1. Welcome to the #1 Gambling Community with the best minds across the entire gambling spectrum. REGISTER NOW!
  2. Have a gambling question?

    Post it here and our gambling experts will answer it!
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Discussions in this section are assumed to be EV- as they are outside of the Advantage Play section. For EV+ discussions, please visit the Advantage Play section.
    Dismiss Notice
Welcome Guests Ask Questions Non-AP

Roulette How to win this absolute win/loss ratio...?

Discussion in 'Roulette Forum' started by beat-the-wheel, Feb 28, 2015.

Page 2 of 2
  1. zengrifter

    zengrifter Member Lineage to Founders

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2015
    Likes:
    22
    Occupation:
    Serial Entrepreneur
    Location:
    San Clemente, CA
    Oh, I see ...
    ... Albalaha's tagline is "randomness is not infinite" ...
    ... but I THINK that premise is not in accord with Bayes Theorm and/or other tenets of conventional statistical logic and probability.
    ... Unfortunately I may not be fully qualified to debate such.
     
    zengrifter, Mar 2, 2015
    #21
  2. zengrifter

    zengrifter Member Lineage to Founders

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2015
    Likes:
    22
    Occupation:
    Serial Entrepreneur
    Location:
    San Clemente, CA
    House edge is NOT the "only evil" that makes for losing - it is actually quite easy to lose WITH a mathematical advantage.
     
    zengrifter, Mar 2, 2015
    #22
  3. albalaha

    albalaha Active Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2014
    Likes:
    122
    Occupation:
    player
    Location:
    India
    It is easy to lose only if you are ignorant of this edge. Further, unless we get an unbeatable variance, house edge can't beat us by itself. Give me any 47/100 win/trials case of an EC, I will beat it with reasonable bet limit and earn 1 unit at some place or other, for sure.
     
    albalaha, Mar 2, 2015
    #23
  4. albalaha

    albalaha Active Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2014
    Likes:
    122
    Occupation:
    player
    Location:
    India
    If you are a firm believer of conventional statistical logic and probability, quit gambling and even thinking of ever trying that because they only preach that you can not win.
     
    albalaha, Mar 2, 2015
    #24
  5. zengrifter

    zengrifter Member Lineage to Founders

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2015
    Likes:
    22
    Occupation:
    Serial Entrepreneur
    Location:
    San Clemente, CA
    Huh? I'm an expert card counter and a longterm winner ...
    ... and what I do is fully grounded in math and statistical logic and proven by simulation.

    What sort of proof or theorem can you produce to underscore your claims?
    Or do you make claims for winning at roulette?
     
    zengrifter, Mar 2, 2015
    #25
  6. zengrifter

    zengrifter Member Lineage to Founders

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2015
    Likes:
    22
    Occupation:
    Serial Entrepreneur
    Location:
    San Clemente, CA
    You are just spouting 'BBB', IMO. Playing for variance is not a winning tactic.
     
    zengrifter, Mar 2, 2015
    #26
  7. ddarko

    ddarko Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2015
    Likes:
    1
    What does BBB stand for pls Zen ?

    Thxs.
     
    ddarko, Mar 2, 2015
    #27

  8. beat-the-wheel

    beat-the-wheel Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2015
    Likes:
    1
    Dear Albalaha,

    I am intrigued when U say 47/100.

    WHY 47???
    Why the LIMIT at 47/100?



    How about 46, 45, 44, or less, as we know that 35/100 could also "happen"...in normal circumstances, before v-management.

    Does this mean U will lose? If <47?

    Does this mean if U bulldoze ahead at, or >47, that will be huge winning, albeit, also lose huge in every few attempt when the 47 failed to materialized?!



    As I see it, maybe U also mean 47%, in LESS than 100bets, will be enough for U to win big?

    [Of course the old good Labby will win, at 33%+1win, but U mean within "reasonable-bet-limit"]

    I know a 'progression', that will win at 47/100,
    and I see if we bulldoze ahead, it will win huge with 47, or more.

    Thanks.
     
    beat-the-wheel, Mar 3, 2015
    #28
  9. albalaha

    albalaha Active Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2014
    Likes:
    122
    Occupation:
    player
    Location:
    India
    By 47/100 I mean in the presence of unfavorable odds or house edge which is considered the prime reason a player should not win.
     
    albalaha, Mar 3, 2015
    #29
Page 2 of 2

Share This Page