Baccarat Wizard of odds 1000 shoe Baccarat

Regarding the different streams that someone may choose to look at. What they are really good at is giving you confirmation of what's happening in a shoe but in a different format and it's providing you with a bit of a deeper insight.

To begin with, it's very easy to get confused with them and you don't want to be jumping around them like a headless chicken looking for different bets. They should compliment each other and when you reach that point (which took me a couple of years) then you know you are using them correctly.

 

You can't compare roulettes ours-come to baccarats outs-come. The roulettes ec are strictly the 50/50 proposition while the baccarats result favor the bankers. So, the shrewd play is to run anti-streaks at baccarats only, betting only against the players streaks, hey hey.

 

Okay, this shoe also suggests that there is a possibility of 2s B. But it wasn't there. How would you handle this situation?
The second stream is more prone to forming 2s, at first. But again, I only find out after the shoe has been played. As the game progresses, I'm still lost.

 

Hello, I was looking at your shoe yesterday.

Anyway, here was the S/D registry from the beginning.

D
S
S win
S loss
D win
D win
S win
S win
D win
D win
D loss
S win
S win
S loss
S loss
S
S
S
S
D
D
S
S

So as you said, it has a bit of a 2's dominance to it before that breaks.

Looking at that same registry again and you also have a lot of repeats.

D
S
S repeat
S repeat
D
D repeat
S
S repeat
D
D repeat
D repeat
S
S repeat
S repeat
S repeat
S repeat
S repeat
S repeat
S repeat
D
D repeat
S
S repeat

So when those dominant 2's break. you could go straight into the repeat dominance.

Then from the next hand in the same shoe and it reverts back to a dominance on the 2's.

D win
D win
S win
S win
D win
S loss
S win
S loss
D win
D win
D loss
S win
S win
S loss
D win
D win
D loss
D loss

Plenty of winning runs there with intermittent single losses making it a breeze to play through.

Like I said somewhere up above however, you need some type of indicators which you can tack on to these streams to guide you and so you don't get lost and this helps you then to break the shoe down into sections. You don't need to be able to read them all perfectly to win and that's pretty much impossible anyhow but the more you study them and play around with them, you will notice things that can help you.

To be honest, the dominance runs / streaks that are displayed above are the easy ones. There are more complex ones and it's possible with the right indicators in your streams to weave a lot of these dominance runs together so you don't actually get caught out with too many losses when one section is ending and another one is starting. It takes time to find it but you can do it.

cheers

 

Thank you.
When you say that you need to break the shoe into parts, does this mean that when the B/P side dominates, it will be equal to 1 segment? As Jimske wrote above, there can be on average from 0 to 4 such segments.
And an interesting perspective with indicators, dominance will be in each shoe, and in each flow - at least for a short period of time, one of the sides will come out ahead.
Could the Turbo table from Part 3 be anything like such an indicator?

 

For example, this boot has 3 good elements with dominance. And also in the SD flow there are many U (unbalanced).
SDDS(B)DSSD(B)DSDD(U)SSSS(U)DSSS(U)SDSS(B)DDDS(U)SDDD(U)DDDS(U)DSDD(U)SSSS(U)DDSD(U)DSDD(U)DDSS(B)DSDD(U)SSSS(U)SDSS(U)DDDS(U)SSDS(U)

 

Data streams and dominance. Here's a question for anyone who wishes to entertain it. In terms of dominance of outcomes. Does anyone think that using SD compared with SO (TBL,OTBL) or PB is going to make a difference?

 

Do cats understand that there are billions of combination/permutation for an individual shoe of baccarats, hey hey????

 

Absolutely correct, there is always a loosing combination for any giving style,this is where research , observation , testing and sufficient bankroll management plays out especially during adversity.

 

the irony has seemed to escape you, Mr Obvious. You still ascertain that there is a particular pattern that can be predicted to overcome the EV.

 

NO!!!!!