Roulette Scams WARNING: The owner of the Top Roulette Forums, Steven George Hourmouzis, is a Convicted Scammer

Junket King ,

If you locate Wendell send him to rouletteforum .cc .He fits in there.. They will love him.

 

I actually LOLed when I read that line. Best joke I have read all day.

 

Nowin,


Since the experts have left there will be more room for amateurs like you .Enjoy the day among the amateur league.

P>S> When playing 9 numbers do not forget to cover the zero. SOP for amateurs . hey.hey.he y .


ROFLMAO.

 

What will RouletteGhost do if there's no one left to victimize him over there?

 

That place went to hell among the serious players when they decided to put a safe-haven sub-forum
where anyone who doesn't agree or provides facts can's post.
That's not how any forum can succeed. Might as well run for president in N. Korea for that matter.
Where it's all a fixed system but pretends to not be.

 

it was created so that the system players who enjoy creating and testing systems can post in peace

so that the repetition of the AP player did not have to revisited over and over again

a mutual respect of all players

the AP player was trolling people and it had to stop

not everyone seeks to make a living off the game

a negative expectation casino gambling game has no right or wrong way, people will play differently, this must be acknowledged and respected for a gambling forum to succeed

the AP player should be wealthy and not worried about a petty forum

once the chips hit that mat, they have the same odds to hit no matter how they ended up there, everytime

caleb is a rude prick who posts idiot pictures to condescend people, so glad the ignore feature works here

ND, god knows i like him, i realllly do....but hes a bit tough at times, and he shouldnt be, he plays systems

 

lol. No.
It's a place where anyone who posts anything contrary to what the others "think" is no longer allowed to comment.
That's absurd. Sure it's fine to do though - and this is what happens.... the good posters that most forums
would want to participate leave.
There's no respect in discriminating against "certain" people posting because "no one wants to hear what they have to say".
The total number of people who join gambling forums with no intention of winning and just want to play for sheer entertainment - while never being concerned about winning.... is probably 1 person total.
The other 99% of people want to know how to WIN. They learn these things from people who know.... and then a forum banishes those people from posting... makes no sense.

 

Idea of ‘safe space,’ as defined on college campuses, is inherently totalitarian
The only way to be "safe" from having one's core beliefs disparaged or dismissed is to abolish diversity and disagreement altogether — to mandate the one right way of life and of thinking.

BY JOSEPH R. REISERT
Unfortunately, the idea of the “safe space” is inherently totalitarian, a threat to freedom of speech, freedom of inquiry and to democracy itself. Just this week, we saw two striking examples, one at the University of Missouri, the other at Yale.

At the University of Missouri, which has been roiled by protests that ultimately led to the resignation of the university chancellor and president, a journalist was forcibly prevented from reporting about one of the protests because his presence made the protesters feel unsafe.

Under Missouri state law, the reporter had an absolute right to cover the demonstration, which was taking place in a “free speech zone.” The protesters had other ideas. The whole incident can be seen on YouTube: A crowd of the protesters had formed a human wall around a tent city they didn’t want the reporter to photograph, then they bodily pushed the reporter backwards, while demanding that he respect their space. Ultimately, after more such aggressions against the reporter, a professor (!) called for “some muscle” to make the reporter leave.

At Yale University, after the administration issued an all-campus email advising students not to wear offensive Halloween costumes, a faculty member who lives on the campus as a faculty leader of one of the dormitory complexes wrote a follow-up email to the students in her dorm.

She wrote that, while she appreciated the “laudable” motives of the administrators, she called upon the community “to reflect more transparently” on whether it is a good idea for administrators to tell students how to dress up for Halloween.

Formerly, she wrote, colleges were places of “transgressive” experience; increasingly, it seems, “they have become places of censure and prohibition. And this censure and prohibition come from above, not from yourselves!” She concluded that it was not her business to control the costumes young people wear.

This email provoked, not the desired conversation, but a storm of angry protests in which the students in effect demanded to be treated as children.

At one key moment, the letter writer’s husband — officially the senior faculty member responsible for the dorm complex — went to meet with the protesting students. This encounter, too, can be seen on video. The lone professor is surrounded by students, one of whom screams obscenities at him and insists “it is not about creating an intellectual community here.” What she demands instead is a “home” and a “safe space.”

As at Missouri, the Yale students’ demand for a “safe space” became an excuse for bullying and a license for insult. As at Missouri, we see at Yale a mob of angry protesters demanding their own safety in a manner calculated to make the target of their anger feel decidedly unsafe.

It is not accidental that the demand for safety so quickly morphed in both cases into a license for aggression. The problem is inherent in the demand for a subjective feeling of perfect safety.

Diversity and disagreement are never altogether comfortable, and they can never be made perfectly “safe.” Few things are as unpleasant as having one’s foundational certitudes challenged and one’s core beliefs — or one’s very identity — disparaged, or dismissed.

But the only way to be “safe” from such experiences is to abolish diversity and disagreement altogether — to mandate the one right way of life and of thinking, as the Missouri and Yale protesters are trying to do. Ultimately, that aim is self-defeating: Once today’s threatening voices have been silenced, new disagreements will arise, provoking new anxieties about “safety.”

The only stable and enduringly peaceful order is one that accepts the discomfort that inevitably arises in a big world full of people who respect one another’s freedom to disagree.

Joseph R. Reisert is associate professor of American constitutional law and chairman of the department of government at Colby College in Waterville.

 

there is an entire forum to post on...do not dwell on a tiny sub section with 4 threads.......

 

Regarding the "nursery" or "safe zone" on roulette forum. It unfortunately encourages and propagates the spread of an infection of ignorance. Nuance, myth, superstitions, and feelings trump the banned use of common sense, logic, math, and the facts. It also creates a safe zone where the hucksters and scammers can prey on the ignorant and foolish. Steve is more patient than I am with the absurd. I would have never created the "safe zone". I'm sure he just saw it as a clever way to shut them up.



When the safe zone posters leave the nursery and travel to the casino, who will shield them from the real world?

 

I'll tell you one thing with certainty.....if I did not work a regular 9 to 5, and instead played biased wheels for a living:

I would "shoot for the stars" and I would be wealthy

Lavish house and car....

traveling the world (before the refugees destroy Europe, especially)

I mean traveling a lot, I'd make a ton of money in a short period of time traveling to different casinos...pay off my mortgage

living LARGE

the LAST thing I would do is repeat myself on gambling forums....I would see them as petty





Do you know Dan Bilzerian??

his life









NO SUCCESSFUL AP PLAYER WOULD BE HERE

 

This is an AP player taking advantage of bias wheels

not a forum dweller

 

So you see all of the forum members, except me of course, as all being a bunch of petty losers?

Just curious then...why are you here??

 

let me be a professional roulette player, milking biased wheels

and spending time on petty forums

said noone ever

i see you posting mister ignored

haha

 

I am a successful roulette player, I play for a living........biased wheels...the history of the game is the key

"I have made more in 8 hours than you will make in your life"

However, I spend time on petty forums

It's crazier than scientology...and kinda cute

 

I know right?

 

https://media.giphy.com/media/3o7aTskHEUdgCQAXde/giphy.gif

 

I would have been a zillionaire

But his book bursted into flames in my mail box

 

The SHIT on this thread has reached a new high.

 

System churners and amateurs are welcome at rouletteforum cc . But if you an expert and having won your stripes in the casinos trenches BE ON GUARD.

If you are limiting you posts to to some expert opinion you are being accused of trolling.


Never mind occasional scammers. They are just small fry capitalist trying to make an extra buck.


There is a HACKER on board at RFcc. whose full SN I shall publish shortly.