. Law of the third!!!!!!!!!!!!! ( and most definitely under 2 . Aggressive progression!




Again....Hey TG , ....

When 3 random things go against each other...
One will appear before average
One will appear around average
One will appear above average

So which one to bet ? It's not that hard.





And 10k BR ? Not bad but....if you're method required 10k... is it also making 10k profits on a winning session? Or more like 1k ? Big difference.

 

Oh look Den where would you be?

 

Pick a day from Wiesbaden table 4 for December. I'm missing 15, 24, 25, 31
See what that diagonal line is showing.

 

1/12/24

 

Better still

 

From spin 20 I would get my hits and be in + in the next spins ...and quite easily actually. Don't see any problem here.

And yes...the progression! Some wise man used to say........PROGRESSIONS ARE NOT THE ENEMY

 

Not if you follow TG's bet every spin. 2 lots of no matches. But #25 is your friend

 

how so first repeaters only start with 20 and 23 and they never won only next one 25